<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute - recent issues</title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1460-2105</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0027-8874</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/603-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/603-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/605?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/607?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/610?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/614?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/616?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/617?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/618?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/619?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/621?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/622?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/630?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/642?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/649?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/663?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/672?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/680?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/680-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/681?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/682?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/683?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/683-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/684?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/685?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/685-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/685-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/519?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/519-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/519-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/520?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/521?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/524?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/526?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/528?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/530?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/531?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/532?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/532-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/533?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/542?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/552?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/563?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/572?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/580?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/596?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/596-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/597?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/598?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/599?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/600?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/600-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/447?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/447-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/447-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/449?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/451?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/452?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/454?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/456?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/457?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/459?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/460?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/461?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/462?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/475?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/483?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/492?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/502?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/513?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/603?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/603?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn139</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>603</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>603</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>IN THIS ISSUE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/603-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Review of Swedish Cervical Cancer Screening Program Demonstrates Effectiveness and Room for Improvement]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/603-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn162</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Review of Swedish Cervical Cancer Screening Program Demonstrates Effectiveness and Room for Improvement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>603</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>603</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MEMO TO THE MEDIA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/603-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medicare Costs Estimated to Top $21.1 Billion for 5 Years of Care for Elderly Cancer Patients]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/603-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn163</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medicare Costs Estimated to Top $21.1 Billion for 5 Years of Care for Elderly Cancer Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>603</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>603</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MEMO TO THE MEDIA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/605?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Routine Audit of Large-Scale Cervical Cancer Screening Programs]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/605?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cuzick, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn131</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Routine Audit of Large-Scale Cervical Cancer Screening Programs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>606</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>605</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/607?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estimating the Cost of Cancer Care in the United States: A Work Very Much in Progress]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/607?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lipscomb, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn132</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estimating the Cost of Cancer Care in the United States: A Work Very Much in Progress]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>610</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>607</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/610?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Model Citizen? Is Tamoxifen More Effective Than Aromatase Inhibitors if We Pick the Right Patients?]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/610?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hayes, D. F., Stearns, V., Rae, J., Flockhart, D., on behalf of the Consortium on Breast Cancer Pharmacogenomics]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn127</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Model Citizen? Is Tamoxifen More Effective Than Aromatase Inhibitors if We Pick the Right Patients?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>613</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>610</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/614?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Busting Cancer Clusters: Realities Often Differ From Perceptions]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/614?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benowitz, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn144</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Busting Cancer Clusters: Realities Often Differ From Perceptions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>621</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>614</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/616?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Curry Compound Fights Cancer in the Clinic]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/616?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carter, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn141</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Curry Compound Fights Cancer in the Clinic]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>617</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>616</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/617?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[StatBite: Percentage of Current Childhood Smokers Worldwide]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/617?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn138</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[StatBite: Percentage of Current Childhood Smokers Worldwide]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>617</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>617</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/618?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[End of High-Dose Chemotherapy for High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients?]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/618?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tuma, R. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn143</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[End of High-Dose Chemotherapy for High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>619</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>618</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/619?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding Pathways of Calorie Restriction: A Way To Prevent Cancer?]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/619?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grifantini, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn142</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding Pathways of Calorie Restriction: A Way To Prevent Cancer?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>621</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>619</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/621?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Awards, Appointments, Announcements]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/621?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn140</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Awards, Appointments, Announcements]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>621</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>621</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/622?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Screening-Preventable Cervical Cancer Risks: Evidence From a Nationwide Audit in Sweden]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/622?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The effectiveness of cervical cancer screening programs differs widely in different populations. The reasons for these differences are unclear. Routine and comprehensive audits have been proposed as an ethically required component of screening. We performed a nationwide audit of the effectiveness of the Swedish cervical cancer screening program.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We identified all invasive cervical cancer cases that were diagnosed in Sweden from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2001, and had been reported to the Swedish Cancer Registry (n = 1230 cases). We verified the diagnoses by histopathologic rereview and matched each case subject to five (population-based) age-matched control subjects who were identified from the National Population Register. The Pap smear screening histories for case and control subjects were reviewed for a 6-year period using the National Cervical Cancer Screening Register, which contains data on essentially all relevant cytological and histological diagnoses in Sweden. Odds ratios (ORs), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), of cervical cancer according to screening history were calculated in conditional logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Women who had not had a Pap smear within the recommended screening interval had higher risk of cervical cancer than women who had been screened (OR = 2.52, 95% CI = 2.19 to 2.91). This risk was similarly increased for all age groups (<I>P</I><SUB>homogeneity</SUB> = .96). The risk for nonsquamous cell cervical cancers (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.20 to 2.11) was also increased. Women who had not had a Pap smear within the recommended screening interval had a particularly high risk of advanced cancers (OR = 4.82, 95% CI = 3.61 to 6.44). Among women who had been screened within the recommended interval, those with abnormal Pap smears had a higher risk of cervical cancer than those with normal smears (OR = 7.55, 95% CI = 5.88 to 9.69) and constituted 11.5% of all women with cervical cancer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Nonadherence to screening intervals was the major reason for cervical cancer morbidity. The screening program was equally effective for women of all ages and was also effective against nonsquamous cancers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrae, B., Kemetli, L., Sparen, P., Silfverdal, L., Strander, B., Ryd, W., Dillner, J., Tornberg, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn099</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Screening-Preventable Cervical Cancer Risks: Evidence From a Nationwide Audit in Sweden]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>629</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>622</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/630?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost of Care for Elderly Cancer Patients in the United States]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/630?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Timely estimates of the costs of care for cancer patients are an important element in the formulation of national cancer programs and policies. We estimated net costs of care for elderly cancer patients in the United States for the 18 most prevalent cancers and for all other tumor sites combined.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results&ndash;Medicare files to identify 718 907 cancer patients and 1 623 651 noncancer control subjects. Within each tumor site, noncancer control subjects were matched to patients by sex, age group, geographic location, and phase of care (ie, initial, continuing, and last year of life). Costs of care were estimated for each phase by use of Medicare claims data from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2003. Per-patient net costs of care were applied to the 5-year survival of cancer patients by phase of care to estimate 5-year costs of care and extrapolated to the elderly US Medicare population diagnosed with cancer in 2004.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Across tumor sites, mean net costs of care were highest in the initial and last year of life phases of care and lowest in the continuing phase. Mean 5-year net costs varied widely, from less than $20 000 for patients with breast cancer or melanoma of the skin to more than $40 000 for patients with brain or other nervous system, esophageal, gastric, or ovarian cancers or lymphoma. For elderly cancer patients diagnosed in 2004, aggregate 5-year net costs of care to Medicare were estimated to be approximately $21.1 billion. Costs to Medicare were highest for lung, colorectal, and prostate cancers, reflecting underlying incidence, stage distribution at diagnosis, survival, and phase-specific costs for these tumor sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The costs of cancer care to Medicare are substantial and vary by tumor site, phase of care, stage at diagnosis, and survival.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yabroff, K. R., Lamont, E. B., Mariotto, A., Warren, J. L., Topor, M., Meekins, A., Brown, M. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost of Care for Elderly Cancer Patients in the United States]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>641</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>630</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/642?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacogenomic Variation of CYP2D6 and the Choice of Optimal Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: A Modeling Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/642?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Adjuvant endocrine treatment with aromatase inhibitors improves disease-free survival compared with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor&ndash;positive breast cancer. This difference could be due to differences in tamoxifen metabolism because levels of endoxifen, the active tamoxifen metabolite, vary with the number of mutant alleles, including the *4 allele, of the gene encoding cytochrome P450 2D6 (<I>CYP2D6</I>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We created a Markov model to determine whether tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor monotherapy maximized 5-year disease-free survival for patients with the wild-type <I>CYP2D6</I> genotype (wt/wt). Annual risks of recurrence with aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen in breast cancer patients who were not selected by <I>CYP2D6</I> genotype were derived from the Breast International Group 1-98 trial. Genotype frequencies and the hazard ratio for cancer recurrence on tamoxifen among patients with the *4/*4 genotype relative to the wt/wt or wt/*4 genotypes (HR<SUB>*4/*4</SUB> = 1.86) were based on data from an analysis of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial of adjuvant tamoxifen. We explored the impact of <I>CYP2D6</I>(*4) heterozygosity on disease-free suvival for wt/wt patients by studying a range of effect (ie, recurrence on tamoxifen) estimates, from no effect of the single mutation (Eff<SUB>wt/*4</SUB> = 0, recurrence rate in wt/*4 patients same as that in wt/wt patients) to complete effect (Eff<SUB>wt/*4</SUB> = 1 recurrence rate in wt/*4 patients same as that in *4/*4 patients).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>With HR<SUB>*4/*4</SUB> = 1.86 and Eff<SUB>wt/*4</SUB> = 0.5, the 5-year disease-free survival of tamoxifen-treated patients with no mutations (wt/wt) was 83.9%, that is, essentially the same as that (84.0%) for genotypically unselected patients who were treated with aromatase inhibitors. With greater HR<SUB>*4/*4</SUB> estimates, disease-free survival with tamoxifen exceed that with aromatase inhibitors in wt/wt patients, even at lower assumed Eff<SUB>wt/*4</SUB> ratios.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Modeling suggests that among patients who are wild type for <I>CYP2D6</I>, 5-year disease-free survival outcomes are similar to or perhaps even superior with tamoxifen than with aromatase inhibitors. Endocrine therapy tailored to CYP2D6 genotype could be considered for women who are newly diagnosed with breast cancer, particularly those who have with concerns about either the relative toxicity or the increased cost of aromatase inhibitors.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Punglia, R. S., Burstein, H. J., Winer, E. P., Weeks, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn100</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacogenomic Variation of CYP2D6 and the Choice of Optimal Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: A Modeling Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>648</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>642</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/649?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treating Metastatic Solid Tumors With Bortezomib and a Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Receptor Agonist Antibody]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/649?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Resistance of tumors to cell death signals poses a complex clinical problem. We explored the therapeutic potential and in vivo toxicity of a combination of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, and MD5-1, a tumor necrosis factor&ndash;related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor (DR5) agonist monoclonal antibody, in mouse carcinomas.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Mice bearing Renca-FLAG (renal) or 4T1 (mammary) tumors were treated with bortezomib and/or MD5-1 and examined for lung metastases (Renca-FLAG: n = 93; 4T1: n = 40) or monitored for survival (Renca-FLAG: n = 143). Toxicity was assessed by histopathology and hematology. Viability and apoptotic signaling in Renca-FLAG and 4T1 cells treated with bortezomib alone or in combination with TRAIL were analyzed using 3-[4,5-dimethyiazol-2-yl-5]-[3-carboxymethyloxyphenyl]-2-[4-sulfophenyl]-2H tetrazolium assay and by measuring mitochondrial membrane depolarization and caspase-8 and caspase-3 activation. All statistical tests were two-sided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Bortezomib (20 nM) sensitized Renca-FLAG and 4T1 cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis (mean percent decrease in numbers of viable cells, bortezomib + TRAIL vs TRAIL: Renca-FLAG, 95% vs 34%, difference = 61%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 52% to 69%, <I>P</I> &lt; .001; 4T1, 85% vs 20%, difference = 65%, 95% CI = 62% to 69%, <I>P</I> &lt; .001). Sensitization involved activation of caspase-8 and caspase-3 but not mitochondrial membrane depolarization, suggesting an amplified signaling of the extrinsic cell death pathway. Treatment with bortezomib and MD5-1 reduced lung metastases in mice carrying Renca and 4T1 tumors (mean number of metastases, bortezomib + MD5-1 vs MD5-1: Renca-FLAG, 1 vs 8, difference = 7, 95% CI = 5 to 9, <I>P</I> &lt; .001; 4T1, 1 vs 12, difference = 11, 95% CI = 9 to 12, <I>P</I> &lt; .001) and increased median survival of mice bearing Renca-FLAG tumors (bortezomib + MD5-1 vs bortezomib + control isotype antibody: 22 of 30 [73%] were still alive at day 180 vs median survival of 42 days [95% CI = 41 to 44 days, <I>P</I> &lt; .001]) in the absence of obvious toxicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Bortezomib combined with DR5 agonist monoclonal antibody may be a useful treatment for metastatic solid tumors.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shanker, A., Brooks, A. D., Tristan, C. A., Wine, J. W., Elliott, P. J., Yagita, H., Takeda, K., Smyth, M. J., Murphy, W. J., Sayers, T. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn113</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treating Metastatic Solid Tumors With Bortezomib and a Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Receptor Agonist Antibody]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>662</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>649</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/663?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Persistent Organochlorine Pesticides and Risk of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/663?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, such as persistent organochlorine pesticides, has been suggested to increase the risk of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>To study the relationship of POP exposure to TGCT risk, prediagnostic serum samples from 754 case subjects and 928 control subjects enrolled in the Servicemen&rsquo;s Testicular Tumor Environmental and Endocrine Determinants Study were analyzed for <I>cis</I>-nonachlor, <I>trans</I>-nonachlor, oxychlordane, total chlordanes, &beta;-hexachlorocyclohexane, mirex, <I>p</I>,<I>p</I>'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (<I>p</I>,<I>p</I>'-DDE), and <I>p</I>,<I>p</I>'-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of TGCT overall and for the histological subgroups, seminoma and nonseminoma, were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. All statistical tests were two-sided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>TGCT risk was statistically significantly associated with higher plasma levels of <I>p</I>,<I>p</I>'-DDE (for highest quartile [Q4] vs lowest quartile [Q1], OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.23 to 2.38, <I>P</I><SUB>trend</SUB> = .0002) and of two chlordane components, <I>cis</I>-nonachlor (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.18, <I>P</I><SUB>trend</SUB> = .009) and <I>trans</I>-nonachlor (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.07 to 2.00, <I>P</I><SUB>trend</SUB> = .026). Seminoma risk was statistically significantly associated with <I>p</I>,<I>p</I>'-DDE (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.22 to 2.99, <I>P</I><SUB>trend</SUB> = .0008), <I>cis</I>-nonachlor (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.27 to 2.93, <I>P</I><SUB>trend</SUB> = .0045), <I>trans</I>-nonachlor (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.67, <I>P</I><SUB>trend</SUB> = .033), and a chlordane metabolite, oxychlordane (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.04 to 2.60, <I>P</I><SUB>trend</SUB> = .048), whereas nonseminoma risk showed a statistically significant association with <I>p</I>,<I>p</I>'-DDE only (Q4 vs Q1, OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.10 to 2.42, <I>P</I><SUB>trend</SUB> = .0044).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Increased exposure to <I>p</I>,<I>p</I>'-DDE may be associated with the risk of both seminomatous and nonseminomatous TGCTs, whereas exposure to chlordane compounds and metabolites may be associated with the risk of seminoma. Because evidence suggests that TGCT is initiated in very early life, it is possible that exposure to these persistent organic pesticides during fetal life or via breast feeding may increase the risk of TGCT in young men.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGlynn, K. A., Quraishi, S. M., Graubard, B. I., Weber, J.-P., Rubertone, M. V., Erickson, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn101</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Persistent Organochlorine Pesticides and Risk of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>671</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>663</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/672?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intrinsic Resistance of Tumorigenic Breast Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/672?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Tumorigenic breast cancer cells that express high levels of CD44 and low or undetectable levels of CD24 (CD44<sup>&gt;</sup>/CD24<sup>&gt;/low</sup>) may be resistant to chemotherapy and therefore responsible for cancer relapse. These tumorigenic cancer cells can be isolated from breast cancer biopsies and propagated as mammospheres in vitro. In this study, we aimed to test directly in human breast cancers the effect of conventional chemotherapy or lapatinib (an epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]/HER2 pathway inhibitor) on this tumorigenic CD44<sup>&gt;</sup> and CD24<sup>&gt;/low</sup> cell population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Paired breast cancer core biopsies were obtained from patients with primary breast cancer before and after 12 weeks of treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 31) or, for patients with HER2-positive tumors, before and after 6 weeks of treatment with the EGFR/HER2 inhibitor lapatinib (n = 21). Single-cell suspensions established from these biopsies were stained with antibodies against CD24, CD44, and lineage markers and analyzed by flow cytometry. The potential of cells from biopsy samples taken before and after treatment to form mammospheres in culture was compared. All statistical tests were two-sided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Chemotherapy treatment increased the percentage of CD44<sup>&gt;</sup>/CD24<sup>&gt;/low</sup> cells (mean at baseline vs 12 weeks, 4.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.5% to 5.9%, vs 13.6%, 95% CI = 10.9% to 16.3%; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) and increased mammosphere formation efficiency (MSFE) (mean at baseline vs 12 weeks, 13.3%, 95% CI = 6.0% to 20.6%, vs 53.2%, 95% CI = 42.4% to 64.0%; <I>P</I> &lt; .001). Conversely, lapatinib treatment of patients with HER2-positive tumors led to a non&ndash;statistically significant decrease in the percentage of CD44<sup>&gt;</sup>/CD24<sup>&gt;/low</sup> cells (mean at baseline vs 6 weeks, 10.0%, 95% CI = 7.2% to 12.8%, vs 7.5%, 95% CI = 4.1% to 10.9%) and a non&ndash;statistically significant decrease in MSFE (mean at baseline vs 6 weeks, 16.1%, 95% CI = 8.7% to 23.5%, vs 10.8%, 95% CI = 4.0% to 17.6%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>These studies provide clinical evidence for a subpopulation of chemotherapy-resistant breast cancer&ndash;initiating cells. Lapatinib did not lead to an increase in these tumorigenic cells, and, in combination with conventional therapy, specific pathway inhibitors may provide a therapeutic strategy for eliminating these cells to decrease recurrence and improve long-term survival.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, X., Lewis, M. T., Huang, J., Gutierrez, C., Osborne, C. K., Wu, M.-F., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Pavlick, A., Zhang, X., Chamness, G. C., Wong, H., Rosen, J., Chang, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn123</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intrinsic Resistance of Tumorigenic Breast Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>679</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>672</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/680?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re: HER2 Status and Efficacy of Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/680?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mehta, R. S., Schubbert, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn107</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re: HER2 Status and Efficacy of Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>680</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>680</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/680-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response:Re: HER2 Status and Efficacy of Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/680-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gennari, A., Sormani, M. P., Pronzato, P., Bruzzi, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn108</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response:Re: HER2 Status and Efficacy of Adjuvant Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Randomized Trials]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>681</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>680</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/681?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re: Adaptive Therapy for Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Selection Trial of Four Regimens]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/681?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Armstrong, A. J., Garrett-Mayer, E. L., Eisenberger, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn104</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re: Adaptive Therapy for Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Selection Trial of Four Regimens]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>682</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>681</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/682?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response:Re: Adaptive Therapy for Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Selection Trial of Four Regimens]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/682?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Millikan, R. E., Logothetis, C. J., Thall, P. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn105</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response:Re: Adaptive Therapy for Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Selection Trial of Four Regimens]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>683</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>682</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/683?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re: Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in African American Women]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/683?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Levine, B. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn106</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re: Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in African American Women]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>684</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>683</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/683-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re: Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Sequential or Concurrent Anthracycline and Docetaxel: Breast International Group 02-98 Randomized Trial]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/683-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sari, E., Bulut, N., Altundag, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn109</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re: Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Sequential or Concurrent Anthracycline and Docetaxel: Breast International Group 02-98 Randomized Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>683</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>683</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/684?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response:Re: Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in African American Women]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/684?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gail, M. H., Bernstein, L., Costantino, J. P., Pee, D., Ursin, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response:Re: Projecting Individualized Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in African American Women]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>684</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>684</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/685?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Erratum]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/685?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn126</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Erratum]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>685</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>685</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/685-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Erratum]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/685-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn128</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Erratum]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>685</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>685</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/685-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clarification]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/9/685-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn133</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clarification]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>685</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>685</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/519?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/519?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn116</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>519</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>519</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>IN THIS ISSUE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/519-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High-Intensity Chemotherapy Does Not Improve Survival in Small Cell Lung Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/519-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn136</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High-Intensity Chemotherapy Does Not Improve Survival in Small Cell Lung Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>519</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>519</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MEMO TO THE MEDIA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/519-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estrogen Therapy Increases Benign Breast Disease]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/519-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn137</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estrogen Therapy Increases Benign Breast Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>519</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>519</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MEMO TO THE MEDIA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/520?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diseases Desperate Grown]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/520?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bunn, P. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn082</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diseases Desperate Grown]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>521</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>520</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/521?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can Early Response Assessment Guide Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer?]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/521?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Esteva, F. J., Hortobagyi, G. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn098</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can Early Response Assessment Guide Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>523</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>521</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/524?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Yuan Chang and Patrick Moore: Teaming Up To Hunt Down Cancer-Causing Viruses]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/524?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schmidt, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn122</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Yuan Chang and Patrick Moore: Teaming Up To Hunt Down Cancer-Causing Viruses]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>529</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>524</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/526?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Filling the Gaps To Fight Cervical Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/526?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beres, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Filling the Gaps To Fight Cervical Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>528</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>526</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/528?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hepatitis B Virus-Induced Liver Cancer in Asian Americans: A Preventable Disease]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/528?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McBride, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn120</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hepatitis B Virus-Induced Liver Cancer in Asian Americans: A Preventable Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>529</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>528</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/530?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Doctors Seek To Prevent Breast Cancer Recurrence by Lowering Insulin Levels]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/530?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hede, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn119</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Doctors Seek To Prevent Breast Cancer Recurrence by Lowering Insulin Levels]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>532</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>530</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/531?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stat Bite: Estimated New Leukemia Cases in 2008]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/531?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn111</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stat Bite: Estimated New Leukemia Cases in 2008]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>531</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>531</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/532?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Awards, Appointments, Announcements]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/532?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn117</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Awards, Appointments, Announcements]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>532</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>532</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/532-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/532-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn118</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>532</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>532</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/533?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Threefold Dose Intensity Treatment With Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide for Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Trial]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/533?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The dose intensity of chemotherapy can be increased to the highest possible level by early administration of multiple and sequential high-dose cycles supported by transfusion with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs). A randomized trial was performed to test the impact of such dose intensification on the long-term survival of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients who had limited or extensive SCLC with no more than two metastatic sites were randomly assigned to high-dose (High, n = 69) or standard-dose (Std, n = 71) chemotherapy with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE). High-ICE cycles were supported by transfusion with PBPCs that were collected after two cycles of treatment with epidoxorubicin at 150 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, paclitaxel at 175 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, and filgrastim. The primary outcome was 3-year survival. Comparisons between response rates and toxic effects within subgroups (limited or extensive disease, liver metastases or no liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, normal or abnormal lactate dehydrogenase levels) were also performed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Median relative dose intensity in the High-ICE arm was 293% (range = 174%&ndash;392%) of that in the Std-ICE arm. The 3-year survival rates were 18% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 10% to 29%) and 19% (95% CI = 11% to 30%) in the High-ICE and Std-ICE arms, respectively. No differences were observed between the High-ICE and Std-ICE arms in overall response (n = 54 [78%, 95% CI = 67% to 87%] and n = 48 [68%, 95% CI = 55% to 78%], respectively) or complete response (n = 27 [39%, 95% CI = 28% to 52%] and n = 24 [34%, 95% CI = 23% to 46%], respectively). Subgroup analyses showed no benefit for any outcome from High-ICE treatment. Hematologic toxicity was substantial in the Std-ICE arm (grade &ge; 3 neutropenia, n = 49 [70%]; anemia, n = 17 [25%]; thrombopenia, n = 17 [25%]), and three patients (4%) died from toxicity. High-ICE treatment was predictably associated with severe myelosuppression, and five patients (8%) died from toxicity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The long-term outcome of SCLC was not improved by raising the dose intensity of ICE chemotherapy by threefold.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leyvraz, S., Pampallona, S., Martinelli, G., Ploner, F., Perey, L., Aversa, S., Peters, S., Brunsvig, P., Montes, A., Lange, A., Yilmaz, U., Rosti, G., On behalf of the Solid Tumors Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn088</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Threefold Dose Intensity Treatment With Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide for Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>541</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>533</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/542?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neoadjuvant Vinorelbine-Capecitabine Versus Docetaxel-Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide in Early Nonresponsive Breast Cancer: Phase III Randomized GeparTrio Trial]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/542?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Among breast cancer patients, nonresponse to initial neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with unfavorable outcome. We compared the response of nonresponding patients who continued the same treatment with that of patients who switched to a well-tolerated non&ndash;cross-resistant regimen.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Previously untreated breast cancer patients received two 3-week cycles of docetaxel at 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, doxorubicin at 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, and cyclophosphamide at 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> per day (TAC). Patients whose tumors did not decrease in size by at least 50% were randomly assigned to four additional cycles of TAC or to four cycles of vinorelbine at 25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and capecitabine at 2000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (NX). The outcome was sonographic response, defined as a reduction in the product of the two largest perpendicular diameters by at least 50%. A difference of 10% or less in the sonographic response qualified as noninferiority of the NX treatment. Pathological complete response was defined as no invasive or in situ residual tumor masses in the breast and lymph nodes. Toxic effects were assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of 2090 patients enrolled in the GeparTrio study, 622 (29.8%) who did not respond to two initial cycles of TAC were randomly assigned to an additional four cycles of TAC (n = 321) or to four cycles of NX (n = 301). Sonographic response rate was 50.5% for the TAC arm and 51.2% for the NX arm. The difference of 0.7% (95% confidence interval = &ndash;7.1% to 8.5%) demonstrated noninferiority of NX (<I>P</I> = .008). Similar numbers of patients in both arms received breast-conserving surgery (184 [57.3%] in the TAC arm vs 180 [59.8%] in the NX arm) and had a pathological complete response (5.3% vs 6.0%). Fewer patients in the NX arm than in the TAC arm had hematologic toxic effects, mucositis, infections, and nail changes, but more had hand&ndash;foot syndrome and sensory neuropathy.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Pathological complete responses to both regimens were marginal. Among patients who did not respond to the initial neoadjuvant TAC treatment, similar efficacy but better tolerability was observed by switching to NX than continuing with TAC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[von Minckwitz, G., Kummel, S., Vogel, P., Hanusch, C., Eidtmann, H., Hilfrich, J., Gerber, B., Huober, J., Costa, S. D., Jackisch, C., Loibl, S., Mehta, K., Kaufmann, M., On behalf of the German Breast Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn085</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neoadjuvant Vinorelbine-Capecitabine Versus Docetaxel-Doxorubicin-Cyclophosphamide in Early Nonresponsive Breast Cancer: Phase III Randomized GeparTrio Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>551</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>542</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/552?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intensified Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Responding Breast Cancer: Phase III Randomized GeparTrio Study]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/552?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Patients with an early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have chemosensitive tumors and a high probability for a pathological complete response at surgery. The relationship between extended chemotherapy and pathological complete response at surgery was investigated in a clinical trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Untreated breast cancer patients received two 3-week cycles of docetaxel at 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, doxorubicin at 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, and cyclophosphamide at 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (TAC). Those whose tumor size decreased by 50% or more by sonographic measurement (ie, reduction in the product of the two largest perpendicular diameters by at least 50%) were classified as responders and randomly assigned to receive four or six more cycles of TAC, for a total of six or eight TAC cycles. The primary aim was to increase the rate of a pathological complete response (defined as no invasive or in situ residual tumor masses in the breast and lymph nodes) from 20% to 26%. Sonographic response rates and rates of breast-conserving surgery and adverse effects were also assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 2090 patients in the GeparTrio trial, 1390 (66.5%) were randomly assigned as responders after two initial TAC cycles to receive an additional four (n = 704) or six (n = 686) TAC cycles. Rates of pathological complete response were not statistically significantly different between the arms (21.0% with six TAC cycles and 23.5% with eight TAC cycles; difference = 2.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = &ndash;1.8% to 6.8%; <I>P</I> = .27). More clinical (48.2% vs 52.9%, difference = 4.7%; 95% CI = &ndash;0.55% to 9.95%; <I>P</I> = .08) and sonographic (22.6% vs 27.6%, difference = 5%; 95% CI = 0.45% to 9.55%; <I>P</I> = .033) complete responses at surgery were observed with eight TAC cycles than with six TAC cycles. The rate of breast-conserving surgery was similar in both arms (67.5% vs 68.5%, respectively, <I>P</I> = .68). Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia and edema and various grade 1 or 2 adverse events were more frequent in patients receiving eight TAC cycles than in those receiving six cycles.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Patients receiving eight TAC cycles had statistically significantly higher sonographic response rates but not pathological complete response rates than those receiving six TAC cycles. However, they also had more toxic effects. So far, eight cycles of TAC cannot be recommended for the whole group of patients responding to two initial cycles of TAC.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[von Minckwitz, G., Kummel, S., Vogel, P., Hanusch, C., Eidtmann, H., Hilfrich, J., Gerber, B., Huober, J., Costa, S. D., Jackisch, C., Loibl, S., Mehta, K., Manfred Kaufmann; for the German Breast Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn089</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intensified Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Responding Breast Cancer: Phase III Randomized GeparTrio Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>562</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>552</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/563?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Conjugated Equine Estrogen and Risk of Benign Proliferative Breast Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/563?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Estrogens stimulate proliferation of breast epithelium and may therefore increase the risk of benign proliferative breast disease, a condition that is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. We tested the effect of conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) on risk of benign proliferative breast disease in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized controlled trial.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In the WHI CEE trial, 10739 postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to 0.625 mg/d of CEE or to placebo. Baseline and annual breast examinations and mammograms were required. We identified women in the trial who reported breast biopsies that were free of cancer, obtained the associated histological sections, and subjected them to standardized central review. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>A total of 232 incident cases of benign proliferative breast disease were ascertained during follow-up (average duration, 6.9 years), with 155 in the CEE group and 77 in the placebo group. Use of CEE was associated with a more than two-fold increase in the risk of benign proliferative breast disease (HR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.58 to 2.81). For benign proliferative breast disease without atypia, the HR was 2.34 (95% CI = 1.71 to 3.20), whereas for atypical hyperplasia, it was 1.12 (95% CI = 0.53 to 2.40). Risk varied little by levels of baseline characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Use of 0.625 mg/d of CEE was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of benign proliferative breast disease.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rohan, T. E., Negassa, A., Chlebowski, R. T., Habel, L., McTiernan, A., Ginsberg, M., Wassertheil-Smoller, S., Page, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn075</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Conjugated Equine Estrogen and Risk of Benign Proliferative Breast Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>571</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>563</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/572?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Donation Frequency, Iron Loss, and Risk of Cancer Among Blood Donors]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/572?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Long-term deleterious effects of repeated blood donations may be masked by the donors&rsquo; healthy lifestyle. To investigate possible effects of blood donation and iron loss through blood donation on cancer incidence while minimizing "healthy donor effects," we made dose&ndash;response comparisons within a cohort of Swedish and Danish blood donors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We used a nested case&ndash;control study design, in which case patients were defined as all donors who were diagnosed with a malignancy between their first recorded blood donation and study termination (n = 10866). Control subjects (n = 107140) were individually matched on sex, age, and county of residence. Using conditional logistic regression, we estimated relative risks of cancer according to number of blood donations made or estimated iron loss 3&ndash;12 years before a case patient was diagnosed with cancer. All statistical tests were two-sided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>No clear association was observed between number of donations and risk of cancer overall. However, between the lowest (&le;median, &lt;0.75 g) and highest (&gt;90th percentile, &gt;2.7 g) categories of estimated iron loss, there was a trend (<I>P</I><SUB>trend</SUB> &lt; .001) of decreasing risk for cancers of the liver, lung, colon, stomach, and esophagus, which are thought to be promoted by iron overload (combined odds ratio [OR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58 to 0.84), but only among men and only with a latency of 3&ndash;7 years. The risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma was higher among frequent plasma donors (&gt;25 vs 0 donations, OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.22 to 3.74).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Repeated blood donation was not associated with increased or decreased risk of cancer overall. The lack of consistency across latency periods casts doubt on an apparent association between reduced cancer risk and iron loss in men. The positive association between frequent plasma donation and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma deserves further exploration.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edgren, G., Reilly, M., Hjalgrim, H., Tran, T. N., Rostgaard, K., Adami, J., Titlestad, K., Shanwell, A., Melbye, M., Nyren, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn084</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Donation Frequency, Iron Loss, and Risk of Cancer Among Blood Donors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>579</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>572</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/580?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mechanism of Synergy of N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Retinamide and ABT-737 in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cell Lines: Mcl-1 Inactivation]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/580?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>ABT-737 is a pan-Bcl-2 inhibitor that has a wide range of single-agent activity against acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell lines and xenografts. A relationship between expression of myeloid cell leukemia 1 (Mcl-1), an antiapoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family of proteins, and resistance to ABT-737 has been reported for various cancers. The synthetic cytotoxic retinoid <I>N</I>-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide (4-HPR) is known to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), and ROS have been shown to activate c-Jun kinase (JNK), which in turn phosphorylates and inhibits Mcl-1. Thus, we investigated whether 4-HPR&ndash;mediated inactivation of Mcl-1 could act synergistically with ABT-737 to promote leukemia cell death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Cytotoxicity was determined using the fluorescence-based DIMSCAN assay. Synergy was defined as a combination index (CIN) less than 1. The expression of Bcl-2 family messenger RNAs was measured by real-time reverse transcription&ndash;polymerase chain reaction, and caspase activity was measured enzymatically. Changes in Bcl-2 family proteins and release of mitochondrial cytochrome <I>c</I> were detected by immunoblotting. ROS, apoptosis, mitochondrial membrane depolarization, and phospho-JNK were measured by flow cytometry. Gene silencing was by small interfering RNA (siRNA). All statistical tests were two-sided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>ABT-737 decreased Mcl-1 protein expression in ABT-737&ndash;sensitive ALL cell lines but not in ABT-737&ndash;resistant lines. Using the antioxidant ascorbic acid and siRNA-mediated knockdown of JNK, we showed that 4-HPR decreased Mcl-1 via ROS generation (that phosphorylates JNK) in ABT-737-resistant cell lines. Combining ABT-737 with 4-HPR enhanced the mitochondrial apoptotic cascade (percentage of cells with depolarized mitochondrial membrane at 6 hours, ABT-737 vs ABT-737 plus 4-HPR: 24.5% vs 45.5%, difference = 20.1%, 95% CI = 18.9% to 13.9%; <I>P</I> &lt; .001) and caused caspase-dependent, synergistic multilog cytotoxicity in all seven ALL cell lines examined (mean CIN = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.87), with minimal cytotoxicity for normal lymphocytes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>An increase of Mcl-1 protein in response to ABT-737 is one mechanism of ABT-737 resistance that can be overcome by 4-HPR, resulting in synergistic cytotoxicity of ABT-737 combined with 4-HPR in ALL cell lines.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kang, M. H., Wan, Z., Kang, Y. H., Sposto, R., Reynolds, C. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn076</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mechanism of Synergy of N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)Retinamide and ABT-737 in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cell Lines: Mcl-1 Inactivation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>595</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>580</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/596?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re: Breast Cancer Incidence, 1980-2006: Combined Roles of Menopausal Hormone Therapy, Screening Mammography, and Estrogen Receptor Status]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/596?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chu, D. Z. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re: Breast Cancer Incidence, 1980-2006: Combined Roles of Menopausal Hormone Therapy, Screening Mammography, and Estrogen Receptor Status]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>597</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>596</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/596-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re: Breast Cancer Incidence, 1980-2006: Combined Roles of Menopausal Hormone Therapy, Screening Mammography, and Estrogen Receptor Status]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/596-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byers, T., Trujillo, S., Hines, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn078</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re: Breast Cancer Incidence, 1980-2006: Combined Roles of Menopausal Hormone Therapy, Screening Mammography, and Estrogen Receptor Status]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>596</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>596</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/597?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re: Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/597?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caan, B., Habel, L., Quesenberry, C., Kushi, L., Herrinton, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re: Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>598</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>597</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/598?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re: Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/598?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vaidya, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn080</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re: Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>599</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>598</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/599?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response: Re: Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/599?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerlikowske, K., Buist, D. S. M., Walker, R., Miglioretti, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn081</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response: Re: Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>599</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>599</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/600?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response: Re: Second Cancers Among 104760 Survivors of Cervical Cancer: Evaluation of Long-Term Risk]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/600?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaturvedi, A. K., Engels, E. A., Gilbert, E. S., Chen, B. E., Storm, H., Lynch, C. F., Hall, P., Langmark, F., Pukkala, E., Kaijser, M., Andersson, M., Fossa, S. D., Joensuu, H., Boice, J. D., Kleinerman, R. A., Travis, L. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn086</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response: Re: Second Cancers Among 104760 Survivors of Cervical Cancer: Evaluation of Long-Term Risk]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>601</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>600</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/600-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Re: Second Cancers Among 104760 Survivors of Cervical Cancer: Evaluation of Long-Term Risk]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/8/600-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cai, T., Mazzoli, S., Bartoletti, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Re: Second Cancers Among 104760 Survivors of Cervical Cancer: Evaluation of Long-Term Risk]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>600</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>600</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/447?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/447?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn090</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[IN THIS ISSUE]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>447</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>447</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>IN THIS ISSUE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/447-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Uneven Use of Less Invasive Breast Cancer Staging Test Reported]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/447-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn114</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Uneven Use of Less Invasive Breast Cancer Staging Test Reported]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>447</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>447</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MEMO TO THE MEDIA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/447-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hormone Replacement Therapy Increases Breast Cancer Recurrence]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/447-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Savage, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn115</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hormone Replacement Therapy Increases Breast Cancer Recurrence]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>447</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>447</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MEMO TO THE MEDIA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/449?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early Adoption and Disturbing Disparities in Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/449?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edge, S. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early Adoption and Disturbing Disparities in Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>450</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>449</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/451?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Should Observational Studies Be a Thing of the Past?]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/451?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pritchard, K. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn074</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Should Observational Studies Be a Thing of the Past?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>452</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>451</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/452?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Separation of Health and Statistics]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/452?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Church, T. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn073</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Separation of Health and Statistics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>453</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>452</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/454?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prevention, Survivorship Highlighted in England's Cancer Plan Update]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/454?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Travis, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prevention, Survivorship Highlighted in England's Cancer Plan Update]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>455</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>454</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/456?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Biomarker Developers Face Big Hurdles]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/456?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tuma, R. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn095</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Biomarker Developers Face Big Hurdles]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>461</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>456</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/457?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interdisciplinary Team To Tackle Fertility Issues in Cancer Survivors]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/457?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn094</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interdisciplinary Team To Tackle Fertility Issues in Cancer Survivors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>458</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>457</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/459?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anthracycline Therapy May Be Avoidable in Early Breast Cancer, New Studies Suggest]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/459?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tuma, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn092</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anthracycline Therapy May Be Avoidable in Early Breast Cancer, New Studies Suggest]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>461</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>459</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/460?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stat Bite: Medicaid Coverage of Tobacco-Dependence Treatments]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/460?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn083</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stat Bite: Medicaid Coverage of Tobacco-Dependence Treatments]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>460</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>460</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/461?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Awards, Appointments, Announcements]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/461?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Awards, Appointments, Announcements]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>461</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>461</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEWS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/462?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disparities and Trends in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Among Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients (1998-2005)]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/462?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), an acceptable alternative to axillary lymph node dissection for staging patients with breast cancer, was introduced to clinical practice in the late 1990s. We assessed demographic, clinical, and facility-related factors associated with SLNB in women with early-stage breast cancer and evaluated trends in these factors over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data on early-stage breast cancers (T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2N0) diagnosed between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2005, were extracted from the National Cancer Database, a hospital-based registry. Patient demographics, tumor stage, type of lymph node surgery, type of breast cancer surgery, health insurance, treatment facility type, and area-level education and income variables were collected. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess predictive factors associated with SLNB, temporal differences in factors associated with SLNB, and differences in rates of SLNB by facility type, race/ethnicity, and type of health insurance over time.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The total analytic study population included 490 899 women. The use of SLNB increased from 26.8% in 1998 to 65.5% in 2005. Factors associated with lower likelihood of SLNB over the study period included being older (odds ratio [OR] = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.78 to 0.92 for those aged 72 or older compared with those aged 51 or younger), being of racial/ethnic minority (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.78 for African Americans compared with whites), having no health insurance (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.80 for uninsured compared with having private insurance), having certain government insurance plans (for Medicaid, OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.84, and for Medicare at age &lt;65 years, OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.87, both compared with private insurance), residing in zip codes with lower proportion of high school graduates (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.86 to 0.89) or with lower median income (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.81), and receiving treatment in facility types other than a teaching or research hospital (for community hospital, OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.86; for community cancer center, OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.87). The associations with insurance status and sociodemographic characteristics were more pronounced in 2005 than in 1998. For example, the adjusted annual rates of SLNB in 1998 were 0.29 in whites, 0.26 in African Americans, and 0.35 in Hispanics; in 2005 the respective rates were 0.70, 0.64, and 0.67.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Although use of SLNB increased from 1998 to 2005, disparities persisted in receipt of SLNB that are based on nonclinical factors, including sociodemographic characteristics and insurance status.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, A. Y., Halpern, M. T., Schrag, N. M., Stewart, A., Leitch, M., Ward, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disparities and Trends in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Among Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients (1998-2005)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>474</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>462</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/475?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increased Risk of Recurrence After Hormone Replacement Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/475?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Hormone replacement therapy (HT) is known to increase the risk of breast cancer in healthy women, but its effect on breast cancer risk in breast cancer survivors is less clear. The randomized HABITS study, which compared HT for menopausal symptoms with best management without hormones among women with previously treated breast cancer, was stopped early due to suspicions of an increased risk of new breast cancer events following HT. We present results after extended follow-up.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>HABITS was a randomized, non&ndash;placebo-controlled noninferiority trial that aimed to be at a power of 80% to detect a 36% increase in the hazard ratio (HR) for a new breast cancer event following HT. Cox models were used to estimate relative risks of a breast cancer event, the maximum likelihood method was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and <sup>2</sup> tests were used to assess statistical significance, with all <I>P</I> values based on two-sided tests. The absolute risk of a new breast cancer event was estimated with the cumulative incidence function. Most patients who received HT were prescribed continuous combined or sequential estradiol hemihydrate and norethisterone.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 447 women randomly assigned, 442 could be followed for a median of 4 years. Thirty-nine of the 221 women in the HT arm and 17 of the 221 women in the control arm experienced a new breast cancer event (HR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.3 to 4.2). Cumulative incidences at 5 years were 22.2% in the HT arm and 8.0% in the control arm. By the end of follow-up, six women in the HT arm had died of breast cancer and six were alive with distant metastases. In the control arm, five women had died of breast cancer and four had metastatic breast cancer (<I>P</I> = .51, log-rank test).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>After extended follow-up, there was a clinically and statistically significant increased risk of a new breast cancer event in survivors who took HT.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holmberg, L., Iversen, O.-E., Rudenstam, C. M., Hammar, M., Kumpulainen, E., Jaskiewicz, J., Jassem, J., Dobaczewska, D., Fjosne, H. E., Peralta, O., Arriagada, R., Holmqvist, M., Maenpa, J., On behalf of the HABITS Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increased Risk of Recurrence After Hormone Replacement Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>482</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>475</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/483?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials in Cancer: A Review of Current Practices]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/483?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Previous reviews have identified problems in the design and analysis of group-randomized trials in a number of areas. Similar problems may exist in cancer research, but there have been no comprehensive reviews.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We searched Medline and PubMed for group-randomized trials focused on cancer prevention and control that were published between 2002 and 2006. We located and reviewed 75 articles to determine whether articles included evidence of taking group randomization into account in establishing the size of the trial, such as reporting the expected intraclass correlation, the group component of variance, or the variance inflation factor. We also examined the analytical approaches to determine their appropriateness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Only 18 (24%) of the 75 articles documented appropriate methods for sample size calculations. Only 34 (45%) limited their reports to analyses judged to be appropriate. Fully 26 (34%) failed to report any analyses that were judged to be appropriate. The most commonly used inappropriate analysis was an analysis at the individual level that ignored the groups altogether. Nine articles (12%) did not provide sufficient information.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Many investigators who use group-randomized trials in cancer research do not adequately attend to the special design and analytic challenges associated with these trials. Failure to do so can lead to reporting type I errors as real effects, mislead investigators and policy-makers, and slow progress toward control and prevention of cancer. A collaborative effort by investigators, statisticians, and others will be required to ensure that group-randomized trials are planned and analyzed using appropriate methods so that the scientific community can have confidence in the published results.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murray, D. M., Pals, S. L., Blitstein, J. L., Alfano, C. M., Lehman, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials in Cancer: A Review of Current Practices]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>491</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>483</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/492?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Results at Recruitment From a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Human Papillomavirus Testing Alone With Conventional Cytology as the Primary Cervical Cancer Screening Test]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/492?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>In the first recruitment phase of a randomized trial of cervical cancer screening methods (New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening [NTCC] study), we compared screening with conventional cytology with screening by human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in combination with liquid-based cytology. HPV-positive women were directly referred to colposcopy if aged 35 or older; if younger, they were retested after 1 year.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>In the second recruitment phase of NTCC, we randomly assigned women to conventional cytology (n = 24661) with referral to colposcopy if cytology indicated atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or more severe abnormality or to testing for high-risk HPV DNA alone by Hybrid Capture 2 (n = 24535) with referral to colposcopy if the test was positive at a concentration of HPV DNA 1 pg/mL or greater. For the main endpoint of the study, histologic detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or more (CIN2+), we calculated and compared sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the two screening methods using HPV DNA cutoffs of 1 pg/mL and 2 pg/mL. All statistical tests were two-sided.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>For women aged 35&ndash;60 years, the relative sensitivity of HPV testing for detection of CIN2+ at a cutoff of 1 pg/mL vs conventional cytology was 1.92 (95% CI = 1.28 to 2.87) and the relative PPV was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.55 to 1.18). At a cutoff of 2 pg/mL HPV DNA, the relative sensitivity was 1.81 (95% CI = 1.20 to 2.72) and the relative PPV was 0.99 (95% CI = 0.67 to 1.46). In this age group, there was no evidence of heterogeneity between study phases. Among women aged 25&ndash;34 years, the relative sensitivity for detection of CIN2+ of HPV testing at a cutoff of 1 pg/mL vs cytology was 3.50 (95% CI = 2.11 to 5.82), statistically significantly larger (<I>P</I> = .019) than that observed in phase 1 at this age (1.58; 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.44).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>For women aged 35&ndash;60 years, HPV testing with a cutoff of 2 pg/mL achieves a substantial gain in sensitivity over cytology with only a small reduction in PPV. Among women aged 25&ndash;34 years, the large relative sensitivity of HPV testing compared with conventional cytology and the difference between relative sensitivity during phases 1 and 2 suggests that there is frequent regression of CIN2+ that are detected by direct referral of younger HPV-positive women to colposcopy. Thus, triage test or repeat testing is needed if HPV is to be used for primary testing in this context.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronco, G., Giorgi-Rossi, P., Carozzi, F., Confortini, M., Palma, P. D., Del Mistro, A., Gillio-Tos, A., Minucci, D., Naldoni, C., Rizzolo, R., Schincaglia, P., Volante, R., Zappa, M., Zorzi, M., Cuzick, J., Segnan, N., On behalf of the New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening Working Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Results at Recruitment From a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Human Papillomavirus Testing Alone With Conventional Cytology as the Primary Cervical Cancer Screening Test]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>501</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>492</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/502?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Autocrine and Paracrine Chemokine Receptor 7 Activation in Head and Neck Cancer: Implications for Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/502?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) mediates survival and invasiveness of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) to regional lymph nodes. Constitutive prosurvival signaling by the phosphoinositide-3 kinase/Akt pathway has been observed in SCCHN cells independent of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Human SCCHN cell lines were treated with agents that block or activate CCR7-mediated signaling, and Akt activation, cell viability in the presence or absence of EGFR inhibition, and cisplatin-induced apoptosis (in the presence or absence of Akt inhibition) were assessed by immunoblotting, the MTT assay, and the detection of annexin V, respectively. Expression and secretion of chemokines by primary tumors, metastatic nodes, and benign nodes of patients with SCCHN were determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. The role of paracrine activation of CCR7 on tumor growth was analyzed by comparing the growth of orthotopic tumors derived from B7E3 murine oral carcinoma cells in wild-type BALB/c mice, in paucity of lymphoid T cell (<I>plt</I>, deficient in CCL19 and CCL21 expression) mice, and in <I>plt</I> mice in which the implanted B7E3 cells overexpressed CCR7 (n = 14 mice per group).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In the absence of exogenous ligand treatment, blockade of CCR7 signaling reduced levels of phosphorylated (activated) Akt and decreased SCCHN cell viability by up to 59% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 58.2% to 59.8%), enhancing the effect of EGFR inhibition. CCR7 stimulation protected metastatic SCCHN cells from cisplatin-induced apoptosis in an Akt-dependent manner. Metastatic nodes expressed and secreted higher levels of CCL19 than benign nodes or primary tumors. CCR7-positive murine SCCHN tumors grew more slowly in <I>plt</I> mice than in control BALB/c mice (mean average tumor volume on day 20 = 12.2 and 26.5 mm<sup>3</sup>, respectively; difference = 14.3 mm<sup>3</sup>, 95% CI = 12.3 to 17.1 mm<sup>3</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Secretion of CCL19 and CCL21 by SCCHN cells and by paracrine sources combine to promote activation of CCR7 prosurvival signaling associated with tumor progression and disease relapse. CCR7 and its cognate chemokines may be useful biomarkers of SCCHN progression, and blockade of CCR7-mediated signaling may enhance the efficacy of platinum- and EGFR-based therapies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, J., Seethala, R. R., Zhang, Q., Gooding, W., van Waes, C., Hasegawa, H., Ferris, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Autocrine and Paracrine Chemokine Receptor 7 Activation in Head and Neck Cancer: Implications for Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>512</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>502</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/513?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rapid Clearance of Human Papillomavirus and Implications for Clinical Focus on Persistent Infections]]></title>
<link>http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/100/7/513?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Health professionals and the public need to understand the natural history of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections of the cervix to best use the information provided by new molecular screening tests. We investigated outcomes of 800 carcinogenic HPV infections detected in 599 women at enrollment into a population-based cohort (Guanacaste, Costa Rica). For individual infections, we calculated cumulative proportions of three outcomes (viral clearance, persistence without cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse [CIN2+], or persistence with new diagnosis of CIN2+) at successive 6-month time points for the first 30 months of follow-up. Cervical specimens were tested for carcinogenic HPV genotypes using an L1 degenerate-primer polymerase chain reaction method. Infections typically cleared rapidly, with 67% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 63% to 70%) clearing by 12 months. However, among infections that persisted at least 12 months, the risk of CIN2+ diagnosis by 30 months was 21% (95% CI = 15% to 28%). The risk of CIN2+ diagnosis was highest among women younger than 30 years with HPV-16 infections that persisted for at least 12 months (53%; 95% CI = 29% to 76%). These findings suggest that the medical community should emphasize persistence of cervical HPV infection, not single-time detection of HPV, in management strategies and health messages.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodriguez, A. C., Schiffman, M., Herrero, R., Wacholder, S., Hildesheim, A., Castle, P. E., Solomon, D., Burk, R., On behalf of the Proyecto Epidemiologico Guanacaste Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/jnci/djn044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rapid Clearance of Human Papillomavirus and Implications for Clinical Focus on Persistent Infections]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>National Cancer Institute</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>100</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>517</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>513</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BRIEF COMMUNICATION</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>