Skip Navigation



Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access published online on February 24, 2009

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, doi:10.1093/jnci/djn509
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Erratum (v101,p833)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/5/350    most recent
djn509v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vlashi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Pajonk, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vlashi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Pajonk, F.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLES

In Vivo Imaging, Tracking, and Targeting of Cancer Stem Cells

Erina Vlashi, Kwanghee Kim, Chann Lagadec, Lorenza Della Donna, John Tyson McDonald, Mansoureh Eghbali, James W. Sayre, Encrico Stefani, William McBride, Frank Pajonk

Affiliations of authors: Division of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology (EV, KK, CL, LDD, JTM, WM, FP), Department of Anesthesiology (ME, ES), David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Biostatistics and Radiological Sciences, School of Public Health (JWS), University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center (WM, FP), University of California, Los Angeles

Correspondence to: Frank Pajonk, MD, PhD, Division of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1714 (e-mail: fpajonk{at}mednet.ucla.edu).

Background: There is increasing evidence that solid cancers contain cancer-initiating cells (CICs) that are capable of regenerating a tumor that has been surgically removed and/or treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Currently, cell surface markers, like CD133 or CD44, are used to identify CICs in vitro; however, these markers cannot be used to identify and track CICs in vivo. The 26S proteasome is the main regulator of many processes within a proliferating cell, and its activity may be altered depending on the phenotype of a cell.

Methods: Human glioma and breast cancer cells were engineered to stably express ZsGreen fused to the carboxyl-terminal degron of ornithine decarboxylase, resulting in a fluorescent fusion protein that accumulates in cells in the absence of 26S proteasome activity; activities of individual proteases were monitored in a plate reader by detecting the cleavage of fluorogenic peptide substrates. Proteasome subunit expression in cells expressing the fusion protein was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription—polymerase chain reaction, and the stem cell phenotype of CICs was assessed by a sphere formation assay, by immunohistochemical staining for known stem cell markers in vitro, and by analyzing their tumorigenicity in vivo. CICs were tracked by in vivo fluorescence imaging after radiation treatment of tumor-bearing mice and targeted specifically via a thymidine kinase–degron fusion construct. All P values were derived from two-sided tests.

Results: Cancer cells grown as sphere cultures in conditions, which enrich for cancer stem cells (CSCs), had decreased proteasome activity relative to the respective monolayers (percent decrease in chymotryptic-like activity of sphere cultures relative to monolayers—U87MG: 26.64%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.19 to 43.10, GL261, 52.91%, 95% CI = 28.38 to 77.43). The cancer cells with low proteasome activity can thus be monitored in vitro and in vivo by the accumulation of a fluorescent protein (ZsGreen) fused to a degron that targets it for 26S proteasome degradation. In vitro, ZsGreen-positive cells had increased sphere-forming capacity, expressed CSC markers, and lacked differentiation markers compared with ZsGreen-negative cells. In vivo, ZsGreen-positive cells were approximately 100-fold more tumorigenic than ZsGreen-negative cells when injected into nude mice (ZsGreen positive, 30 mice per group; ZsGreen negative, 31 mice per group), and the number of CICs in tumors increased after 72 hours post radiation treatment. CICs were selectively targeted via a proteasome-dependent suicide gene, and their elimination in vivo led to tumor regression.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that reduced 26S proteasome activity is a general feature of CICs that can easily be exploited to identify, track, and target them in vitro and in vivo.



Context and Caveats

Prior knowledge

It had become evident that in many solid cancers there are small subpopulations of cells with stem cell–like properties known as cancer initiating cells (CICs) (or cancer stem cells [CSCs]) that are relatively resistant to conventional cancer therapies. Methods to identify and track these cells in vivo were lacking.

Study design

Cancer cells were engineered to express a fluorescent protein that is a target of the 26S protesome, a multiprotein complex which appeared to have reduced proteolytic activity in CICs. The correlation of various CIC/CSC phenotypes in the engineered cells with fluorescence, and thus 26S proteosome activity, was assessed.

Contribution

This study found that reduced 26S proteosome activity was closely correlated with CIC phenotypes in glioma and breast cancer cells. Thus, engineering cells to express a substrate of the protease is a viable method to identify and track these cell populations in vivo.

Implications

The ability to identify and track CICs in animal models of cancer may allow better assessment of therapeutic approaches compared to conventional methods such as measuring tumor response.

Limitations

The CICs with low protease activity may themselves be a heterogenous population of cells that needs to be further defined.

From the Editors

 
Manuscript received July 3, 2008; revised November 24, 2008; accepted December 31, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Article in JNCI

IN THIS ISSUE
J Natl Cancer Inst 2009 101: 281. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]





Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.