Skip Navigation



Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access published online on March 11, 2008

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, doi:10.1093/jnci/djn033
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
100/6/399    most recent
djn033v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vernooij, F.
Right arrow Articles by van der Graaf, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vernooij, F.
Right arrow Articles by van der Graaf, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrowEditorial about this Article
Right arrowRelated Article in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Author(s).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


ARTICLES

Specialized Care and Survival of Ovarian Cancer Patients in The Netherlands: Nationwide Cohort Study

Flora Vernooij, A. Peter M. Heintz, Petronella O. Witteveen, Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo, Jan-Willem Coebergh, Yolanda van der Graaf

Affiliations of authors: Departments of Gynecologic Surgery and Oncology (FV, APMH) and Medical Oncology (POW) and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (YvdG), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Middle Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands (MvdHvdL); Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (JWC)

Correspondence to: Flora Vernooij, MD, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands (e-mail: f.vernooij{at}umcutrecht.nl).

Background: There is much debate on the necessity of regionalization of ovarian cancer care. We investigated the association between hospital type and survival of patients with ovarian cancer in The Netherlands.

Methods: A retrospective, population-based cohort study was performed on all Dutch patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2003. We used data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry that were linked to mortality data from the Statistics Netherlands database to obtain the date and cause of death. Five-year relative survival ratios, defined as the ratio of the observed survival in the patient population to the expected survival of women in the general population with the same age, were determined for the total population and for groups stratified by tumor stage and/or hospital type. The association between hospital type and disease-specific survival was analyzed by use of multivariable Cox regression analyses.

Results: We analyzed data from 8621 women with epithelial ovarian cancer, of whom 3482 (40%) were treated in general hospitals, 3510 (41%) were treated in semispecialized hospitals, and 1557 (18%) were treated in specialized hospitals. Five-year relative overall survival ratios of patients treated in general, semispecialized, and specialized hospitals were 38.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 36.0% to 39.9%), 39.4% (95% CI = 37.5% to 41.4%), and 40.3% (95% CI = 37.4% to 43.1%), respectively; median survival of patients aged 50–75 years was 36 months (interquartile range [IQR] = 13 to >54 months), 37 months (IQR = 14 to >54 months), and 38 months (IQR = 15 to >55 months), respectively. Age and cancer stage were associated with the relationship between hospital type and ovarian cancer–specific survival but histologic tumor type, grade, year of diagnosis, and socioeconomic status were not. Among patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, treatment in semispecialized and specialized hospitals was associated with lower risks of ovarian cancer–specific mortality than treatment in general hospitals. Among patients with stage I–IIA disease who were aged 50–75 years, risk of ovarian cancer–specific mortality was 30% and 42% lower after treatment in semispecialized and specialized hospitals, respectively, than in general hospitals (for semispecialized hospitals, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.93; for specialized hospitals, HR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.87). Among patients with advanced ovarian cancer, hospital type was not associated with survival.

Conclusion: Hospital type was statistically significantly associated with survival among Dutch ovarian cancer patients with early-stage ovarian cancer: Patients who were treated in specialized and semispecialized hospitals survived longer than patients treated in general hospitals.



CONTEXT AND CAVEATS

Prior knowledge

Some countries have developed referral guidelines that recommend that ovarian cancer patients be treated in specialized centers because treatment in such hospitals has been shown to result in better survival.

Study design

Retrospective, population-based cohort study performed on all Dutch patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2003, investigating the association between hospital type (general, semispecialized, and specialized) and disease-specific survival.

Contribution

Hospital type was statistically significantly associated with survival among patients with early-stage ovarian cancer in The Netherlands. Ovarian cancer patients with early-stage cancer who were treated in specialized or semispecialized hospitals survived longer than patients treated in general hospitals. Among patients with advanced ovarian cancer, no association was found between hospital type and survival.

Implications

The level of collaboration between general hospitals and semispecialized or specialized hospitals during the study period was not sufficient to deliver optimal care to all Dutch patients with ovarian cancer. Regionalized care thus seems necessary.

Limitations

Adjustment for comorbidity could not be done, so it is possible that more patients without severe comorbid conditions were referred to specialized hospitals than patients with comorbid conditions.

 
Manuscript received July 13, 2007; revised January 3, 2008; accepted January 23, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Editorial about this Article

Enhancing Cancer Registry Data to Promote Rational Health System Design
Deborah Schrag
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 378-379. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Related Article in JNCI

IN THIS ISSUE
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 375. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Does Specialized Care Improve Ovarian Cancer Outcomes?
Journal Watch Women's Health, May 8, 2008; 2008(508): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. Schrag
Enhancing Cancer Registry Data to Promote Rational Health System Design
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 19, 2008; 100(6): 378 - 379.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.