Skip Navigation



Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access published online on February 12, 2008

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, doi:10.1093/jnci/djm291
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/4/277    most recent
djm291v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by South, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by de la Chapelle, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by South, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by de la Chapelle, A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press.

BRIEF COMMUNICATION

The Frequency of Muir-Torre Syndrome Among Lynch Syndrome Families

Christopher D. South, Heather Hampel, Ilene Comeras, Judith A. Westman, Wendy L. Frankel, Albert de la Chapelle

Affiliations of authors: Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (CDS), Department of Pathology (WLF), and the Human Cancer Genetics Program, Comprehensive Cancer Center (HH, IC, JAW, AdlC), The Ohio State University-Columbus, OH

Correspondence to: Albert de la Chapelle, MD, PhD, Human Cancer Genetics Program, 646 Tzagournis Medical Research Facility, 420 West 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 (e-mail: albert.delachapelle{at}osumc.edu).

Lynch syndrome is the predisposition to visceral malignancies that are associated with deleterious germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes, including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Muir-Torre syndrome is a variant of Lynch syndrome that includes a predisposition to certain skin tumors. We determined the frequency of Muir-Torre syndrome among 50 Lynch syndrome families that were ascertained from a population-based series of cancer patients who were newly diagnosed with colorectal or endometrial carcinoma. Histories of Muir-Torre syndrome–associated skin tumors were documented during counseling of family members. Muir-Torre syndrome was observed in 14 (28%) of 50 families and in 14 (9.2%) of 152 individuals with Lynch syndrome. Four (44%) of nine families with MLH1 mutations had a member with Muir-Torre syndrome compared with 10 (42%) of 24 families with MSH2 mutations (P = .302). Families who carried the c.942+3A>T MSH2 gene mutation had a higher frequency of Muir-Torre syndrome than families who carried other mutations in the MSH2 gene (75% vs 25%; P = .026). Muir-Torre syndrome was not found in families with mutations in the MSH6 or PMS2 genes. Our results suggest that Muir-Torre syndrome is simply a variant of Lynch syndrome. Screening for Muir-Torre syndrome–associated skin lesions among patients with Lynch syndrome is recommended.



CONTEXT AND CAVEATS

Prior knowledge

Some individuals with Lynch syndrome—an inherited predisposition to develop colorectal and other specific cancers—also have a tendency to develop certain kinds of skin tumors (ie, Muir-Torre syndrome). Cancerous lesions associated with both syndromes are characterized by inherited deleterious mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, including MSH2.

Study design

A cohort study to examine the frequency of Muir-Torre syndrome–related skin tumors among 50 Lynch syndrome families (confirmed by MMR gene mutation analysis) who were ascertained from a population-based series of patients newly diagnosed with colorectal or endometrial cancer.

Contribution

Muir-Torre syndrome was observed in 28% of the 50 families and in 9.2% of the 152 individuals with Lynch syndrome. The frequency of Muir-Torre syndrome was 75% among families who carried a specific deleterious mutation in the MSH2 gene vs 25% among families who carried other mutations in this gene.

Limitations

There was a preponderance of the Muir-Torre syndrome–associated deleterious MSH2 gene mutation in the study cohort. Histories of skin lesions may have been subject to recall bias.

Implications

Patients with Lynch syndrome should be screened for Muir-Torre syndrome–associated skin lesions.

 

This publication was prepared under a grant from the State of Ohio Biomedical Research and Technology Transfer Commission. The content reflects the views of the Grantee and does not necessarily reflect the views of the State of Ohio Biomedical Research and Technology Transfer Commission. Ms Hampel had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Manuscript received August 15, 2007; revised November 26, 2007; accepted November 28, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Article in JNCI

IN THIS ISSUE
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 227. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
B. H. Thiers, R. E. Sahn, and J. P. Callen
Cutaneous Manifestations of Internal Malignancy
CA Cancer J Clin, March 3, 2009; (2009) caac.20005v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Meyer, A. Brieger, G. Plotz, N. Weber, S. Passmann, T. Dingermann, S. Zeuzem, J. Trojan, and R. Marschalek
An Interstitial Deletion at 3p21.3 Results in the Genetic Fusion of MLH1 and ITGA9 in a Lynch Syndrome Family
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2009; 15(3): 762 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.