Skip Navigation



Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access published online on November 13, 2007

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, doi:10.1093/jnci/djm199
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
99/22/1706    most recent
djm199v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Calster, B.
Right arrow Articles by Valentin, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Calster, B.
Right arrow Articles by Valentin, L.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 The Author(s).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


ARTICLES

Discrimination Between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses by Specialist Ultrasound Examination Versus Serum CA-125

Ben Van Calster, Dirk Timmerman, Tom Bourne, Antonia Carla Testa, Caroline Van Holsbeke, Ekaterini Domali, Davor Jurkovic, Patrick Neven, Sabine Van Huffel, Lil Valentin

Affiliations of authors: Department of Electrical Engineering, ESAT-SISTA, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium (BVC, SVH); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (DT, CVH, ED, PN); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St. George’s Hospital Medical School, University of London, London, U.K. (TB); Istituto di Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (ACT); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King's College Hospital, London, U.K. (DJ); Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden (LV)

Correspondence to: Dirk Timmerman, MD, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium (e-mail: dirk.timmerman{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be).

Background: Subjective evaluation of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings (i.e., pattern recognition) by an experienced examiner and preoperative serum levels of CA-125 can both discriminate benign from malignant adnexal (i.e., ovarian, paraovarian, or tubal) masses. We compared the diagnostic performance of these methods in a large multicenter study.

Methods: In a prospective multicenter study—the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis—1066 women with a persistent adnexal mass underwent transvaginal gray-scale and color Doppler ultrasound examinations by an experienced examiner within 120 days of surgery. Pattern recognition was used to classify a mass as benign or malignant. Of these women, 809 also had blood collected preoperatively for measurement of serum CA-125. Various levels of CA-125 were used as cutoffs to classify masses. Results from both assays were then compared with histologic findings after surgery.

Results: Pattern recognition correctly classified 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 90.9% to 94.6%) of the tumors as benign or malignant. Serum CA-125 correctly classified at best 83% (95% CI = 80.3% to 85.6%) of the masses. Histologic diagnoses that were most often misclassified by CA-125 were fibroma, endometrioma, and abscess (false-positive results) and borderline tumor (false-negative results). Pattern recognition correctly classified 86% (95% CI = 81.1% to 90.4%) of masses of these four histologic types as being benign or malignant, whereas a serum CA-125 at a cutoff of 30 U/mL correctly classified 41% (95% CI = 34.4% to 47.5%) of them. Pattern recognition assigned a correct specific histologic diagnosis to 333 (59%, 95% CI = 54.5% to 62.8%) of the 567 benign lesions.

Conclusion: Pattern recognition was superior to serum CA-125 for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.



CONTEXT AND CAVEATS

Prior knowledge

Subjective evaluation of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings (i.e., pattern recognition) by an experienced examiner and preoperative serum levels of CA-125 can both discriminate benign from malignant adnexal (i.e., ovarian, paraovarian, or tubal) masses.

Study design

Multicenter prospective study of 1066 women with a persistent adnexal mass that compared the abilities of pattern recognition and of CA-125 serum levels to classify masses as benign or malignant and to classify them further by histologic subtype. After its resection, each mass was examined histologically.

Contribution

Pattern recognition by an experienced examiner was superior to serum CA-125 for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses and correctly classified more than half of the masses by subtype.

Implications

Measurement of CA-125 is not as helpful as pattern recognition by an experienced examiner for the correct classification of adnexal masses. Because the accuracy of pattern recognition depends on the level of experience of the examiner, more effort should be expended to educate and train ultrasound examiners.

Limitations

CA-125 serum levels were not available for 24% of patients, most of whom had benign masses by pattern recognition with a high degree of confidence. These results reveal a bias whereby serum CA-125 was more likely to be measured in women with masses that were suspected of being malignant.

 

The funding agencies had no role in the design of the study, the collection of the data, the analysis and interpretation of the data, the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors had full responsibility for all these activities.

Manuscript received May 22, 2007; revised September 4, 2007; accepted September 20, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Articles in JNCI

IN THIS ISSUE
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 1653. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Ultrasound May Better Classify Ovarian Tumors
Liz Savage and Andrea Widener
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 1653. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
V. Gowri and R. Jain
Investigating infertility
BMJ, September 9, 2009; 339(sep09_2): b3390 - b3390.
[Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. P. Bertenshaw, P. Yip, P. Seshaiah, J. Zhao, T.-H. Chen, W. S. Wiggins, J. P. Mapes, and B. C. Mansfield
Multianalyte Profiling of Serum Antigens and Autoimmune and Infectious Disease Molecules to Identify Biomarkers Dysregulated in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2008; 17(10): 2872 - 2881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Timmerman, T. Bourne, F. Amant, C. Van Holsbeke, I. Vergote, A. C. Testa, B. Van Calster, S. Van Huffel, and L. Valentin
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2008; 26(3): 513 - 513.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.