Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on October 9, 2007
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2007 99(20):1534-1543; doi:10.1093/jnci/djm159
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/20/1534    most recent
djm159v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prentice, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chlebowski, R. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prentice, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chlebowski, R. T.
Related Collections
Right arrowCorrespondence about this Article
Right arrowRelated Articles in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLES

Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Cancer Incidence in the Women’s Health Initiative Dietary Modification Randomized Controlled Trial

Ross L. Prentice, Cynthia A. Thomson, Bette Caan, F. Allan Hubbell, Garnet L. Anderson, Shirley A. A. Beresford, Mary Pettinger, Dorothy S. Lane, Lawrence Lessin, Shagufta Yasmeen, Baljinder Singh, Janardan Khandekar, James M. Shikany, Suzanne Satterfield, Rowan T. Chlebowski

Affiliations of authors: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (RLP, GLA, MP); Department of Nutritional Services, University of Arizona, Tucson/Phoenix, AZ (CAT); Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA (BC); Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA (FAH); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (SAAB); Department of Preventive Medicine, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY (DSL); Medstar Research Institute/Howard University, Washington, DC (LL); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA (SY); Department of Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ (BS); Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago/Evanston, IL (JK); Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (JMS); University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN (SS); Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor–UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA (RTC)

Correspondence to: Ross L. Prentice, PhD, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024 (e-mail: rprentic{at}fhcrc.org).

Background: The Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification (DM) Randomized Controlled Trial evaluated the effects of a low-fat dietary pattern on chronic disease incidence, with breast cancer and colorectal cancer as primary outcomes. The trial protocol also listed ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer as outcomes that may be favorably affected by the intervention.

Methods: A total of 48835 postmenopausal women were randomly assigned during 1993–1998 to a DM intervention (n = 19541) or comparison (usual diet; n = 29294) group and followed up for an average of 8.1 years. The intervention goal was to reduce total fat intake to 20% of energy and to increase consumption of vegetables, fruits, and grains. Cancer outcomes were verified by pathology report review. We used weighted log-rank tests to compare incidence of invasive cancers of the ovary and endometrium, total invasive cancer, and invasive cancers at other sites between the groups. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Ovarian cancer risk was lower in the intervention than in the comparison group (P = .03). Although the overall ovarian cancer hazard ratio (HR) was not statistically significantly less than 1.0, the hazard ratio decreased with increasing intervention duration (Ptrend = .01). For the first 4 years, the risk for ovarian cancer was similar in the intervention and control groups (0.52 cases per 1000 person-years in the intervention group versus 0.45 per 1000 person-years in the comparison group; HR = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.73 to 1.84); over the next 4.1 years, the risk was lower in the intervention group (0.38 cases per 1000 person-years in the intervention group versus 0.64 per 1000 person-years in the comparison group; HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.96). Risk of cancer of the endometrium did not differ between the groups (P = .18). The estimated risk of total invasive cancer was slightly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.01; P = .10).

Conclusions: A low-fat dietary pattern may reduce the incidence of ovarian cancer among postmenopausal women.



CONTEXT AND CAVEATS

Prior knowledge

Previously, the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification (DM) trial analyzed whether a low-fat diet would alter the incidence of breast cancer, colorectal cancer, chronic disease, and cardiovascular disease.

Study design

Randomized controlled trial of postmenopausal women who were assigned to their usual diet or to the DM intervention. Risks of invasive ovarian and endometrial cancer as well as total invasive cancer and invasive cancer at other sites for a period of 8.1 years were determined.

Contributions

Risk for invasive ovarian cancer was similar in the two groups in the first 4 years but reduced in the subsequent 4.1 years among women in the intervention group compared with women in the comparison group. No statistically significant differences in risk were observed among the two groups for total invasive cancer or invasive endometrial cancer.

Implications

A low-fat diet may reduce the incidence of ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women.

Limitations

Adjustment for multiple comparisons for the risks for the five types of cancer targeted in the trial may reduce the statistical significance of the findings.

 
Manuscript received April 3, 2007; revised July 25, 2007; accepted August 22, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Correspondence about this Article

Re: Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Cancer Incidence in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Randomized Controlled Trial
S. Stanley Young
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 284. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Related Articles in JNCI

IN THIS ISSUE
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 1497. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Low-Fat Diet Possibly Linked to Lower Risk of Ovarian Cancer
Liz Savage and Andrea Widener
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 1497. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. S. Young
Re: Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Cancer Incidence in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Randomized Controlled Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 20, 2008; 100(4): 284 - 284.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.