© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press.
EDITORIALS |
The If's, And's, or But's Regarding Bisphosphonates for Prostate Cancer
Affiliations of authors: Department of Medicine, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, MN; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN
Correspondence to: Timothy J. Wilt, MD, MPH, Department of Medicine, Minneapolis VA Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, 1 Veterans Dr (111-0), Minneapolis, MN 55417 (e-mail: tim.wilt@med.va.gov).
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In 2007, an estimated 218890 men will be diagnosed with, and 27050 deaths will be attributed to, prostate cancer in the United States (1). Men with prostate cancer are at increased risk for skeletal related complications. Bony metastases can result in pain, disability, and pathologic fractures. Use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for primary or palliative treatment is associated with an increased rate of bone loss and higher risk of nonpathologic fractures (2). ADT use has increased two- to fourfold in the past 10 years, and up to 45% of white men receiving conservative management for early-stage prostate cancer receive ADT (3). An estimated 3000 excess fractures per year have been attributed to the use of ADT in older men (2).
Bisphosphonates, which are primarily used to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis, are increasingly prescribed for men with prostate cancer because randomized trials suggest
Related Articles in JNCI
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 765-776.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 741.