Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(9):599-609; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj158
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Correction (v98,p876)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (63)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansel, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ell, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mansel, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ell, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrowEditorial about this Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLE

Randomized Multicenter Trial of Sentinel Node Biopsy Versus Standard Axillary Treatment in Operable Breast Cancer: The ALMANAC Trial

Robert E. Mansel, Lesley Fallowfield, Mark Kissin, Amit Goyal, Robert G. Newcombe, J. Michael Dixon, Constantinos Yiangou, Kieran Horgan, Nigel Bundred, Ian Monypenny, David England, Mark Sibbering, Tholkifl I. Abdullah, Lester Barr, Utheshtra Chetty, Dudley H. Sinnett, Anne Fleissig, Dayalan Clarke, Peter J. Ell

Affiliations of authors: Department of Surgery, Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K. (REM, AG, IM, DC); Cancer Research UK Psychosocial Oncology Group, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Falmer, U.K. (LF, AF); Department of Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, U.K. (MK); Department of Epidemiology, Statistics and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K. (RGN); Department of Surgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, U.K. (JMD, UC); Department of Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, U.K. (CY); Department of Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, U.K. (KH); Department of Surgery, South Manchester University Hospital, Manchester, U.K. (NB, LB); Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, U.K. (DE); Department of Surgery, Derby City General Hospital, Derby, U.K. (MS); Department of Surgery, Edith Cavell Hospital, Peterborough, U.K. (TIA); Department of Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London, U.K. (DHS); Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Middlesex Hospital, London, U.K. (PJE)

Correspondence to: Robert E. Mansel, FRCS, Department of Surgery, Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United Kingdom (e-mail: ManselRE{at}cf.ac.uk).

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with operable breast cancer is routinely used in some countries for staging the axilla despite limited data from randomized trials on morbidity and mortality outcomes. We conducted a multicenter randomized trial to compare quality-of-life outcomes between patients with clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer who received sentinel lymph node biopsy and patients who received standard axillary treatment. Methods: The primary outcome measures were arm and shoulder morbidity and quality of life. From November 1999 to October 2003, 1031 patients were randomly assigned to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (n = 515) or standard axillary surgery (n = 516). Patients with sentinel lymph node metastases proceeded to delayed axillary clearance or received axillary radiotherapy (depending on the protocol at the treating institution). Intention-to-treat analyses of data at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery are presented. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The relative risks of any lymphedema and sensory loss for the sentinel lymph node biopsy group compared with the standard axillary treatment group at 12 months were 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23 to 0.60; absolute rates: 5% versus 13%) and 0.37 (95% CI = 0.27 to 0.50; absolute rates: 11% versus 31%), respectively. Drain usage, length of hospital stay, and time to resumption of normal day-to-day activities after surgery were statistically significantly lower in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group (all P<.001), and axillary operative time was reduced (P = .055). Overall patient-recorded quality of life and arm functioning scores were statistically significantly better in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group throughout (all P≤.003). These benefits were seen with no increase in anxiety levels in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group (P>.05). Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with reduced arm morbidity and better quality of life than standard axillary treatment and should be the treatment of choice for patients who have early-stage breast cancer with clinically negative nodes.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Editorial about this Article

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: Has Its Time Come?
Joseph Pater and Wendy Parulekar
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006 98: 568-569. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
N. C Turner and A. L Jones
Management of breast cancer--Part I
BMJ, July 4, 2008; 337(jul04_1): a421 - a421.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
S. Samphao, J. M. Eremin, M. El-Sheemy, and O. Eremin
Management of the Axilla in Women With Breast Cancer: Current Clinical Practice and a New Selective Targeted Approach
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2008; 15(5): 1282 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
S. G. ROCKSON and K. K. RIVERA
Estimating the Population Burden of Lymphedema
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., May 1, 2008; 1131(1): 147 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. K. Tan, D. Giri, A. J. Hummer, K. S. Panageas, E. Brogi, L. Norton, C. Hudis, P. I. Borgen, and H. S. Cody III
Occult Axillary Node Metastases in Breast Cancer Are Prognostically Significant: Results in 368 Node-Negative Patients With 20-Year Follow-Up
J. Clin. Oncol., April 10, 2008; 26(11): 1803 - 1809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
I. M. C. van der Ploeg, B. B. R. Kroon, N. Antonini, R. A. V. Olmos, E. J. T. Rutgers, and O. E. Nieweg
Axillary and Extra-axillary Lymph Node Recurrences after a Tumor-Negative Sentinel Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer Using Intralesional Tracer Administration
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 1025 - 1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. G.J. Van der Zee, M. H. Oonk, J. A. De Hullu, A. C. Ansink, I. Vergote, R. H. Verheijen, A. Maggioni, K. N. Gaarenstroom, P. J. Baldwin, E. B. Van Dorst, et al.
Sentinel Node Dissection Is Safe in the Treatment of Early-Stage Vulvar Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2008; 26(6): 884 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. J.T. Rutgers
Sentinel Node Biopsy: Interpretation and Management of Patients With Immunohistochemistry-Positive Sentinel Nodes and Those With Micrometastases
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 698 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
S. K. Somasundaram, D. W. Chicken, and M. R. S. Keshtgar
Detection of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer
Br. Med. Bull., January 3, 2008; (2008) ldm032v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
A. Goyal, R. G. Newcombe, A. Chhabra, and R. E. Mansel
Morbidity in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Node Metastases Undergoing Delayed Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) Compared with Immediate ALND
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 262 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. Ponzone, P. Mininanni, E. Cassina, and P. Sismondi
Axillary Reverse Mapping in Breast Cancer: Can we Spare what we Find?
Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 390 - 391.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
radtechHome page
J. MINIGH
Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping of the Breast
Radiol. Technol., January 1, 2008; 79(3): 243M - 257M.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Modi, A. W. B. Stanton, W. E. Svensson, A. M. Peters, P. S. Mortimer, and J. R. Levick
Human lymphatic pumping measured in healthy and lymphoedematous arms by lymphatic congestion lymphoscintigraphy
J. Physiol., August 15, 2007; 583(1): 271 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. Thompson, S. Korourian, R. Henry-Tillman, L. Adkins, S. Mumford, K. C. Westbrook, and V S. Klimberg
Axillary Reverse Mapping (ARM): A New Concept to Identify and Enhance Lymphatic Preservation
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 14(6): 1890 - 1895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
Y A Masannat, A M Shaaban, V Speirs, G Coast, P Jackson, K Horgan, and A M Hanby
Adverse effects of dyes used in sentinel node biopsy on immunocytochemical determination of hormone receptors in breast cancer cells
J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2007; 60(6): 730 - 732.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. Sharma, W. Wang, J. C. Rasmussen, A. Joshi, J. P. Houston, K. E. Adams, A. Cameron, S. Ke, S. Kwon, M. E. Mawad, et al.
Quantitative imaging of lymph function
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H3109 - H3118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
I Blancas, J. Garcia-Puche, B Bermejo, E. Hanrahan, C Monteagudo, A Martinez-Agullo, R Rouzier, B. Hennessy, V Valero, and A Lluch
Low number of examined lymph nodes in node-negative breast cancer patients is an adverse prognostic factor
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 1644 - 1649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Sentinel-Node Biopsy vs. Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer
Journal Watch (General), May 23, 2006; 2006(523): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. Pater and W. Parulekar
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer: has its time come?
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 3, 2006; 98(9): 568 - 569.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.