Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(9):580-598; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj162
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Workman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zweit, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Workman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zweit, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.

REVIEW

Minimally Invasive Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Technologies in Hypothesis-Testing Clinical Trials of Innovative Therapies

Paul Workman, Eric O. Aboagye, Yuen-Li Chung, John R. Griffiths, Rachel Hart, Martin O. Leach, Ross J. Maxwell, Paul M. J. McSheehy, Pat M. Price, Jamal Zweit
For the Cancer Research UK Pharmacodynamic/Pharmacokinetic Technologies Advisory Committee

Affiliations of authors: Cancer Research UK Centre for Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, U.K. (PW); Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, U.K. (EOA); Cancer Research UK Biomedical Magnetic Resonance Research Group, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, U.K. (YLC, JRG); Cancer Research UK Drug Development Office, London, U.K. (RH); Cancer Research UK Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research Group, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, U.K. (MOL); Gray Cancer Institute, Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, U.K. (RJM); Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland (PMJM); Cancer Research UK PET Oncology Group, Molecular Imaging Centre, Manchester, U.K. (PMP); Cancer Research UK/University of Manchester Radiochemical Targeting & Imaging Group, Paterson Institute of Cancer Research, Manchester, U.K. (JZ)

Correspondence to: Paul Workman, PhD, Cancer Research UK Centre for Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, Haddow Laboratories, 15 Cotswold Road, Belmont, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, United Kingdom (e-mail: paul.workman{at}icr.ac.uk).

Clinical trials of new cancer drugs should ideally include measurements of parameters such as molecular target expression, pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior, and pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints that can be linked to measures of clinical effect. Appropriate PK/PD biomarkers facilitate proof-of-concept demonstrations for target modulation; enhance the rational selection of an optimal drug dose and schedule; aid decision-making, such as whether to continue or close a drug development project; and may explain or predict clinical outcomes. In addition, measurement of PK/PD biomarkers can minimize uncertainty associated with predicting drug safety and efficacy, reduce the high levels of drug attrition during development, accelerate drug approval, and decrease the overall costs of drug development. However, there are many challenges in the development and implementation of biomarkers that probably explain their disappointingly low implementation in phase I trials. The Pharmacodynamic/Pharmacokinetic Technologies Advisory committee of Cancer Research UK has found that submissions for phase I trials of new cancer drugs in the United Kingdom often lack detailed information about PK and/or PD endpoints, which leads to suboptimal information being obtained in those trials or to delays in starting the trials while PK/PD methods are developed and validated. Minimally invasive PK/PD technologies have logistic and ethical advantages over more invasive technologies. Here we review these technologies, emphasizing magnetic resonance spectroscopy and positron emission tomography, which provide detailed functional and metabolic information. Assays that measure effects of drugs on important biologic pathways and processes are likely to be more cost-effective than those that measure specific molecular targets. Development, validation, and implementation of minimally invasive PK/PD methods are encouraged.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. H. Doroshow and R. E. Parchment
Oncologic Phase 0 Trials Incorporating Clinical Pharmacodynamics: from Concept to Patient
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3658 - 3663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
R. Kinders, R. E. Parchment, J. Ji, S. Kummar, A. J. Murgo, M. Gutierrez, J. Collins, L. Rubinstein, O. Pickeral, S. M. Steinberg, et al.
Phase 0 Clinical Trials in Cancer Drug Development: From FDA Guidance to Clinical Practice
Mol. Interv., December 1, 2007; 7(6): 325 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
F. Chan, C. Sun, M. Perumal, Q.-D. Nguyen, V. Bavetsias, E. McDonald, V. Martins, N. E. Wilsher, F. I. Raynaud, M. Valenti, et al.
Mechanism of action of the Aurora kinase inhibitor CCT129202 and in vivo quantification of biological activity
Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2007; 6(12): 3147 - 3157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. P.B. O'Connor, G. C. Jayson, A. Jackson, D. Ghiorghiu, B. M. Carrington, C. J. Rose, S. J. Mills, R. Swindell, C. Roberts, C. L. Mitchell, et al.
Enhancing Fraction Predicts Clinical Outcome following First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 13(20): 6130 - 6135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. L. Ehman, W. R. Hendee, M. J. Welch, N. R. Dunnick, L. B. Bresolin, R. L. Arenson, S. Baum, H. Hricak, and J. H. Thrall
Blueprint for Imaging in Biomedical Research
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 12 - 27.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. J. LeRoy, J. J. Hunter, K. M. Hoar, K. E. Burke, V. Shinde, J. Ruan, D. Bowman, K. Galvin, and J. A. Ecsedy
Localization of Human TACC3 to Mitotic Spindles Is Mediated by Phosphorylation on Ser558 by Aurora A: A Novel Pharmacodynamic Method for Measuring Aurora A Activity
Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 67(11): 5362 - 5370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Cao, T. Subhawong, J. M. Albert, K. W. Kim, L. Geng, K. R. Sekhar, Y. J. Gi, and B. Lu
Inhibition of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin or Apoptotic Pathway Induces Autophagy and Radiosensitizes PTEN Null Prostate Cancer Cells.
Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 66(20): 10040 - 10047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Perumal, R. G. Pillai, H. Barthel, J. Leyton, J. R. Latigo, M. Forster, F. Mitchell, A. L. Jackman, and E. O. Aboagye
Redistribution of Nucleoside Transporters to the Cell Membrane Provides a Novel Approach for Imaging Thymidylate Synthase Inhibition by Positron Emission Tomography.
Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8558 - 8564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Leyton, J. P. Alao, M. Da Costa, A. V. Stavropoulou, J. R. Latigo, M. Perumal, R. Pillai, Q. He, P. Atadja, E. W.-F. Lam, et al.
In vivo Biological Activity of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor LAQ824 Is detectable with 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]Fluorothymidine Positron Emission Tomography.
Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 66(15): 7621 - 7629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.