Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(23):1671; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj507
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Japanese Translation
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2006.

IN THIS ISSUE

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Independent Evaluation of the Gail Model

The Gail model, which predicts the absolute risk of invasive breast cancer, has been used to counsel at-risk women and design intervention studies. This model has been validated in U.S. populations, but its performance in other populations is uncertain because of variations in breast cancer rates. Decarli et al. (p. 1686) used Italian data from a case–control study and cancer registries to develop a new risk prediction model that uses the same risk factors as the Gail model. They tested the predictive accuracy of the two models using independent data. Both . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Cellular Telephone Use and the Risk of Cancer

BRCA1, BRCA2 Frequency and Cancer Penetrance

Predicting Drug Exposure for a Class of Anticancer Drugs

The ABCG2 Polymorphism and Gefitinib Toxicities

p27Kip1, Cyclin E Expression, and Breast Cancer Survival

Smoking, CIMP, and BRAF Mutations in Colon Cancer

Cognitive Function and Breast Cancer Chemotherapy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?