Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(15):1036-1045; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj296
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrow patientINFORMation
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfisterer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pujade-Lauraine, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pfisterer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pujade-Lauraine, E.
Related Collections
Right arrowEditorial about this Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLE

Randomized Phase III Trial of Topotecan Following Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in First-line Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Trial of the AGO-OVAR and GINECO

Jacobus Pfisterer, Béatrice Weber, Alexander Reuss, Rainer Kimmig, Andreas du Bois, Uwe Wagner, Hugues Bourgeois, Werner Meier, Serban Costa, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Alain Lortholary, Sigrid Olbricht, Anne Stähle, Christian Jackisch, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, Volker Möbus, Jens Quaas, Barbara Richter, Willibald Schröder, Jean-François Geay, Hans-Joachim Lück, Walther Kuhn, Harald Meden, Ulrike Nitz, Eric Pujade-Lauraine
For the AGO-OVAR and GINECO

Affiliations of authors: Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Germany (JP); Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Médecine, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France (BW); Koordinierungszentrum für Klinische Studien, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany (AR); Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Universität München-Großhadern, Germany (RK); Klinik für Gynäkologie und gynäkologische Onkologie, HSK Dr. Horst Schmidt Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany (AdB); Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Germany (UW); Hôpital de la Miletrie, Poitiers, France (HB); Frauenklinik, Ev. Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany (WM); Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der J.W. Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/M., Germany (SC); Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité Universitätsklinikum Berlin, Germany (JUB); Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France (AL); Frauenklinik, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Germany (SO); Frauenklinik, St. Vincentius Kliniken, Karlsruhe, Germany (AS); Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Germany (CJ); Clinique Armoricaine de Radiologie, Saint Brieuc, France (ACHB); Abteilung Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Germany (VM); Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Greifswald, Germany (JQ); Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany (BR); Frauenklinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Germany (WS); Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France (JFG); Zentrum für Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany (HJL); Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Germany (WK); Abteilung Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Göttingen, Germany (HM); Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany (UN); Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France (EPL)

Correspondence to: Jacobus Pfisterer, MD, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Michaelisstr. 16, D-24105 Kiel, Germany (e-mail: jpfisterer{at}email.uni-kiel.de).

Background: The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is the standard of care for the treatment of ovarian cancer, yet rates of recurrence and death remain high. We performed a prospective randomized phase III study to examine whether sequential administration of topotecan can improve the efficacy of carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: A total of 1308 patients with previously untreated ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIB–IV) were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by either four cycles of topotecan (TC-Top; 658 patients) or surveillance (TC; 650 patients) on a 3-week per cycle schedule. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, response rate, toxicity, and quality of life. Time-to-event data were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and a stratified log-rank test was used to compare distributions between treatment groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Categorical data were compared using a stratified Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Median progression-free survival was 18.2 months in the TC-Top arm versus 18.5 months in the TC arm (stratum-adjusted HR = 0.97 [95% CI = 0.85 to 1.10]; P = .688). Median overall survival was 43.1 months for the TC-Top arm versus 44.5 months for the TC arm (stratum-adjusted HR = 1.01 [95% CI = 0.86 to 1.18]; P = .885). At 3 years, overall survival in both arms was 57% (58.5% in the TC arm and 55.7% in the TC-Top arm). Compared with patients in the TC arm, patients in the TC-Top arm had more grade 3–4 hematologic toxic effects (requiring more supportive care) and more grade 3–4 infections (5.1% versus 2.7%; P = .034) but did not have a statistically significant increase in febrile neutropenia (3.3% versus 3.1%; P = .80). Among patients who had measurable disease (TC, n = 147; TC-Top, n = 145), overall (i.e., complete or partial) response was 69.0% (95% CI = 61.4% to 76.5%) in the TC-Top arm and 76.2% (95% CI = 69.3% to 83.1%) in the TC arm (P = .166). Conclusions: The sequential addition of topotecan to carboplatin–paclitaxel did not result in superior overall response or progression-free or overall survival. Therefore, this regimen is not recommended as standard of care treatment for ovarian cancer.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Find additional patient-related information at:

Third Chemo Drug No Help for Ovarian Cancer

Editorial about this Article

Is It Time for Some New Approaches for Treating Advanced Ovarian Cancer?
William P. McGuire
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006 98: 1024-1026. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Pecorelli, G. Favalli, A. Gadducci, D. Katsaros, P. B. Panici, A. Carpi, G. Scambia, M. Ballardini, O. Nanni, and P. Conte
Phase III Trial of Observation Versus Six Courses of Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Complete Response After Six Courses of Paclitaxel/Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: Final Results of the After-6 Protocol 1
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2009; 27(28): 4642 - 4648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
In VivoHome page
G. FIORENTINI, M. FILIPPESCHI, G. TURRISI, A. MAMBRINI, P. G. GIANNESSI, M. D'ALESSANDRO, S. ROSSI, P. DENTICO, S. GUADAGNI, M. CANTORE, et al.
Advanced Cancer of the Ovary: Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy as a New Therapeutical Option
In Vivo, March 1, 2009; 23(2): 317 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Fotopoulou, A. duBois, A. N. Karavas, R. Trappe, B. Aminossadati, B. Schmalfeldt, J. Pfisterer, and J. Sehouli
Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Ovarian Cancer Undergoing Platinum/Paclitaxel-Containing First-Line Chemotherapy: An Exploratory Analysis by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 26(16): 2683 - 2689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
B. Vahid and P. E. Marik
Pulmonary Complications of Novel Antineoplastic Agents for Solid Tumors*
Chest, February 1, 2008; 133(2): 528 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. Mobus, H. Wandt, N. Frickhofen, C. Bengala, K. Champion, R. Kimmig, H. Ostermann, A. Hinke, and J. A. Ledermann
Phase III Trial of High-Dose Sequential Chemotherapy With Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Support Compared With Standard Dose Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Intergroup Trial of the AGO-Ovar/AIO and EBMT
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2007; 25(27): 4187 - 4193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. P. McGuire
Is it time for some new approaches for treating advanced ovarian cancer?
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 2, 2006; 98(15): 1024 - 1026.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.