Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(10):681-690; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj186
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Haffty, B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Haffty, B. G.
Related Collections
Right arrowEditorial about this Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLE

Effectiveness of Radiation Therapy for Older Women With Early Breast Cancer

Benjamin D. Smith, Cary P. Gross, Grace L. Smith, Deron H. Galusha, Justin E. Bekelman, Bruce G. Haffty

Affiliations of authors: Departments of Therapeutic Radiology (BDS, BGH) and Internal Medicine (CPG, GLS, DHG), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (JEB), New York, NY; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Medicine and Dentistry New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ (BGH)

Correspondence to: Benjamin D. Smith, MD, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520–8040 (e-mail: bensmith{at}alumni.rice.edu).

Background: Recent clinical trials have questioned the necessity of breast radiation therapy for older women with early breast cancer. However, the effectiveness of radiation therapy for older women in the community setting has not been addressed. Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare database from January 1, 1992, through December 31, 1999, to identify 8724 women aged 70 years or older treated with conservative surgery for small, lymph node–negative, estrogen receptor–positive (or unknown receptor status) breast cancer. We used a proportional hazards model to test whether radiation therapy was associated with a lower risk of a combined outcome, defined as a second ipsilateral breast cancer reported by SEER and/or a subsequent mastectomy reported by Medicare claims. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Radiation therapy, compared with no radiation therapy, was associated with a lower risk of the combined outcome (hazard ratio = 0.19, 95% confidence interval = 0.14 to 0.28). Radiation therapy was associated with an absolute risk reduction of 4.0 events per 100 women at 5 years (i.e., from 5.1 events without radiation therapy to 1.1 with radiation therapy) and 5.7 events per 100 persons at 8 years (i.e., from 8.0 events without radiation therapy to 2.3 with radiation therapy) (P<.001, log-rank test). Radiation therapy was most likely to benefit those aged 70–79 years without comorbidity (number needed to treat [NNT] to prevent one event = 21 to 22 patients) and was least likely to benefit those aged 80 years or older with moderate to severe comorbidity (NNT = 61 to 125 patients). Conclusion: For older women with early breast cancer, radiation therapy was associated with a lower risk of a second ipsilateral breast cancer and subsequent mastectomy. Patients aged 70–79 years with minimal comorbidity were the most likely to benefit, and older patients with substantial comorbidity were least likely to benefit.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Editorial about this Article

Caring for Older Women With Breast Cancer: Can Observational Research Fill the Clinical Trial Gap?
Bruce E. Hillner and Jeanne Mandelblatt
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006 98: 660-661. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Casalini, M. L. Carcangiu, R. Tammi, P. Auvinen, V.-M. Kosma, P. Valagussa, M. Greco, A. Balsari, S. Menard, and E. Tagliabue
Two Distinct Local Relapse Subtypes in Invasive Breast Cancer: Effect on their Prognostic Impact
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 25 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Terret, G. B. Zulian, A. Naiem, and G. Albrand
Multidisciplinary Approach to the Geriatric Oncology Patient
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2007; 25(14): 1876 - 1881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Crivellari, M. Aapro, R. Leonard, G. von Minckwitz, E. Brain, A. Goldhirsch, A. Veronesi, and H. Muss
Breast Cancer in the Elderly
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2007; 25(14): 1882 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Mandelblatt
Treating Breast Cancer: The Age Old Dilemma of Old Age
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2006; 24(27): 4369 - 4370.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. E. Hillner and J. Mandelblatt
Caring for older women with breast cancer: can observational research fill the clinical trial gap?
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 17, 2006; 98(10): 660 - 661.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.