© 2005 Oxford University Press
COMMENTARY |
Importance of Communication Between Producers and Consumers of Publicly Available Experimental Data
Affiliations of authors: FDA-NCI Clinical Proteomics Program, Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, CCR, Bethesda, MD (LAL, AM, ML); National Cancer Institute Biomedical Proteomics Program, Laboratory of Proteomics and Analytical Technologies, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD (TPC, TDV); National Ovarian Cancer Early Detection Program, New York University, New York, NY (DAF); FDA-NCI Clinical Proteomics Program, Office of Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy, CBER, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD (EFP)
Correspondence to: Emanuel F. Petricoin III, PhD, FDA-NCI Clinical Proteomics Program, Office of Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy, CBER, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD 20892 (e-mail: petricoin{at}cber.fda.gov).
The application of mass spectrometry to discover new cancer biomarkers is in its infancy. Many of these new markers are low-abundance proteins that exist as fragments associated with carrier proteins. Although reproducibility is key to the use of mass spectrometry for ion fingerprint analysis, the scientific community has yet to establish a common platform or standardized operating procedures that are necessary for intra- and inter-laboratory comparison. In an effort to assist others who are perfecting mass spectrometry platforms for profiling, ongoing experimental data were posted for public consumption. An unintended consequence of unrestricted access to experimental data is the risk of inappropriate conclusions drawn and publicly disseminated that could have been avoided by communication between the producers and consumers of the data. Such disputes, however, should not divert us from the validation of this promising new approach.
Related Article in JNCI
- Lessons from Controversy: Ovarian Cancer Screening and Serum Proteomics
- David F. Ransohoff
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 315-319.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. F. Lopez, A. Mikulskis, S. Kuzdzal, E. Golenko, E. F. Petricoin III, L. A. Liotta, W. F. Patton, G. R. Whiteley, K. Rosenblatt, P. Gurnani, et al. A Novel, High-Throughput Workflow for Discovery and Identification of Serum Carrier Protein-Bound Peptide Biomarker Candidates in Ovarian Cancer Samples Clin. Chem., June 1, 2007; 53(6): 1067 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Marguiles, V. S. Klimberg, S. Bhattacharrya, D. Gaddy, and L. J. Suva Genomics and Proteomics of Bone Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 12(20): 6217s - 6221s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Diamandis Serum Proteomic Profiling by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Cancer Diagnosis: Next Steps Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5540 - 5541. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Karsan, B. J. Eigl, S. Flibotte, K. Gelmon, P. Switzer, P. Hassell, D. Harrison, J. Law, M. Hayes, M. Stillwell, et al. Analytical and Preanalytical Biases in Serum Proteomic Pattern Analysis for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1525 - 1528. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Goggins Molecular Markers of Early Pancreatic Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2005; 23(20): 4524 - 4531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



