Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005 97(14):1019; doi:10.1093/jnci/dji256
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayasaka, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hayasaka, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press

MEMO TO THE MEDIA

Press Release

Biased Reporting Found in Cancer Prognostic Studies

Elana Hayasaka

jncimedia@oupjournals.org
301-841-1287
Journal of the National Cancer Institute

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Selective reporting biases may taint many published studies of so-called prognostic factors—biologic or genetic markers that may predict how a patient may fare during or after treatment, according to a new study in the July 20 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

In recent years, researchers have raced to discover and publish papers on . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?