Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(6):443-448; doi:10.1093/jnci/djh069
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (106)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Tuttle, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Tuttle, T. M.
Related Collections
Right arrowCorrespondence about this Article
Right arrowEditorial about this Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

ARTICLE

Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Nancy N. Baxter, Beth A. Virnig, Sara B. Durham, Todd M. Tuttle

Affiliation of authors: Division of Surgical Oncology and School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

Correspondence to: Nancy Baxter, MD, PhD, MMC 450, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (e-mail: baxte025{at}umn.edu)

Background: An increase in incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been documented, and concerns regarding overly aggressive treatment have been raised. This study was designed to evaluate the use of surgery and radiation therapy in treating DCIS. Methods: We used the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to assess treatment of patients with DCIS with no evidence of microinvasion who were diagnosed from January 1, 1992, through December 31, 1999. We assessed the rates of mastectomy, breast reconstruction, radiation therapy after lumpectomy, and axillary dissection. Associations were analyzed by logistic regression. Results: During the study period, 25 206 patients met selection criteria. The incidence of DCIS dramatically increased with time; however, the incidence of comedo lesions did not change. The rate of mastectomy decreased from 43% in 1992 to 28% in 1999, after controlling for age, race, tumor size, comedo histology, and geographic location. However, because of the increase in the diagnosis of DCIS, the age-adjusted incidence of mastectomy for DCIS in the population did not change (7.8 per 100 000 women in 1992 and 1999). Almost half the patients undergoing lumpectomy did not undergo radiation therapy (55% in 1992 and 46% in 1999); in those with comedo histology, 33% did not undergo radiation therapy after lumpectomy, even in 1999. Overall, patients were less likely to have axillary dissection over time (34% in 1992 versus 15% in 1999), yet the rate of axillary dissection was still high (30%) in patients undergoing mastectomy in 1999. Large, statistically and clinically significant variation by geographic location was found in treatment. Conclusions: Treatment of DCIS changed in a clinically significant fashion between 1992 and 1999. Throughout this study, many patients were found to undergo aggressive surgical therapy, including mastectomy and axillary dissection, whereas others appeared to be undertreated, e.g., not receiving radiation therapy after lumpectomy, even in the presence of adverse histologic features. Variation in demographic and geographic factors indicates that at least some of these treatment differences reflect individual and institutional practice patterns that may be modifiable.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Correspondence about this Article

Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Heather Taffet Gold and Andrew W. Dick
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 887-888. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Mattia Intra, Nicole Rotmensz, Giuseppe Viale, and Umberto Veronesi
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 1110-1111. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Peter C. Gøtzsche
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 1257. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Helen Zorbas, Karen Luxford, Alison Evans, and Elmer V. Villanueva
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 1258. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Gordon F. Schwartz, Michael D. Lagios, and Melvin J. Silverstein
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 1258-1259. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

RESPONSE: Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Nancy N. Baxter
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 1259-1260. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Editorial about this Article

The Certainties and the Uncertainties of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Monica Morrow
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 424-425. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
L. L. Hughes, M. Wang, D. L. Page, R. Gray, L. J. Solin, N. E. Davidson, M. A. Lowen, J. N. Ingle, A. Recht, and W. C. Wood
Local Excision Alone Without Irradiation for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2009; 27(32): 5319 - 5324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Nekhlyudov, L. A. Habel, N. S. Achacoso, I. Jung, R. Haque, L. C. Collins, S. J. Schnitt, C. P. Quesenberry Jr, and S. W. Fletcher
Adherence to Long-Term Surveillance Mammography Among Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated With Breast-Conserving Surgery
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2009; 27(19): 3211 - 3216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. R. Eheman, K. M. Shaw, A. B. Ryerson, J. W. Miller, U. A. Ajani, and M. C. White
The Changing Incidence of In situ and Invasive Ductal and Lobular Breast Carcinomas: United States, 1999-2004
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2009; 18(6): 1763 - 1769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. M. Tuttle, S. Jarosek, E. B. Habermann, A. Arrington, A. Abraham, T. J. Morris, and B. A. Virnig
Increasing Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Among Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2009; 27(9): 1362 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. V. Iakovlev, N. C.R. Arneson, V. Wong, C. Wang, S. Leung, G. Iakovleva, K. Warren, M. Pintilie, and S. J. Done
Genomic Differences Between Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast and that Associated with Invasive Disease: a Calibrated aCGH Study
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 14(14): 4446 - 4454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. Rakovitch, J.-P. Pignol, W. Hanna, S. Narod, J. Spayne, S. Nofech-Mozes, C. Chartier, and L. Paszat
Significance of Multifocality in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Outcomes of Women Treated With Breast-Conserving Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., December 10, 2007; 25(35): 5591 - 5596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. C. Boughey, R. J. Gonzalez, E. Bonner, and H. M. Kuerer
Current Treatment and Clinical Trial Developments for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Oncologist, November 1, 2007; 12(11): 1276 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
S. J. Katz and S. T. Hawley
From Policy To Patients And Back: Surgical Treatment Decision Making For Patients With Breast Cancer
Health Aff., May 1, 2007; 26(3): 761 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. Qaseem, V. Snow, K. Sherif, M. Aronson, K. B. Weiss, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee
Screening Mammography for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians
Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 511 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. Armstrong, E. Moye, S. Williams, J. A. Berlin, and E. E. Reynolds
Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians
Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 516 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
S. Latosinsky, K. Fradette, L. Lix, K. Hildebrand, and D. Turner
Canadian breast cancer guidelines: Have they made a difference?
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 13, 2007; 176(6): 771 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. Govindarajan, N. G. Coburn, A. Kiss, L. Rabeneck, A. J. Smith, and C. H. L. Law
Population-based assessment of the surgical management of locally advanced colorectal cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 18, 2006; 98(20): 1474 - 1481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
H. I.J. Wildschut, T.J. Peters, and C. P. Weiner
Screening in women's health, with emphasis on fetal Down's syndrome, breast cancer and osteoporosis
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 499 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. S. Punglia, J. C. Weeks, B. A. Neville, and C. C. Earle
Radiation Therapy After Mastectomy Between 1991 and 1999 in Elderly Women: Response to Clinical Trial Information
J. Clin. Oncol., July 20, 2006; 24(21): 3474 - 3482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Nekhlyudov, C. H. Kroenke, I. Jung, M. D. Holmes, and G. A. Colditz
Prospective Changes in Quality of Life After Ductal Carcinoma-in-Situ: Results From the Nurses' Health Study
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2822 - 2827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. A. Buchholz, R. L. Theriault, J. C. Niland, M. E. Hughes, R. Ottesen, S. B. Edge, M. A. Bookman, and J. C. Weeks
The Use of Radiation As a Component of Breast Conservation Therapy in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Centers
J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2006; 24(3): 361 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
G. Arpino, R. Laucirica, and R. M. Elledge
Premalignant and In Situ Breast Disease: Biology and Clinical Implications
Ann Intern Med, September 20, 2005; 143(6): 446 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. J. Katz, P. M. Lantz, N. K. Janz, A. Fagerlin, K. Schwartz, L. Liu, D. Deapen, B. Salem, I. Lakhani, and M. Morrow
Patient Involvement in Surgery Treatment Decisions for Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5526 - 5533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. J. Katz, P. M. Lantz, N. K. Janz, A. Fagerlin, K. Schwartz, L. Liu, D. Deapen, B. Salem, I. Lakhani, and M. Morrow
Patterns and Correlates of Local Therapy for Women With Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2005; 23(13): 3001 - 3007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. I. Li, J. R. Daling, and K. E. Malone
Age-Specific Incidence Rates of In situ Breast Carcinomas by Histologic Type, 1980 to 2001
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2005; 14(4): 1008 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
D D Gladman and A Menter
Introduction/overview on clinical registries
Ann Rheum Dis, March 1, 2005; 64(suppl_2): ii101 - ii102.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
D D Gladman, C Ritchlin, and P S Helliwell
Psoriatic arthritis clinical registries and genomics
Ann Rheum Dis, March 1, 2005; 64(suppl_2): ii103 - ii105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
P. C. Gotzsche
Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 18, 2004; 96(16): 1257 - 1257.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
H. Zorbas, K. Luxford, A. Evans, and E. V. Villanueva
Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 18, 2004; 96(16): 1258 - 1258.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. F. Schwartz, M. D. Lagios, and M. J. Silverstein
Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 18, 2004; 96(16): 1258 - 1259.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Intra, N. Rotmensz, G. Viale, and U. Veronesi
Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 21, 2004; 96(14): 1110 - 1111.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. D. Leonard and S. M. Swain
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Complexities and Challenges
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 16, 2004; 96(12): 906 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
H. T. Gold and A. W. Dick
Re: Trends in the Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 2, 2004; 96(11): 887 - 888.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. H. Tanne
US study shows wide variation in approach to ductal carcinoma in situ
BMJ, April 3, 2004; 328(7443): 785 - 785.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Morrow
The Certainties and the Uncertainties of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 17, 2004; 96(6): 424 - 425.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.