© 2004 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004 Oxford University Press
CORRESPONDENCE |
RESPONSE: Re: Changes in Breast Cancer Detection and Mammography Recall Rates After the Introduction of a Computer-Aided Detection System
Affiliations of authors: Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, and Magee-Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (DG, JHS); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (HER)
Correspondence to: David Gur, ScD, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Radiology, Imaging Research, Ste. 4200 Magee-Womens Hospital, 300 Halket St., Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3180 (e-mail: gurd@upmc.edu)
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
We thank Feig et al. for their three comments. First, we clearly stated in our article (page 188) that because of the large 95% confidence intervals, "our findings are consistent with the range of improvement in detection rates estimated and reported by others" (1
Related Correspondence
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 1260-1261.