Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2003 95(13):926-927; doi:10.1093/jnci/95.13.926
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaye, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Komiya, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaye, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Komiya, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 95, No. 13, 926-927, July 2, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press


EDITORIAL

New Leads Suggest a Clinically Relevant Genotype–Phenotype Relationship for the p53 Gene

Frederic J. Kaye, Takefumi Komiya

Affiliation of authors: Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute and the National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD.

Correspondence to: Frederic J. Kaye, M.D., Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute and the National Naval Medical Center, Bldg. 8, Rm. 5101, Bethesda, MD 20889 (e-mail: kayef@navmed.nci.nih.gov).

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The literature dedicated to the functional properties of the p53 gene can make one wish that there were more genes in the human genome and far fewer functions for each protein product. p53, arguably the most heavily studied gene product, can interact with a wide array of nuclear and cytoplasmic binding partners. These interactions, as well as subtle posttranslational changes in phosphorylation, acetylation, sumoylation, and other modifications, can modulate the central activity of p53—the transcriptional activation (and occasional repression) of downstream target genes. Although there is increasing evidence for unexpected nontranscriptional roles for p53 (1), the regulation of target gene expression in concert with individual components of parallel and interconnecting cell signaling cascade pathways mediates the primary function of p53, which has been reviewed extensively (2). This function can be summarized as the ability to sense and respond to cellular stresses that can range from dramatic . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?