© 2003 by Oxford University Press
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 95, No. 12, 889-896,
June 18, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press
ARTICLE |
Weak Yet Distinct Mutagenicity of Acrylamide in Mammalian Cells
Affiliation of authors: A. Besaratinia, G. P. Pfeifer, Division of Biology, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Correspondence to: Ahmad Besaratinia, Ph.D., Division of Biology, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope National Medical Center, 1450 East Duarte Rd., Duarte, CA 91010 (e-mail: ania{at}coh.org).
Background: Despite concern raised with the announcement that common heating processes such as frying introduce acrylamide, a known rodent carcinogen, into food, the mutagenicity of acrylamide in mammalian DNA is controversial. Methods: Big Blue mouse embryonic fibroblasts, which carry a 
phage cII transgene, were treated with acrylamide. Formation of DNA adducts was determined by terminal transferase-dependent polymerase chain reaction. Mutational events were detected with a phage-based mutagenesis assay and expressed as the frequency of the number of mutant cII plaques per total number of plaques screened. Mutations were confirmed by DNA sequence analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: In vitro treatment of the cells with acrylamide at millimolar concentrations induced DNA adducts along the cII gene. Treatment with acrylamide at micromolar concentrations increased the frequency of mutations in the cII gene up to twofold relative to control treatment (13.8 x 10-5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.3 to 15.3 x 10-5 versus 6.9 x 10-5, 95% CI = 6.5 to 7.3 x 10-5, df = 2, 21; P<.001; ANOVA). The specificity of acrylamide in inducing cII gene mutations was shown by a statistically significantly different mutational spectrum from that in control-treated cells, with an excess of G 
C transversions and A G transitions (P = .024; Adams and Skopek test). Although some of the frequently mutated sites in the cII gene co-localized with sites of preferential DNA adduct formation, there was no direct relationship. Conclusion: Acrylamide had distinct mutagenicity in transgenic mouse embryonic fibroblast cells, which might potentially be ascribed to its DNA adduct-inducing property. Whether acrylamide has the same effects on human cells is yet to be determined.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Besaratinia and G. P. Pfeifer A review of mechanisms of acrylamide carcinogenicity Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 519 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Felton and M. G. Knize A meat and potato war: implications for cancer etiology Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2006; 27(12): 2367 - 2370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Besaratinia and G. P. Pfeifer Genotoxicity of Acrylamide and Glycidamide J Natl Cancer Inst, July 7, 2004; 96(13): 1023 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Granath and M. Tornqvist Who Knows Whether Acrylamide in Food Is Hazardous to Humans? J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2003; 95(12): 842 - 843. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|