Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2003 95(10):758-759; doi:10.1093/jnci/95.10.758-a
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopans, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopans, D. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 95, No. 10, 758-759, May 21, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

Re: Association of Volume and Volume-Independent Factors With Accuracy in Screening Mammogram Interpretation

Daniel B. Kopans

Correspondence to: Daniel B. Kopans, M.D., F.A.C.R., Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Wang Ambulatory Care Center, Suite 240, 15 Parkman St., Boston, MA 02114 (e-mail: kopans.daniel@mgh.harvard.edu).

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Studies such as the recent one by Beam et al. (1) that purport to evaluate the reading skills of radiologists interpreting screening mammograms only point out the pitfalls and complexities of these analyses. The only true test of a radiologist’s skill . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?