Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002 94(9):649; doi:10.1093/jnci/94.9.649
© 2002 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 94, No. 9, 649, May 1, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press

NEWS

Tests of Three Herbal Therapies Yield Disappointing Results

Katherine Arnold

As expert panels debate the best way to proceed with research into complementary and alternative medicine therapies (see story, p. 646), tests of three herbal treatments presented at this year’s annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research in San Francisco showed that they may not be as promising for cancer patients as was once believed.

Green Tea

Green tea contains polyphenols, the most potent of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

St. John’s Wort

PC-SPES


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?