Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2002 94(24):1824-1825; doi:10.1093/jnci/94.24.1824
© 2002 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Randal, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Randal, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 94, No. 24, 1824-1825, December 18, 2002
© 2002 Oxford University Press


NEWS

Erbitux Trial Flawed From the Beginning, Committee Finds

Judith Randal

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Until late last year, accelerated U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of Erbitux for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer seemed to be in the bag. In hindsight, however, the chances of that may have been remote.

Erbitux is made by ImClone Systems Inc., a small New York City biotechnology firm. On December 28, the FDA told the company that the drug would not get fast track approval because the application the firm had submitted to the agency for that purpose did not contain the requisite information. ImClone initially painted the refusal as the result of easily solved minor problems, thus suggesting that the approval—previously portrayed by the firm as imminent—would be only briefly delayed. (See News, March 6, p. 326.)

Also a factor in the Erbitux story . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. Erlichman and D. J. Sargent
New Treatment Options for Colorectal Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., July 22, 2004; 351(4): 391 - 392.
[Full Text] [PDF]