© 2001 by Oxford University Press
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, No. 17, 1297,
September 5, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
REVIEW |
Risk-Reduction Mastectomy: Clinical Issues and Research Needs
Affiliations of authors: M. Stefanek, W. Nelson, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; L. Hartmann, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Correspondence to: Michael Stefanek, Ph.D., National Institutes of Health, 6130 Executive Blvd., EPN 4066, Bethesda, MD 20892 (e-mail: ms496r{at}nih.gov).
Risk-reduction mastectomy (RRM), also known as bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, is a controversial clinical option for women who are at increased risk of breast cancer. High-risk women, including women with a strong family history of breast cancer and BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, have several clinical options: risk-reduction surgery (bilateral mastectomy and bilateral oophorectomy), surveillance (mammography, clinical breast examination, and breast self-examination), and chemoprevention (tamoxifen). We review research in a number of areas central to our understanding of RRM, including recent data on 1) the effectiveness of RRM in reducing breast cancer risk, 2) the perception of RRM among women at increased risk and health-care providers, 3) the decision-making process for follow-up care of women at high risk, and 4) satisfaction and psychological status after surgery. We suggest areas of future research to better guide high-risk women and their health-care providers in the decision-making process.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. M. Muggia The Emerging Roles of Screening and Prevention in Women's Cancer Oncologist, April 1, 2004; 9(2): 228 - 231. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wideroff, A. N. Freedman, L. Olson, C. N. Klabunde, W. Davis, K. P. Srinath, R. T. Croyle, and R. Ballard-Barbash Physician Use of Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility: Results of a National Survey Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2003; 12(4): 295 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. R. Grann, J. S. Jacobson, D. Thomason, D. Hershman, D. F. Heitjan, and A. I. Neugut Effect of Prevention Strategies on Survival and Quality-Adjusted Survival of Women With BRCA1/2 Mutations: An Updated Decision Analysis J. Clin. Oncol., May 15, 2002; 20(10): 2520 - 2529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Evans, A. Howell, A. Baildam, A. Brain, F. Lalloo, and P. Hopwood Re: Risk-Reduction Mastectomy: Clinical Issues and Research Needs J Natl Cancer Inst, February 20, 2002; 94(4): 307 - 307. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stefanek, L. Hartmann, and W. Nelson RESPONSE: Re: Risk-Reduction Mastectomy: Clinical Issues and Research Needs J Natl Cancer Inst, February 20, 2002; 94(4): 307 - 308. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Swanson Re: Risk-Reduction Mastectomy: Clinical Issues and Research Needs J Natl Cancer Inst, January 16, 2002; 94(2): 143 - 143. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stefanek, L. Hartmann, and W. Nelson RESPONSE: Re: Risk-Reduction Mastectomy: Clinical Issues and Research Needs J Natl Cancer Inst, January 16, 2002; 94(2): 143 - 144. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



