© 2001 by Oxford University Press
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, No. 17, 1293-1296,
September 5, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
COMMENTARY |
Why Most Randomized Phase II Cervical Cancer Chemoprevention Trials are Uninformative: Lessons for the Future
Affiliations of authors: M. Follen (Department of Gynecologic Oncology), E. N. Atkinson (Department of Biomathematics), The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; F. L. Meyskens, Jr., Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Irvine; D. Schottenfeld, Department of Epidemiology, The University of Michigan, School of Public Health I, Ann Arbor.
Correspondence to: Michele Follen, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Biomedical Engineering Center, Box 193, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030 (e-mail: mfollen@mdanderson.org).
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
According to the worldwide cancer incidence database maintained by the World Health Organization, cervical cancer is the third most common malignancy in women worldwide, exceeded in incidence only by breast and colorectal cancers (1). Cervical cancer is an important cause of mortality in women worldwide, and the cervix is a well-established clinical and histopathologic model of carcinogenesis. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the major etiologic agent in cervical cancer. The cervix is easily accessible for examination, and colposcopy provides a visual model of angiogenesis and tumor development, making the cervix a good model for preventive interventions (2).
The precursor lesions to cervical cancer are squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). SILs are used in the cytologic classification, and CINs are used in the histopathologic classification. Several chemoprevention trials have been conducted in women with SIL/CIN by use of retinoids, micronutrients,
-difluoromethylornithine, and indole-3-carbinol. Although
| NOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. Powers Interaction among Folate, Riboflavin, Genotype, and Cancer, with Reference to Colorectal and Cervical Cancer J. Nutr., December 1, 2005; 135(12): 2960S - 2966S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Ruffin, J. M. Bailey, D. P. Normolle, C. W. Michael, M. E. Bieniasz, D. C. Kmak, E. R. Unger, and D. E. Brenner Low-Dose Topical Delivery of All-Trans Retinoic Acid for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia II and III Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2148 - 2152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Tsao, E. S. Kim, and W. K. Hong Chemoprevention of Cancer CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2004; 54(3): 150 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Alvarez, M. G. Conner, H. Weiss, P. M. Klug, S. Niwas, U. Manne, J. Bacus, V. Kagan, K. C. Sexton, C. J. Grubbs, et al. The Efficacy of 9-Cis-Retinoic Acid (Aliretinoin) as a Chemopreventive Agent for Cervical Dysplasia: Results of a Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2003; 12(2): 114 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


