Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1999 91(21):1792-1793; doi:10.1093/jnci/91.21.1792
© 1999 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J. T., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 91, No. 21, 1792-1793, November 3, 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press


EDITORIALS

Risk/Benefit Assessment of Tamoxifen to Prevent Breast Cancer—Still a Work in Progress?

Anne L. Taylor, Lucile L. Adams-Campbell, Jackson T. Wright, Jr.

Affiliations of authors: A. L. Taylor, J. T. Wright, Jr., Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; L. L. Adams-Campbell, Howard University Cancer Center, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC.

Correspondence to: Jackson T. Wright, Jr., M.D., Ph.D., Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave., Wood Bl W-165, Cleveland, OH 44106-4982 (e-mail: jxw20@po.cwru.edu).

The selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), e.g., tamoxifen and raloxifene, represent an exciting new class of therapeutic agents, which may prove to be effective against a wide variety of conditions, including breast cancer, osteoporosis, and potentially other conditions. There are two principal limitations to the use of the currently available SERMs. First, the specificity of the mix of agonist and antagonist actions is limited. Newer agents with greater specificity hold the promise for highly targeted therapeutic actions with fewer undesirable side effects. Second, clinical trial data showing which populations benefit or suffer excessive risk from treatment with SERMs are very limited. It is with respect to this second limitation that Gail et al. (1), reporting in this issue of the Journal, have proposed estimates of benefits and risk for the use of tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer.

The authors use data, based primarily on the Breast . . . [Full Text of this Article]

NOTES

REFERENCES


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. L. Taylor, J. T. Wright Jr, R. S. Cooper, B. M. Psaty, A. L. Taylor, J. T. Wright Jr, R. S. Cooper, and B. M. Psaty
Importance of Race/Ethnicity in Clinical Trials: Lessons From the African-American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT), the African-American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK), and the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
Circulation, December 6, 2005; 112(23): 3654 - 3666.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. Fisher, J. P. Costantino, D. L. Wickerham, R. S. Cecchini, W. M. Cronin, A. Robidoux, T. B. Bevers, M. T. Kavanah, J. N. Atkins, R. G. Margolese, et al.
Tamoxifen for the Prevention of Breast Cancer: Current Status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 16, 2005; 97(22): 1652 - 1662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
aacredbookHome page
B. K. Dunn
Hormonal Interventions: From Adjuvant Therapy to Breast Cancer Prevention
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 1, 2005; 2005(1): 185 - 188.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. N. Freedman, B. I. Graubard, S. R. Rao, W. McCaskill-Stevens, R. Ballard-Barbash, and M. H. Gail
Estimates of the Number of U.S. Women Who Could Benefit From Tamoxifen for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 2, 2003; 95(7): 526 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
R. J Cersosimo
Tamoxifen for Prevention of Breast Cancer
Ann. Pharmacother., February 1, 2003; 37(2): 268 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. S. Kinsinger, R. Harris, S. H. Woolf, H. C. Sox, and K. N. Lohr
Chemoprevention of Breast Cancer: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, July 2, 2002; 137(1): 59 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. T. Chlebowski
Reducing the Risk of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., July 20, 2000; 343(3): 191 - 198.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. M. Lippman and P. H. Brown
RESPONSE: Re: Tamoxifen Prevention of Breast Cancer: an Instance of the Fingerpost
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 19, 2000; 92(8): 658 - 658.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. Fisher
RESPONSE: Re: Tamoxifen Prevention of Breast Cancer: an Instance of the Fingerpost
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 19, 2000; 92(8): 659 - 659.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. H. Gail, J. P. Costantino, J. Bryant, R. Croyle, L. Freedman, K. Helzlsouer, and V. Vogel
Response
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 5, 2000; 92(7): 574 - 574.
[Full Text] [PDF]