Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1997 89(7):497-505; doi:10.1093/jnci/89.7.497
© 1997 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal Of The National Cancer Institute, Vol 89, 497-505, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


REVIEWS

Portal vein chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 4000 patients in 10 studies. Liver Infusion Meta-analysis Group


BACKGROUND: Systemic delivery of cytotoxic drugs yields relatively low doses in the liver, a major site of recurrence for colorectal cancer. Giving chemotherapy by means of continuous portal vein infusion (PVI) into the liver during the immediate postoperative period may improve therapeutic efficacy. PURPOSE: We undertook a meta-analysis to assess the effects on recurrence and survival of administering fluorouracil (5- FU)-based chemotherapy by PVI after colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Data on mortality and recurrence were sought for all patients enrolled in randomized trials initiated before 1987 in which a few days (range, 5-7 days) of continuous postoperative PVI of cytotoxic drugs was compared with no further treatment. Data from 10 trials (a promising initial study and nine hypothesis-testing trials) involving about 4000 patients were available for analysis. The main cytotoxic drug in each trial was 5-FU (given with heparin); however, mitomycin C was co- administered in two of the trials. Four trials included an additional control group of patients treated with continuous noncytotoxic PVI of either heparin or urokinase alone; one trial included a second control group of patients treated with continuous systemic infusion of 5-FU. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Among the 3499 patients randomly assigned to receive either cytotoxic PVI or no further treatment, 1557 deaths are known to have occurred. Survival with and without PVI appeared to be the same for the first 2 years; thereafter, it diverged significantly, with the absolute survival difference (i.e., improvement) associated with PVI at 5 years being 4.7 % (standard deviation [SD] = 1.2 %) (P = .006). When just the nine hypothesis- testing trials were considered, the absolute survival difference was 3.6% (SD = 1.2%) (P = .04). If, ignoring any potential for bias in stage assignment, attention was restricted to patients with Dukes' stage A, B, or C disease (88.3% of the total), the absolute effect on 5- year survival for all 10 trials increased to 6.0% (SD = 1.8%) (P = .001); this estimate remained statistically significant when the initial study was excluded (absolute survival difference = 4.8%; SD = 1.8%; P = .01). In contrast to the highly significant reduction in liver metastases seen in the initial study (79% reduction; SD = 15%; P = .00000007), the reduction found in the nine hypothesis-testing trials was not significant (14% reduction; SD = 10%; P = .2). In the trials with additional control groups, survival appeared to be better with cytotoxic PVI than with noncytotoxic PVI or with systemic cytotoxic drug infusion. CONCLUSIONS: PVI of 5-FU (with or without other cytotoxic drugs) for about 1 week after surgery in patients with colorectal cancer may produce an absolute improvement in 5-year survival of a few percent. Although encouraging, this finding is not statistically secure, and additional evidence from randomized trials involving several thousand more patients is needed.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
B. M. Wolpin, J. A. Meyerhardt, H. J. Mamon, and R. J. Mayer
Adjuvant Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2007; 57(3): 168 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. Andre, D. Sargent, J. Tabernero, M. O'Connell, M. Buyse, A. Sobrero, J.-L. Misset, C. Boni, and A. de Gramont
Current Issues in Adjuvant Treatment of Stage II Colon Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 13(6): 887 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
F. Vigna-Taglianti, P. Vineis, A. Liberati, and F. Faggiano
Quality of systematic reviews used in guidelines for oncology practice
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2006; 17(4): 691 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
E. S. Ong, M. Poirier, and N. J. Espat
Hepatic Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2006; 13(2): 142 - 149.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Kasuya, D. K. Kuruppu, J. M. Donahue, E. W. Choi, H. Kawasaki, and K. K. Tanabe
Mouse Models of Subcutaneous Spleen Reservoir for Multiple Portal Venous Injections to Treat Liver Malignancies
Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 65(9): 3823 - 3827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Figueredo, M. L. Charette, J. Maroun, M. C. Brouwers, and L. Zuraw
Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review From the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-Based Care's Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group
J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2004; 22(16): 3395 - 3407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. B. Benson III, D. Schrag, M. R. Somerfield, A. M. Cohen, A. T. Figueredo, P. J. Flynn, M. K. Krzyzanowska, J. Maroun, P. McAllister, E. Van Cutsem, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Recommendations on Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II Colon Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2004; 22(16): 3408 - 3419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. L. Grem
Mature Results of Adjuvant Colon Cancer Trials From the Fluorouracil-Only Era
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 19, 2004; 96(10): 727 - 729.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. Labianca, R. Fossati, A. Zaniboni, V. Torri, S. Marsoni, D. Nitti, L. Boffi, M. Scatizzi, B. Tardio, N. Mastrodonato, et al.
Randomized Trial of Intraportal and/or Systemic Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Colon Carcinoma
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 19, 2004; 96(10): 750 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
Efficacy of Oral Adjuvant Therapy After Resection of Colorectal Cancer: 5-Year Results From Three Randomized Trials
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2004; 22(3): 484 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. M. Schuchter and D. G. Haller
Update in Oncology
Ann Intern Med, October 17, 2000; 133(8): 615 - 621.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. Mamounas, S. Wieand, N. Wolmark, H. D. Bear, J. N. Atkins, K. Song, J. Jones, and H. Rockette
Comparative Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Dukes' B Versus Dukes' C Colon Cancer: Results From Four National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Adjuvant Studies (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04)
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 1999; 17(5): 1349 - 1349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.