Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1997 89(7):480-487; doi:10.1093/jnci/89.7.480
© 1997 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dedrick, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Flessner, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dedrick, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Flessner, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal Of The National Cancer Institute, Vol 89, 480-487, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


REVIEWS

Pharmacokinetic problems in peritoneal drug administration: tissue penetration and surface exposure

RL Dedrick and MF Flessner
Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation Program, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Both theory and clinical studies demonstrate that drug concentrations in the peritoneal cavity can greatly exceed concentrations in the plasma following intraperitoneal administration. This regional advantage has been associated with clinical activity, including surgically documented complete responses in ovarian cancer patients with persistent or recurrent disease following systemic therapy, and has produced a survival advantage in a recent phase III trial. Two pharmacokinetic problems appear to limit the effectiveness of intraperitoneal therapy: poor tumor penetration by the drug and incomplete irrigation of serosal surfaces by the drug-containing solution. We have examined these problems in the context of a very simple, spatially distributed model. If D is the diffusivity of the drug in a tissue adjacent to the peritoneal cavity and k is the rate constant for removal of the drug from the tissue by capillary blood, the model predicts that (for slowly reacting drugs) the characteristic penetration distance is (D/k)1/2 and the apparent permeability of the surface of a peritoneal structure is (Dk)1/2. The permeability-area product used in classical pharmacokinetic calculations for the peritoneal cavity as a whole is the sum of the products of the tissue- specific permeabilities and the relevant superficial surface areas. Since the model is mechanistic, it provides insight into the expected effect of procedures such as pharmacologic manipulation or physical mixing. We observe that large changes in tissue penetration may be difficult to achieve but that we have very little information on the transport characteristics within tumors in this setting or their response to vasoactive drugs. Enhanced mixing is likely to offer significant potential for improved therapy; however, procedures easily applicable to the clinical setting have not been adequately investigated and should be given high priority. Clinical studies indicate that an increase in irrigated area may be achieved in many patients by individualizing the dialysate volume and consideration of patient position.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
P. H. Sugarbaker
Reported Impact of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy on Systemic Toxicity
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1800 - 1801.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
K. Shigeki, D. Baratti, and M. Deraco
Modalities of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1802 - 1803.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
E. deBree, H. Rosing, D. Filis, J. Romanos, M. Melisssourgaki, M. Daskalakis, M. Pilatou, E. Sanidas, P. Taflampas, K. Kalbakis, et al.
Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraoperative Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Paclitaxel: A Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 1183 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
E. A. Levine, B. M. Ronnett, P. F. Mansfield, and C. Eng
Overview of Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Dissemination of Appendiceal and Colorectal Neoplasms
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 153 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. H. Stewart IV, P. Shen, G. B. Russell, R. F. Bradley, J. C. Hundley, B. L. Loggie, K. R. Geisinger, and E. A. Levine
Appendiceal Neoplasms With Peritoneal Dissemination: Outcomes After Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2006; 13(5): 624 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. H. Stewart IV, P. Shen, and E. A. Levine
Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancy: Current Status and Future Directions
Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2005; 12(10): 765 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. R. Tzafriri, E. I. Lerner, M. Flashner-Barak, M. Hinchcliffe, E. Ratner, and H. Parnas
Mathematical Modeling and Optimization of Drug Delivery from Intratumorally Injected Microspheres
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 11(2): 826 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Sabbatini, C. Aghajanian, M. Leitao, E. Venkatraman, S. Anderson, J. Dupont, D. Dizon, C. O'Flaherty, J. Bloss, D. Chi, et al.
Intraperitoneal Cisplatin with Intraperitoneal Gemcitabine in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase I/II Trial
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 10(9): 2962 - 2967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. L. Rothenberg, P.Y. Liu, P. S. Braly, S. P. Wilczynski, E. V. Hannigan, S. Wadler, G. Stuart, C. Jiang, M. Markman, and D. S. Alberts
Combined Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Chemotherapy for Women With Optimally Debulked Ovarian Cancer: Results From an Intergroup Phase II Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2003; 21(7): 1313 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
T. E. Wilens, S. V. Faraone, J. Biederman, and S. Gunawardene
Does Stimulant Therapy of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Beget Later Substance Abuse? A Meta-analytic Review of the Literature
Pediatrics, January 1, 2003; 111(1): 179 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. F. FLESSNER, J. LOFTHOUSE, and E. R. ZAKARIA
Improving Contact Area between the Peritoneum and Intraperitoneal Therapeutic Solutions
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2001; 12(4): 807 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
F. MUGGIA, L. LIEBES, M. POTMESIL, A. HAMILTON, H. HOCHSTER, G. HORNREICH, J. SORICH, A. DOWNEY, and H. WASSERSTROM
Intraperitoneal Topoisomerase-I Inhibitors: Preliminary Findings with 9-Aminocamptothecin
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2000; 922(1): 178 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. A. Netti, D. A. Berk, M. A. Swartz, A. J. Grodzinsky, and R. K. Jain
Role of Extracellular Matrix Assembly in Interstitial Transport in Solid Tumors
Cancer Res., May 1, 2000; 60(9): 2497 - 2503.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.