Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1996 88(6):359-364; doi:10.1093/jnci/88.6.359
© 1996 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Colditz, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Colditz, G. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 88, No. 6, 359-364, March 20, 1996
© 1996 Oxford University Press

Nurses' Health Study: Log-Incidence Mathematical Model of Breast Cancer Incidence

Bernard Rosner, Graham A. Colditz

Channing Laboratory. Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA
Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, and Department of Epidemiology. Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA

Correspondence to: Bernard Rosner, Ph.D., Channing Laboratory. 180 Longwood Ave., Boston. MA 02115.

BACKGROUND:: In 1983, Pike et al. developed a mathematical model to quantify the effects of reproductive risk factors on the incidence of breast cancer. In 1994, we modified that model to correct some deficiencies in the original model, including a lack of terms for spacing of births and an inability to easily accommodate births after age 40 years. Our extended Pike model, while improving on the original, still had serious disadvantages, such as difficulty in translating model parameters into relative risks (RRs) and an incomplete fit to data that slightly overestimated incidence for premenopausal women with an early age at first birth and that underestimated incidence for post-menopausal women with a late age at first birth.

PURPOSE:: We undertook both the development of a new mathematical model to quantify the effects of reproductive risk factors on breast cancer incidence and validation of the model.

METHODS:: A new log-incidence model of breast cancer incidence was developed using nonlinear regression methods, and a study population consisting of 89 132 women in the Nurses' Health Study from which a total of 2249 incident cases of breast cancer were identified. Subjects were followed from the return of the 1976 Nurses' Health Study questionnaire until June 1, 1990, or until the last questionnaire was returned, until the development of any cancer, or until death, yielding 1 148 593 person-years of follow-up. The log-incidence models were fitted using iteratively reweighted least squares analysis.

RESULTS:: The log-incidence model provided a better fit to the data than the extended Pike model, with parameter estimates interpretable in terms of RRs. This new model can be fitted using standard commercially available statistical software. In the model, younger parous women are generally at slightly higher risk than nulliparous women, which is true for both the observed and expected RRs, and older parous women, aged 55–64 years with an early age at first birth, are at lower risk than nulliparous women, while older women with a late age at first birth are at substantially higher risk than nulliparous women.

CONCLUSION:: Log-incidence models, such as this one, provide an efficient framework for modeling the effect of lifestyle risk factors on breast cancer incidence that may be specifically targeted to certain time periods of a woman's reproductive life. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88:359–64]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. E. Chavarro, B. A. Rosner, L. Sampson, C. Willey, P. Tocco, W. C. Willett, Wm. C. Chumlea, and K. B. Michels
Validity of Adolescent Diet Recall 48 Years Later
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 18, 2009; (2009) kwp299v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. R. Cummings, J. A. Tice, S. Bauer, W. S. Browner, J. Cuzick, E. Ziv, V. Vogel, J. Shepherd, C. Vachon, R. Smith-Bindman, et al.
Prevention of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Approaches to Estimating and Reducing Risk
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 18, 2009; 101(6): 384 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
E. Linos, D. Spanos, B. A. Rosner, K. Linos, T. Hesketh, J. D. Qu, Y.-T. Gao, W. Zheng, and G. A. Colditz
Effects of Reproductive and Demographic Changes on Breast Cancer Incidence in China: A Modeling Analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 1, 2008; 100(19): 1352 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. G. Ziegler, W. F. Anderson, and M. H. Gail
Increasing Breast Cancer Incidence in China: The Numbers Add Up
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 1, 2008; 100(19): 1339 - 1341.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. J. Lord, L. Bernstein, K. A. Johnson, K. E. Malone, J. A. McDonald, P. A. Marchbanks, M. S. Simon, B. L. Strom, M. F. Press, S. G. Folger, et al.
Breast Cancer Risk and Hormone Receptor Status in Older Women by Parity, Age of First Birth, and Breastfeeding: A Case-Control Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2008; 17(7): 1723 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. Shakhar, H. B. Valdimarsdottir, and D. H. Bovbjerg
Heightened Risk of Breast Cancer Following Pregnancy: Could Lasting Systemic Immune Alterations Contribute?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1082 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. L. Teitelbaum, M. D. Gammon, J. A. Britton, A. I. Neugut, B. Levin, and S. D. Stellman
Reported Residential Pesticide Use and Breast Cancer Risk on Long Island, New York
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2007; 165(6): 643 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. H. Eliassen, S. A. Missmer, S. S. Tworoger, and S. E. Hankinson
Endogenous Steroid Hormone Concentrations and Risk of Breast Cancer: Does the Association Vary by a Woman's Predicted Breast Cancer Risk?
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2006; 24(12): 1823 - 1830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
D. A. Hill, E. Gilbert, G. M. Dores, M. Gospodarowicz, F. E. van Leeuwen, E. Holowaty, B. Glimelius, M. Andersson, T. Wiklund, C. F. Lynch, et al.
Breast cancer risk following radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: modification by other risk factors
Blood, November 15, 2005; 106(10): 3358 - 3365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. N. Freedman, D. Seminara, M. H. Gail, P. Hartge, G. A. Colditz, R. Ballard-Barbash, and R. M. Pfeiffer
Cancer Risk Prediction Models: A Workshop on Development, Evaluation, and Application
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 18, 2005; 97(10): 715 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. A. Colditz
Epidemiology and Prevention of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2005; 14(4): 768 - 772.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. A. Tice, R. Miike, K. Adduci, N. L. Petrakis, E. King, and M. R. Wrensch
Nipple Aspirate Fluid Cytology and the Gail Model for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in a Screening Population
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2005; 14(2): 324 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. A. Colditz, B. A. Rosner, W. Y. Chen, M. D. Holmes, and S. E. Hankinson
Risk Factors for Breast Cancer According to Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 4, 2004; 96(3): 218 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
N. Boyd, L. Martin, J. Stone, L. Little, S. Minkin, and M. Yaffe
A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Menopause on Mammographic Features
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2002; 11(10): 1048 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. H. Gail and J. P. Costantino
Validating and Improving Models for Projecting the Absolute Risk of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 7, 2001; 93(5): 334 - 335.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Clemons and P. Goss
Estrogen and the Risk of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., January 25, 2001; 344(4): 276 - 285.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
E. B Claus
Risk models in genetic epidemiology
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 2000; 9(6): 589 - 601.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
G. A. Colditz and B. Rosner
Cumulative Risk of Breast Cancer to Age 70 Years According to Risk Factor Status: Data from the Nurses' Health Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2000; 152(10): 950 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. S. Berkey, J. D. Gardner, A. Lindsay Frazier, and G. A. Colditz
Relation of Childhood Diet and Body Size to Menarche and Adolescent Growth in Girls
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2000; 152(5): 446 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. M. Gertig, I. E. Stillman, C. Byrne, D. Spiegelman, S. J. Schnitt, J. L. Connolly, G. A. Colditz, and D. J. Hunter
Association of Age and Reproductive Factors with Benign Breast Tissue Composition
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 1999; 8(10): 873 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.