Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1996 88(17):1216-1221; doi:10.1093/jnci/88.17.1216
© 1996 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helgesen, F.
Right arrow Articles by Adami, H.-O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Helgesen, F.
Right arrow Articles by Adami, H.-O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 88, No. 17, 1216-1221, September 4, 1996
© 1996 Oxford University Press

Trends in Prostate Cancer Survival in Sweden, 1960 Through 1988: Evidence of Increasing Diagnosis of Nonlethal Tumors

Fred Helgesen, Lars Holmberg, Jan-Erik Johansson, Reinhold Bergström, Hans-Olov Adami

Department of Urology, Örebro Medical Center Sweden
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, University Hospital Uppsala, Sweden
Department of Surgery and Department of Cancer Epidemiology, University Hospital Sweden
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, University Hospital, and Department of Statistics, Uppsala University Sweden
Department of Cancer Epidemiology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA

Hans-Olov Adami, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Cancer Epidemiology, University Hospital, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.

BACKGROUND:: The incidence of prostate cancer has increased during the past 30 years but has been paralleled by increases in survival rates from this disease, despite the absence of documented major improvement in curative treatment. Since a high prevalence of microscopic prostate cancer has been observed in autopsied men and because many prostate cancers may never surface clinically, increased diagnostic activities might have led to increased detection of less aggressive tumors.

PURPOSE:: This study was conducted to elucidate whether the trends in prostate cancer incidence and patient survival may be due to increasing diagnoses of nonlethal tumors.

METHODS:: We analyzed a population-based cohort comprising all cases of prostate cancer (n = 80 901) detected in Sweden during the period of 1960 through 1988. Five hundred eighteen patients (0.64% of the total number) who could not be followed because of emigration or an incomplete national registration number were excluded. Observed and relative survival rates were calculated for the entire cohort of 80 383 assessable patients per 5-year age group in 5-year periods of diagnosis and according to diagnostic method and were compared between geographic areas with differences in incidence rates. To estimate the independent effects of these determinants, multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS:: For the 80 383 patients with complete follow-up, the 10- and 20-year observed survival rates were 17.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 17.2%–17.9%) and 3.5% (95% CI = 3.2%–3.7%), and the relative survival rates were 41.1% (95% CI = 40.3%–41.9%) and 28.6% (95% CI = 26.5%–30.1%), respectively. Relative survival rates improved markedly over time; 10-year relative survival rates increased from 29% (95% CI = 27%–31%) among case patients diagnosed in 1960 through 1964 to 45% (95% CI = 43%–46%) among those diagnosed in 1975 through 1979. Relative survival rates leveled off after about 18 years at 18% (95% CI = 15%–20%) among patients diagnosed in 1960 through 1964 and at 31% (95% CI = 28%–34%) among those diagnosed in 1970 through 1974. An even more favorable outlook was observed in those case patients diagnosed later. In areas with a high or low incidence of prostate cancer, the 10-year relative survival rates were 45% (95% CI = 44%–47%) and 36% (95% CI = 34%–38%), respectively. In the early 1960s, the calculated loss of life expectancy after diagnosis varied from about 68% (95% CI = 61%–75%) of the expected length of life in the youngest age group to about 48% (95% CI = 46%–50%) in the oldest age group. From 1960 through 1964 to 1985 through 1988, the loss of life expectancy decreased by more than 50% in all age groups. The differences in relative survival rates between age groups were small, with a gradual decrease in age groups more than 60–64 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS:: Most of the great temporal improvement and geographic variation in survival rates are quantitatively consistent, with likely increases in the rate of detection of nonlethal tumors.

IMPLICATIONS:: The increase in relative survival rates must be taken into consideration when evaluating the outcome of treatment of prostate cancer, since nonrandomized comparisons may be confounded by time trends. Diagnosis of nonlethal tumors raises concerns because the individual would suffer from the psychologic burden of a cancer diagnosis without any therapeutic benefit. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1216–21]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
K. AKAMATSU, M.-A. SHIBATA, Y. ITO, Y. SOHMA, H. AZUMA, and Y. OTSUKI
Riluzole Induces Apoptotic Cell Death in Human Prostate Cancer Cells via Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress
Anticancer Res, June 1, 2009; 29(6): 2195 - 2204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. Bill-Axelson, L. Holmberg, F. Filen, M. Ruutu, H. Garmo, C. Busch, S. Nordling, M. Haggman, S.-O. Andersson, S. Bratell, et al.
Radical Prostatectomy Versus Watchful Waiting in Localized Prostate Cancer: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 Randomized Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 20, 2008; 100(16): 1144 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. Kvale, A. Auvinen, H.-O. Adami, A. Klint, E. Hernes, B. Moller, E. Pukkala, H. H. Storm, L. Tryggvadottir, S. Tretli, et al.
Interpreting Trends in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the Five Nordic Countries
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 19, 2007; 99(24): 1881 - 1887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J.-E. Johansson, O. Andren, S.-O. Andersson, P. W. Dickman, L. Holmberg, A. Magnuson, and H.-O. Adami
Natural History of Early, Localized Prostate Cancer
JAMA, June 9, 2004; 291(22): 2713 - 2719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Azuma, T. Inamoto, T. Sakamoto, S. Kiyama, T. Ubai, Y. Shinohara, K. Maemura, M. Tsuji, N. Segawa, H. Masuda, et al.
{gamma}-Aminobutyric Acid as a Promoting Factor of Cancer Metastasis; Induction of Matrix Metalloproteinase Production Is Potentially Its Underlying Mechanism
Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8090 - 8096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Krongrad, H. Lai, and S. Lai
Survival After Radical Prostatectomy
JAMA, July 2, 1997; 278(1): 44 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. C. Albertsen
Urology
JAMA, June 18, 1997; 277(23): 1904 - 1905.
[PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J.-E. Johansson, L. Holmberg, S. Johansson, R. Bergstrom, and H.-O. Adami
Fifteen-Year Survival in Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Population-Based Study in Sweden
JAMA, February 12, 1997; 277(6): 467 - 471.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. C. Walsh and J. D. Brooks
The Swedish Prostate Cancer Paradox
JAMA, February 12, 1997; 277(6): 497 - 498.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.