Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1994 86(8):600-607; doi:10.1093/jnci/86.8.600
© 1994 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spiegelman, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hertzmark, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spiegelman, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hertzmark, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 86, No. 8, 600-607, April 20, 1994
© 1994 Oxford University Press

Validation of the Gail et al. Model for Predicting Individual Breast Cancer Risk

Donna Spiegelman*,, Graham A. Colditz, David Hunter, Ellen Hertzmark

*Department of Epidemiology and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health Boston, Mass
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health Boston, Mass
The Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health Boston

Donna Spiegelman, Sc D., Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115.

Background: The Gail et al. model is considered the best available means for estimating an individual woman's risk of developing breast cancer. Such estimates are useful in decision making on the part of women, in designing prevention trials, and in targeting screening and prevention efforts. Purpose: Our purpose was to evaluate the ability of the model to accurately predict individual breast cancer risk, using a large population independent of the one from which the model was derived. Methods: We compared the number of cancer cases predicted by the model to the actual number of cases observed in the Nurses' Health Study. The study population was 115 172 women who did not have breast cancer at the beginning of the study. Questionnaires were sent to participants every 2 years, seeking data on risk factors and diagnoses of breast cancer. Follow-up compliance was 95% over the 12-year study period. Results: The model overpredicted absolute breast cancer risk by 33% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 28%–39%), with the overprediction more than twofold among premenopausal women (95% CI = 1.9–2.2), among women with extensive family history of breast cancer (95% CI = 1.1–3.9), and among women with age at first birth younger than 20 years (95% CI = 1.3–4.7). The correlation coefficient between observed and predicted risk was 0.67, indicating that the model is less than satisfactory for ranking individual levels of breast cancer risk. Overprediction occurred at all deciles of predicted risk. Conclusions: The model's performance is unsatisfactory for estimating breast cancer risk for individual women aged 25–61 years who do not participate in annual screening. Lower mammography screening rates in the Nurses' Health Study may account for some, but not all, of the discrepancy between observed and predicted cases. Implications: A recent modification of the model by the tamoxifen trial investigators is likely to have provided accurate power calculations. This modified form of the model should be useful for planning other large, population-based studies. [J Natl Cancer Inst 86: 600–607, 1994]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
K. Visvanathan, R. T. Chlebowski, P. Hurley, N. F. Col, M. Ropka, D. Collyar, M. Morrow, C. Runowicz, K. I. Pritchard, K. Hagerty, et al.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on the Use of Pharmacologic Interventions Including Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and Aromatase Inhibition for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2009; 27(19): 3235 - 3258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. R. Cummings, J. A. Tice, S. Bauer, W. S. Browner, J. Cuzick, E. Ziv, V. Vogel, J. Shepherd, C. Vachon, R. Smith-Bindman, et al.
Prevention of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Approaches to Estimating and Reducing Risk
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 18, 2009; 101(6): 384 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. S. Pankratz, L. C. Hartmann, A. C. Degnim, R. A. Vierkant, K. Ghosh, C. M. Vachon, M. H. Frost, S. D. Maloney, C. Reynolds, and J. C. Boughey
Assessment of the Accuracy of the Gail Model in Women With Atypical Hyperplasia
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2008; 26(33): 5374 - 5379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. T. Chlebowski, G. L. Anderson, D. S. Lane, A. K. Aragaki, T. Rohan, S. Yasmeen, G. Sarto, C. A. Rosenberg, F. A. Hubbell, and For the Women's Health Initiative Investigators
Predicting Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women by Hormone Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2007; 99(22): 1695 - 1705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol Res NursHome page
D. Lithgow, A. Nyamathi, D. Elashoff, O. Martinez-Maza, and C. Covington
C-reactive Protein in Nipple Aspirate Fluid Associated With Gail Model Factors
Biol Res Nurs, October 1, 2007; 9(2): 108 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
Y. M. Coyle, X.-J. Xie, C. M. Lewis, D. Bu, S. Milchgrub, and D. M. Euhus
Role of Physical Activity in Modulating Breast Cancer Risk as Defined by APC and RASSF1A Promoter Hypermethylation in Nonmalignant Breast Tissue
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2007; 16(2): 192 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. G. Elmore and S. W. Fletcher
The Risk of Cancer Risk Prediction: "What Is My Risk of Getting Breast Cancer?"
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 6, 2006; 98(23): 1673 - 1675.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. Decarli, S. Calza, G. Masala, C. Specchia, D. Palli, and M. H. Gail
Gail Model for Prediction of Absolute Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer: Independent Evaluation in the Florence-European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition Cohort
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 6, 2006; 98(23): 1686 - 1693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. L. Bondy and L. A. Newman
Assessing breast cancer risk: evolution of the gail model.
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 6, 2006; 98(17): 1172 - 1173.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. E. Barlow, E. White, R. Ballard-Barbash, P. M. Vacek, L. Titus-Ernstoff, P. A. Carney, J. A. Tice, D. S. M. Buist, B. M. Geller, R. Rosenberg, et al.
Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography.
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 6, 2006; 98(17): 1204 - 1214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A. Kendall and M. Dowsett
Novel concepts for the chemoprevention of breast cancer through aromatase inhibition.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2006; 13(3): 827 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
R. Taylor and K. Taguchi
Tamoxifen For Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: Low Uptake by High-Risk Women After Evaluation of a Breast Lump
Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(3): 242 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. A. Tice, R. Miike, K. Adduci, N. L. Petrakis, E. King, and M. R. Wrensch
Nipple Aspirate Fluid Cytology and the Gail Model for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in a Screening Population
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2005; 14(2): 324 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. M. Lewis, L. R. Cler, D.-W. Bu, S. Zochbauer-Muller, S. Milchgrub, E. Z. Naftalis, A. M. Leitch, J. D. Minna, and D. M. Euhus
Promoter Hypermethylation in Benign Breast Epithelium in Relation to Predicted Breast Cancer Risk
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 11(1): 166 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
L. A. Newman
Breast Cancer in African-American Women
Oncologist, January 1, 2005; 10(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
B. Arun
Ductal Lavage and Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer
Oncologist, November 1, 2004; 9(6): 599 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Pichert, B. Bolliger, K. Buser, and O. Pagani
Evidence-based management options for women at increased breast/ovarian cancer risk
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2003; 14(1): 9 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. S. Kinsinger, R. Harris, S. H. Woolf, H. C. Sox, and K. N. Lohr
Chemoprevention of Breast Cancer: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, July 2, 2002; 137(1): 59 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. McTiernan, A. Kuniyuki, Y. Yasui, D. Bowen, W. Burke, J. B. Culver, R. Anderson, and S. Durfy
Comparisons of Two Breast Cancer Risk Estimates in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2001; 10(4): 333 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. H. Gail and J. P. Costantino
Validating and Improving Models for Projecting the Absolute Risk of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 7, 2001; 93(5): 334 - 335.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. Rockhill, D. Spiegelman, C. Byrne, D. J. Hunter, and G. A. Colditz
Validation of the Gail et al. Model of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction and Implications for Chemoprevention
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 7, 2001; 93(5): 358 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
E. B Claus
Risk models in genetic epidemiology
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 2000; 9(6): 589 - 601.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
H. J. Smedira
Practical Issues in Counseling Healthy Women About Their Breast Cancer Risk and Use of Tamoxifen Citrate
Arch Intern Med, November 13, 2000; 160(20): 3034 - 3042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. J. Fabian, B. F. Kimler, C. M. Zalles, J. R. Klemp, S. Kamel, S. Zeiger, and M. S. Mayo
Short-Term Breast Cancer Prediction by Random Periareolar Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and the Gail Risk Model
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 2, 2000; 92(15): 1217 - 1227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
D M Eccles, D G R Evans, and J Mackay
Guidelines for a genetic risk based approach to advising women with a family history of breast cancer
J. Med. Genet., March 1, 2000; 37(3): 203 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. Armstrong, A. Eisen, and B. Weber
Assessing the Risk of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., February 24, 2000; 342(8): 564 - 571.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. Garber
A 40-Year-Old Woman With a Strong Family History of Breast Cancer
JAMA, November 24, 1999; 282(20): 1953 - 1960.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. H. Gail, J. P. Costantino, J. Bryant, R. Croyle, L. Freedman, K. Helzlsouer, and V. Vogel
Weighing the Risks and Benefits of Tamoxifen Treatment for Preventing Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 3, 1999; 91(21): 1829 - 1846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. P. Costantino, M. H. Gail, D. Pee, S. Anderson, C. K. Redmond, J. Benichou, and H. S. Wieand
Validation Studies for Models Projecting the Risk of Invasive and Total Breast Cancer Incidence
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 15, 1999; 91(18): 1541 - 1548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
V. C. Jordan and M. Morrow
Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and the Prevention of Breast Cancer
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 1999; 20(3): 253 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. Brunoski, L. H. Powell, J. A. Blackman, T. L. Bush, K.S. Joseph, W. D. Dupont, D.R. Wigg, A. Z. Bluming, G. A. Colditz, W. C. Willett, et al.
Breast Cancer and Hormone-Replacement Therapy
N. Engl. J. Med., November 16, 1995; 333(20): 1355 - 1358.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.