Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1993 85(21):1748-1751; doi:10.1093/jnci/85.21.1748
© 1993 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woolas, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bast, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woolas, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bast, R. C., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 85, No. 21, 1748-1751, November 3, 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press

Elevation of Multiple Serum Markers in Patients With Stage I Ovarian Cancer

Robert P. Woolas, Feng-Ji Xu, Ian J. Jacabs, Yin-Hua Yu, Lee Daly, Andrew Brechuck, John T. Soper, Daniel L. Clarke-pearson, David H. Oram, Robert C. Bast, Jr.*,

R. P. Woolas, I. J. Jacobs, D. H. Oram, The Royal London Hospital, Cambridge University London, England
Duke University Medical Center Durham, N.C.

Correspondence to: Robert C. Bast, Jr., M.D., Box 3843, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

BACKGROUND: The high overall mortality from ovarian cancer (>60%) relates, in part, to delays in diagnosis. When ovarian cancer is detected in stage I (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging), up to 90% of patients can be cured. Transvaginal sonography can detect early-stage disease with great sensitivity, but it is expensive and lacks specificity. Although serum marker assays could provide a less expensive and more convenient initial screening test, the sensitivity of assays varies. Measurement of serum CA 125 in conjunction with ultrasound screening as a second-line test confers high specificity but detects only about one half of early stage ovarian carcinomas.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether assays of multiple serum markers would improve sensitivity by detecting a higher percentage of stage I ovarian cancers than the CA 125 assay alone.

METHODS: Using immu-noradiometric assays, we measured preoperative serum levels of CA 125 tumor-associated antigen, mac-rophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), and OVX1 in 46 patients with stage I ovarian cancer of different histologies and 237 patients with benign pelvic masses. We also assayed sera from 204 apparently healthy women who had participated in a screening trial and remained free from cancer at 1 year of follow-up. All specimens were obtained from cryopreserved aliquots. Marker levels were considered to be elevated when levels of CA 125 were greater than 30 U/mL, M-CSF levels were greater than 3.1 ng/mL, or OVX1 levels were greater than 12.1 U/mL.

RESULTS: At least one of the serum markers was elevated in 98% of patients with stage I ovarian cancer; CA 125 levels were elevated in 67%. By the same criteria, 11% of healthy individuals and 51% of patients with benign pelvic masses had at least one elevated marker value. Thus, the sensitivity of the combination of assays for the three serum markers was significantly greater than the sensitivity of the CA 125 assay (P<.0005) and specificity was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS: A panel of these three tumor markers can identify early-stage ovarian cancer with extremely high sensitivity and moderate specificity.

IMPLICATIONS: Elevation of one or more serum markers should be evaluated further as an Indication for transvaginal sonogra-phy in apparently healthy women. Such a strategy might substantially reduce the expense and improve the specificity of screening compared to the use of ultrasound alone. Prospective studies with a large cohort of patients at high risk for ovarian cancer will be required to confirm these findings. [J Natl Cancer Inst 85:1748–1751, 1993]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. L. Clarke-Pearson
Screening for Ovarian Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., July 9, 2009; 361(2): 170 - 177.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
J. M. Koomen, E. B. Haura, G. Bepler, R. Sutphen, E. R. Remily-Wood, K. Benson, M. Hussein, L. A. Hazlehurst, T. J. Yeatman, L. T. Hildreth, et al.
Proteomic Contributions to Personalized Cancer Care
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2008; 7(10): 1780 - 1794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. Henic, C. Borgfeldt, I. J. Christensen, B. Casslen, and G. Hoyer-Hansen
Cleaved Forms of the Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor in Plasma Have Diagnostic Potential and Predict Postoperative Survival in Patients with Ovarian Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 14(18): 5785 - 5793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. J. C. Shan, A. Scorilas, D. Katsaros, I. Rigault de la Longrais, M. Massobrio, and E. P. Diamandis
Unfavorable Prognostic Value of Human Kallikrein 7 Quantified by ELISA in Ovarian Cancer Cytosols
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2006; 52(10): 1879 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Mor, I. Visintin, Y. Lai, H. Zhao, P. Schwartz, T. Rutherford, L. Yue, P. Bray-Ward, and D. C. Ward
Serum protein markers for early detection of ovarian cancer
PNAS, May 24, 2005; 102(21): 7677 - 7682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. T. Baron, C. H. Boardman, J. M. Lafky, A. Rademaker, D. Liu, D. A. Fishman, K. C. Podratz, and N. J. Maihle
Soluble Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (SEG-FR) and Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) as Screening and Diagnostic Tests for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2005; 14(2): 306 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. J. Skates, N. Horick, Y. Yu, F.-J. Xu, A. Berchuck, L. J. Havrilesky, H. W.A. de Bruijn, A. G.J. van der Zee, R. P. Woolas, I. J. Jacobs, et al.
Preoperative Sensitivity and Specificity for Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer When Combining Cancer Antigen CA-125II, CA 15-3, CA 72-4, and Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Using Mixtures of Multivariate Normal Distributions
J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2004; 22(20): 4059 - 4066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
I. J. Jacobs and U. Menon
Progress and Challenges in Screening for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2004; 3(4): 355 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. M. Yousef, A. Scorilas, D. Katsaros, S. Fracchioli, L. Iskander, C. Borgono, I. A. Rigault de la Longrais, M. Puopolo, M. Massobrio, and E. P. Diamandis
Prognostic Value of the Human Kallikrein Gene 15 Expression in Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2003; 21(16): 3119 - 3126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. C. Bast Jr
Status of Tumor Markers in Ovarian Cancer Screening
J. Clin. Oncol., May 15, 2003; 21(90100): 200s - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. P. Diamandis, A. Scorilas, S. Fracchioli, M. van Gramberen, H. de Bruijn, A. Henrik, A. Soosaipillai, L. Grass, G. M. Yousef, U.-H. Stenman, et al.
Human Kallikrein 6 (hK6): A New Potential Serum Biomarker for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Ovarian Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2003; 21(6): 1035 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of HealthHome page
A secondary interpretation is needed on serum CA 125 levels in case of serosal involvement
Perspectives in Public Health, December 1, 2000; 120(4): 268 - 270.
[PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Gong, N. Nikrui, D. Chen, S. Koido, Z. Wu, Y. Tanaka, S. Cannistra, D. Avigan, and D. Kufe
Fusions of Human Ovarian Carcinoma Cells with Autologous or Allogeneic Dendritic Cells Induce Antitumor Immunity
J. Immunol., August 1, 2000; 165(3): 1705 - 1711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. V.S. Hogdall, C. K. Hogdall, S. K. Kjaer, F. Xu, Y. Yu, R. C. Bast, J. Blaakaer, and I. J. Jacobs
OVX1 Radioimmunoassay Results Are Dependent on the Method of Sample Collection and Storage
Clin. Chem., May 1, 1999; 45(5): 692 - 694.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
H. T. Lynch, M. J. Casey, T. G. Shaw, and J. F. Lynch
Hereditary Factors in Gynecologic Cancer
Oncologist, October 1, 1998; 3(5): 319 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Y. Xu, Z. Shen, D. W. Wiper, M. Wu, R. E. Morton, P. Elson, A. W. Kennedy, J. Belinson, M. Markman, and G. Casey
Lysophosphatidic Acid as a Potential Biomarker for Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancers
JAMA, August 26, 1998; 280(8): 719 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. A. Roberts
Searching for a Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer
JAMA, August 26, 1998; 280(8): 739 - 739.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
H. A. Fritsche and R. C. Bast
CA 125 in Ovarian Cancer: Advances and Controversy
Clin. Chem., July 1, 1998; 44(7): 1379 - 1380.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. Eagle and J. A. Ledermann
Tumor Markers in Ovarian Malignancies
Oncologist, October 1, 1997; 2(5): 324 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
I. J Jacobs, S. Skates, A. P. Davies, R. P Woolas, A. Jeyerajah, P. Weidemann, K. Sibley, and D. H Oram
Risk of diagnosis of ovarian cancer after raised serum CA 125 concentration: a prospective cohort study
BMJ, November 30, 1996; 313(7069): 1355 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.