Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1993 85(21):1732-1742; doi:10.1093/jnci/85.21.1732
© 1993 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levin, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hryniuk, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levin, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hryniuk, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 85, No. 21, 1732-1742, November 3, 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press

Importance of Multiagent Chemotherapy Regimens in Ovarian Carcinoma: Dose Intensity Analysis

Leslie Levin, Richard Simon, William Hryniuk*

Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Ontario and London Regional Cancer Center London, Ont., Canada
Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Md
University of California at San Diego Cancer Center, San Diego Calif

Correspondence to: Leslie Levin, M.D., London Regional Cancer Center, 790 Commissioners Rd. East, London, ON, Canada N6A 4L6

BACKGROUND: Background: In the previous mets-analysis of dose intensity (dosage) of chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer, we analyzed data on cyclophosphamide, altretamine (hexamethylmelamine), doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Only cisplatin showed statistically significant association of complete and partial clinical response with dose intensity.

PURPOSE: This analysis updates the previous results and further characterizes response to cisplatin alone or in multiagent regimens.

METHODS: We analyzed data from 18 regimens containing platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) that were used In nine new randomized trials, in addition to data from the 60 groups of patients in our previous study in which responses were reported. Relative dose intensity was calculated as a fraction of the dosage of a drug in the standard regimen of cyclophosphamide, altretamine, doxorubicin, and platinum (CHAP). We performed single and multiple regression analyses to determine the relationship between disease outcome and relative dose intensity for cyclophosphamide, platinum, and doxorubicin alone or in combination.

RESULTS: The association between outcome and dose intensity for platinum alone or in multiagent regimens was statistically significant. This association was of borderline significance for cyclophosphamide alone but was not significant for this drug in multiagent regimens. There were insufficient data to test the relationship for doxorubicin as a single agent, but in multiagent regimens, the relationship was borderline (P = .05). Multiagent regimens containing platinum produced greater response rates than platinum alone for any fixed, planned relative dose intensity for platinum.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results support other published findings that use of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin increases the efficacy of single-agent platinum. Relative dose intensity values for cyclophosphamide used alone were larger than those used in multiagent regimens, which might explain why the relationship between relative dose intensity and outcome for cyclophosphamide was not significant for use in multiagent regimens. Similarly, none of the multiagent regimens incorporated doxorubicin at a relative dose intensity for which the drug is found to be effective as a single agent.

IMPLICATIONS: Prospective clinical trials are required to test the effect of higher relative dose intensity for doxorubicin and cyclophosphaniide added to platinum in advanced ovarian cancer. An important element in the design of prospective trials will be to test for the relative importance of dose intensity versus total dose. This testing is best achieved in a three-arm study design such as that reported in adjuvant treatment of stage II breast cancer conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. [J NatI Cancer Inst 85:1732–1742, 1993]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
H. K. Dressman, A. Berchuck, G. Chan, J. Zhai, A. Bild, R. Sayer, J. Cragun, J. Clarke, R. S. Whitaker, L. Li, et al.
An Integrated Genomic-Based Approach to Individualized Treatment of Patients With Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2007; 25(5): 517 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P Pedrazzoli, J. Ledermann, J-P Lotz, S Leyvraz, M Aglietta, G Rosti, K. Champion, S Secondino, F Selle, N Ketterer, et al.
High dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support for solid tumors other than breast cancer in adults
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2006; 17(10): 1479 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. Thigpen
Maybe More Is Better
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2003; 21(13): 2454 - 2456.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. E. Bristow, R. S. Tomacruz, D. K. Armstrong, E. L. Trimble, and F. J. Montz
Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma During the Platinum Era: A Meta-Analysis
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2002; 20(5): 1248 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
T. Makatsoris and M. V. Seiden
High-Dose Therapy for Ovarian Carcinoma
Oncologist, October 1, 1997; 2(5): 330 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. Smith, J. Abrams, E. L. Trimble, and R. S. Ungerleider
Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy for Childhood Cancers
Oncologist, October 1, 1996; 1(5): 293 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.