Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1993 85(14):1154-1159; doi:10.1093/jnci/85.14.1154
© 1993 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ray, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Moran, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ray, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Moran, R. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 85, No. 14, 1154-1159, July 21, 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press

Phase I Study of (6R)-5, 10-Dideazatetrahydrofolate: a Folate Antimetabolite Inhibitory to De Novo Purine Synthesis

Margaret S. Ray, Franco M. Muggia, C. Gail Leichman, Steven M. Grunberg, Robert L. Nelson, Richard W. Dyke, Richard G. Moran

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Southern California Los Angeles
Department of Biochemistry, University of Southern California Los Angeles
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Ind.

Correspondence to: Franco M. Muggia, M.D., Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rra. 162, 1441 Eastlake Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90033.

Background: Cancer chemotherapy with folate antimetabolites has been traditionally targeted at the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase and is based on the requirement of dividing tumor cells for a supply of thymidylate and purines. However, a new compound, 5, 10-dideazatetrahydrofolate (DDATHF, whose 6R diastereomer is also known as Lometrexol), has become available that prevents tumor cell growth by inhibiting the first of the folatedependent enzymes involved in de novo purine synthesis, glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. Purpose: We investigated the toxicity and therapeutic activity of DDATHF in a phase I clinical trial. Methods: DDATHF was given at one of the following dose levels to 33 patients (16 females and 17 males) with malignant solid tumors: 3.0 mg/m per week (level A) to 10 patients, 4.5 mg/m per week (level B) to 13 patients, or 6.0 mg/m per week (level C) to 10 patients. Each drug cycle consisted of three weekly injections of DDATHF followed by a 2-week rest prior to redosing in the next cycle. Results: Of 33 patients, 27 received at least one full cycle of DDATHF. Thrombocytopenia was the major doselimiting toxicity, and it was severe in one of 10 patients during the first cycle and in two of four patients during the second cycle. Because of cumulative toxicity at 6.0 mg/m, second or later cycles were abbreviated to two weekly doses. Stomatitis was generally mild, but it was doselimiting in one patient. Neutropenia was infrequent and mild, and normocytic anemia requiring blood transfusion was common with repeat dosing. Leucovorin was given for grade 2 or greater thrombocytopenia and resulted in hematologic recovery within 1 week in all eight patients so treated. Without leucovorin, the thrombocytopenia lasted from 7 to 49 days in three patients. A partial response was noted in one patient with non-small-cell lung cancer and a minor response in one patient with breast cancer. Three patients with colorectal cancer achieved stable disease for greater than 3 months with improvement in carcinoembryonic antigen levels in one patient. Conclusions: DDATHF has an unusual pattern of toxicity with repetitive dosing, and humans with advanced cancer are considerably more sensitive than would be predicted from previous animal studies. Although doses of 6.0 mg/m per week on our schedule have been determined to be safe, repeated cycles require careful monitoring because of cumulative toxic effects. Implications: Additional phase I studies of DDATHF that relate toxicity to folate intake and tissue folate pools appear warranted. [J Natl Cancer Inst 85:1154–1159, 1993]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
K. Robien
Folate During Antifolate Chemotherapy: What We Know... and Do Not Know
Nutr Clin Pract, August 1, 2005; 20(4): 411 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. L. Bronder and R. G. Moran
A Defect in the p53 Response Pathway Induced by de Novo Purine Synthesis Inhibition
J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 48861 - 48871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. L. Bronder and R. G. Moran
Antifolates Targeting Purine Synthesis Allow Entry of Tumor Cells into S Phase Regardless of p53 Function
Cancer Res., September 15, 2002; 62(18): 5236 - 5241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
X. Lu, J. Errington, V. J. Chen, N. J. Curtin, A. V. Boddy, and D. R. Newell
Cellular ATP Depletion by LY309887 as a Predictor of Growth Inhibition in Human Tumor Cell Lines
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2001; 6(1): 271 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. L. McLeod, J. Cassidy, R. H. Powrie, D. G. Priest, M. A. Zorbas, T. W. Synold, S. Shibata, D. Spicer, D. Bissett, Y. K. Pithavala, et al.
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of the Glycinamide Ribonucleotide Formyltransferase Inhibitor AG2034
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2000; 6(7): 2677 - 2684.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Tse and R. G. Moran
Cellular Folates Prevent Polyglutamation of 5,10-Dideazatetrahydrofolate. A NOVEL MECHANISM OF RESISTANCE TO FOLATE ANTIMETABOLITES
J. Biol. Chem., October 2, 1998; 273(40): 25944 - 25952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
C. H. Takimoto
New Antifolates: Pharmacology and Clinical Applications
Oncologist, February 1, 1996; 1(1): 68 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.