Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on April 28, 2009
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2009 101(9):644-650; doi:10.1093/jnci/djp067
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/9/644    most recent
djp067v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Malley, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pritchard, K. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O’Malley, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pritchard, K. I.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press.

ARTICLES

Topoisomerase II Alpha and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Chemotherapy

F. P. O’Malley, S. Chia, D. Tu, L. E. Shepherd, M. N. Levine, V. H. Bramwell, I. L. Andrulis, K. I. Pritchard

Affiliations of authors: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (FPO, ILA); Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology (FPO, ILA), Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (KIP), and Department of Medicine (KIP), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (SC); Department of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (SC); Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (DT, LES); Department of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (MNL); Department of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (VHB); Department of Medical Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (VHB); Fred A. Litwin Centre for Cancer Genetics, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (ILA)

Correspondence to: Kathleen I. Pritchard, MD, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5 (e-mail: kathy.pritchard{at}sunnybrook.ca).

Background: Amplification or deletion of the topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) gene in breast cancers has been postulated to be more closely associated with responsiveness to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy than amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) gene.

Methods: We studied 438 tumors from 710 premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer who received cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) as adjuvant chemotherapy in the randomized National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Mammary 5 (MA.5) trial. TOP2A alterations and HER2 amplification were quantified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The association of TOP2A and HER2 status with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two treatment groups was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves, the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard models. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: In patients whose tumors showed TOP2A alterations (either amplifications or deletions), treatment with CEF was statistically significantly superior to treatment with CMF in terms of RFS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.17 to 0.73, P = .005) and OS (adjusted HR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.75, P = .008). In patients without TOP2A amplification or deletion, the corresponding adjusted hazard ratios for RFS and OS were 0.90 (95% CI = 0.66 to 1.23, P = .49) and 1.09 (95% CI = 0.77 to 1.56, P = .62). Adjusted tests of interaction between treatment and TOP2A status were P = .09 for RFS and P = .02 for OS. Adjusted tests of interaction between treatment and HER2 status were P = .008 for RFS and P = .02 for OS.

Conclusion: TOP2A gene alterations (amplifications or deletions) are associated with an increase in responsiveness to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens relative to non-anthracycline regimens that is similar to that seen in patients with HER2 amplification.



CONTEXT AND CAVEATS

Prior knowledge

In Mammary 5 (MA.5) and other randomized breast cancer trials, women with amplification or overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) were reported to benefit more from adjuvant therapies that included anthracyclines than from therapies without them. Because HER2 lies near the gene for topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A), it was hypothesized that responsiveness to anthracyclines might be associated with TOP2A gene alterations.

Study design

Tissue microarrays were able to be constructed from 438 of 710 tumor blocks accrued in 1989–1993 from MA.5 patients. TOP2A and HER2 amplification were measured by fluorescence in situ hybridization on the arrays. The association of each with recurrence-free survival and with overall survival was statistically tested.

Contribution

Patients whose tumors had alterations (either amplification or deletion) of TOP2A had statistically significantly longer overall survival and recurrence-free survival in response to chemotherapy with epirubicin than to chemotherapy without this anthracycline, whereas patients without TOP2A alterations showed no difference in responsiveness.

Implications

TOP2A alteration (amplification or deletion) is associated with a degree of responsiveness to anthracyclines that is similar to that observed in patients with HER2 amplification.

Limitations

There is close but not complete concordance between TOP2A alteration and HER2 amplification. A larger number of patients will be needed to determine which measurement is most closely associated with responsiveness to anthracycline-containing regimens.

From the Editors

 
Manuscript received December 27, 2008; revised February 2, 2009; accepted February 27, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Articles in JNCI

IN THIS ISSUE
J Natl Cancer Inst 2009 101: 613. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Gene Alterations Are Associated with Better Response to Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst 2009 101: 613. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. Oakman, E. Moretti, C. Sotiriou, G. Viale, and A. Di Leo
Re: Topoisomerase II Alpha and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant Chemotherapy
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 5, 2009; (2009) djp402v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. I. Pritchard, F. O'malley, L. Shepherd, M. N. Levine, D. Tu, V. Bramwell, I. Andrulis, and S. Chia
Response
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 5, 2009; (2009) djp403v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
K. I. Pritchard
Are HER2 and TOP2A Useful As Prognostic or Predictive Biomarkers for Anthracycline-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer?
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2009; 27(24): 3875 - 3876.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Oncology and HematologyHome page
Are Anthracyclines Justified for Breast Cancer?
Journal Watch Oncology and Hematology, June 2, 2009; 2009(602): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. J. Slamon and M. F. Press
Alterations in the TOP2A and HER2 Genes: Association With Adjuvant Anthracycline Sensitivity in Human Breast Cancers
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 6, 2009; 101(9): 615 - 618.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.