Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on June 17, 2009
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2009 101(13):966-967; doi:10.1093/jnci/djp128
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/13/966    most recent
djp128v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Djulbegovic, B.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Djulbegovic, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press.

CORRESPONDENCE

Response: Re: Tandem vs Single Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ambuj Kumar, Benjamin Djulbegovic

Affiliation of authors: Moffitt Cancer Center and University of South Florida, Clinical Translational Science Institute, Center for Evidence-based Medicine and Health Outcome Research, Tampa, FL)

Correspondence to: Ambuj Kumar, MD, MPH, Moffitt Cancer Center, Oncologic Sciences, Health Outcomes and Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr, MRC 232A, Tampa, FL 33612 (e-mail: ambuj.kumar@moffitt.org).

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

We thank Drs Tricot and Giralt and their colleagues for their comments related to our systematic review and meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness of single and tandem autologous hematopoietic transplantation in multiple myeloma patients. The concerns of both letters relate primarily to the inclusion criteria for the studies upon which our systematic review is based. The authors suggest that studies published as abstracts or unpublished studies that did . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?