Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on November 11, 2008
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 100(22):1654-1655; doi:10.1093/jnci/djn369
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/22/1654-a    most recent
djn369v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Goldie, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Goldie, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press.

CORRESPONDENCE

Response

Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, Sue Goldie

Affiliations of authors: Department of Medicine, Center for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (JDG-F); Department of Health Policy and Management, Program in Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (SG)

Correspondence to: Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, PhD, Department of Medicine, Center for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, 117 Encina Commons, Stanford, CA 94305 (e-mail: jeremygf@stanford.edu).

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Our recently published decision-analytic study (1) that compared alternative cervical cancer prevention strategies was intended to provide policy makers with estimates of long-term impacts needed for near-term decision making. Although it used the best data available at the time, a necessary part of a model-based approach is the iterative reassessment of internal consistency and face validity.

Rossi . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?