Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on June 10, 2008
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 100(12):829; doi:10.1093/jnci/djn221
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/12/829-b    most recent
djn221v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles in JNCI
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2008.

MEMO TO THE MEDIA

Mammography Facility Characteristics Associated with Accuracy of Screening

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Some characteristics of mammography facilities are associated with the accuracy of interpretation of screening mammograms, according to a study published online June 10 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Previous studies have suggested that patient characteristics, such as age, are associated with . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Contact:

Citation:


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Articles in JNCI

Mammography Facility Characteristics Associated With Interpretive Accuracy of Screening Mammography
Stephen Taplin, Linn Abraham, William E. Barlow, Joshua J. Fenton, Eric A. Berns, Patricia A. Carney, Gary R. Cutter, Edward A. Sickles, D'Orsi Carl, and Joann G. Elmore
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 876-887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Mammography Facility Characteristics Associated with Accuracy of Screening
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 829. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]