Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on May 27, 2008
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008 100(11):826-827; doi:10.1093/jnci/djn041
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/11/826-a    most recent
djn041v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garland, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Garland, F. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garland, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Garland, F. C.
Related Collections
Right arrowResponse to this Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press.

CORRESPONDENCE

Re: Prospective Study of Vitamin D and Cancer Mortality in the United States

Cedric F. Garland, Edward D. Gorham, Carole A. Baggerly, Frank C. Garland

Affiliations of authors: Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA (CFG, EDG, FCG); GrassrootsHealth, Encinitas, CA (CAB)

Correspondence to: Cedric F. Garland, DrPH, FACE, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, 0631, La Jolla, CA 92093 (e-mail: cgarland@ucsd.edu).

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Scientists vary in their approaches to interpreting data. Still, we are concerned that Freedman et al. (1) rejected evidence of a substantial protective association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) on mortality rates from breast cancer due to incorrect use of a statistical procedure.

The mortality rate from breast cancer was statistically significantly lower in women . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Response to this Correspondence

Response: Re: Prospective Study of Vitamin D and Cancer Mortality in the United States
D. Michal Freedman, Anne C. Looker, Shih-Chen Chang, and Barry I. Graubard
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 100: 827-828. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]