Skip Navigation


Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access originally published online on September 25, 2007
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2007 99(19):1490; doi:10.1093/jnci/djm137
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/19/1490    most recent
djm137v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hubner, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Houlston, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hubner, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Houlston, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in JNCI
Right arrowResponse to this Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2007.

CORRESPONDENCE

Re: MLH1 –93G>A Promoter Polymorphism and the Risk of Microsatellite-Unstable Colorectal Cancer

Richard A. Hubner, Richard S. Houlston

Affiliations of authors: Section of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK

Correspondence to: Richard A. Hubner, MA, BM, BCh, Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Cancer Genetics, 15 Cotswold Rd, Sutton, SM2 5NG, UK. (e-mail: richard.hubner{at}icr.ac.uk).

Raptis et al. (1) propose an association between the MLH1 –93G>A polymorphism and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) status and suggest that this variant is a low-penetrance allele for colorectal cancer susceptibility. Although it is plausible that, in addition to highly penetrant truncating mutations, common variants of DNA mismatch repair genes such as MLH1 may contribute to colorectal cancer susceptibility, demonstrating causality is not straightforward.

In the study of Raptis et al. (1), case patients with colorectal cancer were ascertained from the Ontario and Newfoundland Familial Colorectal Cancer Registries. Patients captured by these registries have previously been demonstrated to be enriched for familial colorectal cancer (2). A recent study (3) of familial colorectal cancer has shown that pathogenic germline MLH1 mutations can be identified in approximately 50% of MSI-H tumor-carrying families that fulfill the Amsterdam criteria and in approximately 30% of MSI-H tumor-carrying families that do not fulfill those criteria. On this basis, it is possible that a high proportion of case patients with MSI-H colorectal cancer in the study by Raptis et al. (1) might be carriers of germline MLH1 mutations. If this is the case, then linkage disequilibrium between such mutations and the –93A allele is a potential confounder. Such linkage disequilibrium has already been demonstrated for the MLH1 IVS14-19A>G polymorphism (4), and it is entirely plausible that other polymorphisms may similarly be over- or underrepresented in mutation carriers. In this regard, it is interesting to note that the same group recently reported that the –42C>T sequence change in the MLH1 promoter, which is only 51 bases from the –93G>A variant, cosegregates with colorectal cancer in a Newfoundland kindred (5). Although 929 and 430 case patients were initially recruited from the two different registries, information on MSI status was unavailable for 163 (18%) and 136 (32%), respectively, raising the possibility of selection bias, and the analyses of case patients with MSI-H tumors were based on only 117 and 33 case patients, respectively.

However attractive the hypothesis that polymorphisms in MLH1 confer susceptibility to colorectal cancer may be, validation of the association reported by Raptis et al. (1) is required in multiple independent outbred populations that are analogous to those stipulated for large-scale genome-wide studies (6) before it can be unambiguously asserted that –93G>A is a low-penetrance susceptibility allele.

REFERENCES

(1) Raptis S, Mrkonjic M, Green RC, Pethe VV, Monga N, Chan YM, et al. MLH1 –93G>A promoter polymorphism and the risk of microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 99:463–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

(2) Green RC, Green JS, Buehler SK, Robb JD, Daftary D, Gallinger S, et al. Very high incidence of familial colorectal cancer in Newfoundland: a comparison with Ontario and 13 other population-based studies. Fam Cancer (2007) 6:53–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

(3) Lagerstedt Robinson K, Liu T, Vandrovcova J, Halvarsson B, Clendenning M, Frebourg T, et al. Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) diagnostics. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 99:291–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

(4) Hutter P, Wijnen J, Rey-Berthod C, Thiffault I, Verkuijlen P, Farber D, et al. An MLH1 haplotype is over-represented on chromosomes carrying an HNPCC predisposing mutation in MLH1. J Med Genet (2002) 39:323–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

(5) Green RC, Green AG, Simms M, Pater A, Robb JD, Green JS. Germline hMLH1 promoter mutation in a Newfoundland HNPCC kindred. Clin Genet (2003) 64:220–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

(6) Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ. Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat Rev Genet (2005) 6:95–108.[Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related Article in JNCI

MLH1 –93G>A Promoter Polymorphism and the Risk of Microsatellite-Unstable Colorectal Cancer
Stavroula Raptis, Miralem Mrkonjic, Roger C. Green, Vaijayanti V. Pethe, Neerav Monga, Yuen Man Chan, Darshana Daftary, Elizabeth Dicks, Banfield H. Younghusband, Patrick S. Parfrey, Steven S. Gallinger, John R. McLaughlin, Julia A. Knight, and Bharati Bapat
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 463-474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Response to this Correspondence

Response: Re: MLH1 –93G>A Promoter Polymorphism and the Risk of Microsatellite-Unstable Colorectal Cancer
Stavroula Raptis, Miralem Mrkonjic, Roger C. Green, Darshana Daftary, Vaijayanti Pethe, Elizabeth Dicks, Banfield H. Younghusband, Patrick S. Parfrey, Steven S. Gallinger, John R. McLaughlin, Julia A. Knight, and Bharati Bapat
J Natl Cancer Inst 2007 99: 1490-1491. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/19/1490    most recent
djm137v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hubner, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Houlston, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hubner, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Houlston, R. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article in JNCI
Right arrowResponse to this Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?