Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(5):364; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj076
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foro, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sanz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foro, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sanz, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowResponse to this Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.

CORRESPONDENCE

Re: Randomized Trial of Short- Versus Long-Course Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases

Palmira Foro, Manuel Algara, Nuria Rodriguez, Javier Sanz

Affiliation of authors: Institut d'Oncologia Radioteràpica, IMAS, Sant Josep de la Montanya 12, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence to: Palmira Foro, PhD, Institut d'Oncologia Radioteràpica, Sant Josep de la Montanya 12, 08024 Barcelona, Spain (e-mail: pforo{at}imas.imim.es).

The role of radiotherapy in the palliation of painful symptomatic bone metastases is well established. Recently, it has been reported that single-fraction radiotherapy is as effective as multifraction radiotherapy (1,2), which is the most widely used regimen. We read the interest the article by Hartsell et al. (3), which compared the ability of a single 8-Gy fraction of radiation therapy with that of 30 Gy delivered in 10 treatment fractions to palliate pain from bone metastasis. We conducted a similar trial in our hospital from July 15, 1999, to December 31, 2001, in which we enrolled a total of 160 patients and randomly assigned them to receive either a single fraction of 8 Gy of radiation therapy or 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The pain intensity was measured on a patient-assessed ordinal pain scale of 0–10. A partial response was defined as a pain reduction of two points or more on this scale, without the increased use of analgesic drugs. A complete response was defined as a pain score of zero at the treated area without increased use of analgesic drugs. Patient follow-up was at 3, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks after the onset of treatment.

The two groups did not differ with respect to age, sex, primary tumor type, localization of metastases, or analgesic drug consumption. There were no differences in survival rates between the two arms. The overall response rates were 75.5% in the 8-Gy arm and 86.6% in the 30-Gy arm (difference = 11.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = –2.4% to 24.2%). Complete response rates were 15.4% in the 8-Gy arm and 13.4% in the 30-Gy arm (difference = 2.0%, 95% CI = –14.1% to 10.2 %). None of these differences were statistically significant.

Our acute toxicity outcomes were similar to those reported by Hartsell et al. Toxicity was higher in our 30-Gy arm (18.2%) than in our 8-Gy arm (12.7%), but these differences were not statistically significant (difference = 5.5%, 95% CI = –7.0% to 17.9%). In addition, as in Hartsell et al., the retreatment rate in our trial was statistically significantly higher in the 8-Gy arm than in the 30-Gy arm (28.2% versus 2.4%) (difference = 25.8%, 95% CI = –37.5% to –14.0%) (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.  Overall rates of partial and complete response, toxicity, and retreatment

 
Hartsell et al. reported that one of the main limitations of their study was the trial included only patients with metastases from breast or prostate cancer. We enrolled all the patients with a life expectancy of longer than 1 month, regardless of the location of their metastases or their primary cancer. We did not find statistically significant differences between treatment arms, except for patients with lung cancer metastases. In these patients, the response was statistically significantly higher in the 30-Gy arm than in the 8-Gy arm for the crude response rates (90.9% versus 57.9%) (difference = 33%, 95% CI = 2.9% to 63.2%), but these differences disappeared in the actuarial rate of response.

We concluded that the regimen of a single fraction of 8 Gy was as safe and effective as a multifraction regimen for the palliation of painful bone metastases. The 8-Gy single fraction was the treatment of choice for most of the patients, except for patients with the lung cancer metastases, for whom additional studies are required.

REFERENCES

(1) Wu JS, Wong R, Johnston M, Bezjak A, Whelan T. Meta-analysis of dose-fractionation radiotherapy trials for the palliation of painful bone metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;55:594–605.[CrossRef][Medline]

(2) Sze WM, Shelley MD, Held I, Wilt TJ, Mason MD. Palliation of metastatic bone pain: single fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy—a systematic review of randomised trials. Clin Oncol 2003;15:345–52.[CrossRef]

(3) Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, Scarantino CW, Ivker RA, Roach M, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:798–804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Response to this Correspondence

RESPONSE: Re: Randomized Trial of Short- Versus Long-Course Radiotherapy for Palliation of Painful Bone Metastases
William F. Hartsell, Michelle DeSilvio, Deborah Watkins Bruner, and Andre Konski
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006 98: 365. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foro, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sanz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foro, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sanz, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowResponse to this Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?