© 2005 Oxford University Press
ARTICLE |
Clinical and Biological Features Associated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations in Lung Cancers
Affiliations of authors: Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research (HS, TT, MN, JDM, AFG), Department of Molecular Genetics (JH), Department of Internal Medicine (JDM), Department of Pharmacology (JDM) and Department of Pathology (AFG), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Cancer Prevention Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (LL, ZF); Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan (MS, TF); Department of Pathology (IIW) and Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (JAR), University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia (KMF); Institute of Medical and Molecular Toxicology, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan (HL); Department of Cancer and Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine and Dentistry, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan (HS, ST, NS)
Correspondence to: Adi F. Gazdar, MD, Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8593 (e-mail: adi.gazdar{at}utsouthwestern.edu).
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Background: Mutations in the tyrosine kinase (TK) domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in lung cancers are associated with increased sensitivity of these cancers to drugs that inhibit EGFR kinase activity. However, the role of such mutations in the pathogenesis of lung cancers is unclear. Methods: We sequenced exons 1821 of the EGFR TK domain from genomic DNA isolated from 617 non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and 524 normal lung tissue samples from the same patients and 36 neuroendocrine lung tumors collected from patients in Japan, Taiwan, the United States, and Australia and from 243 other epithelial cancers. Mutation status was compared with clinicopathologic features and with the presence of mutations in KRAS, a gene in the EGFR signaling pathway that is also frequently mutated in lung cancers. All statistical tests were two sided. Results: We detected a total of 134 EGFR TK domain mutations in 130 (21%) of the 617 NSCLCs but not in any of the other carcinomas, nor in nonmalignant lung tissue from the same patients. In NSCLC patients, EGFR TK domain mutations were statistically significantly more frequent in never smokers than ever smokers (51% versus 10%), in adenocarcinomas versus cancer of other histologies (40% versus 3%), in patients of East Asian ethnicity versus other ethnicities (30% versus 8%), and in females versus males (42% versus 14%; all P < .001). EGFR TK domain mutation status was not associated with patient age at diagnosis, clinical stage, the presence of bronchioloalveolar histologic features, or overall survival. The EGFR TK domain mutations we detected were of three common types: in-frame deletions in exon 19, single missense mutations in exon 21, and in-frame duplications/insertions in exon 20. Rare missense mutations were also detected in exons 18, 20, and 21. KRAS gene mutations were present in 50 (8%) of the 617 NSCLCs but not in any tumors with an EGFR TK domain mutation. Conclusions: Mutations in either the EGFR TK domain or the KRAS gene can lead to lung cancer pathogenesis. EGFR TK domain mutations are the first molecular change known to occur specifically in never smokers.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, lung cancer is the major cause of cancer-related deaths (1,2). Nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the major form of lung cancer, is classified into three histologic types: adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma. Adenocarcinoma is the most frequent histologic type of NSCLC in both sexes in many parts of the world. Although tobacco smoking is the cause of most lung cancers, it is less strongly associated with adenocarcinoma than with other histologic types (3). Lung cancer is also characterized by the accumulation of multiple genetic and/or epigenetic alterations, including those that result in the activation of oncogenes and the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (46). A better understanding of the molecular mechanism by which these alterations affect lung cancer pathogenesis would provide new and more effective strategies for chemoprevention, early diagnosis, and targeted treatment (7).
Deregulation of protein kinase activity is common in malignancies (8,9) and has led to the development of therapies that target these oncogenes (10). One such therapy, which has been widely used for the treatment of NSCLC, is gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839), a small-molecule tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor that inhibits the protein kinase activity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is highly expressed in many epithelial cancers, including lung cancers (11). Although results of several preclinical studies and clinical trials have reported mixed results (1215), the mechanisms of the antitumor effect and drug sensitivity of TK inhibitors have not been fully established because neither the expression nor the phosphorylation status of EGFR was associated with patient response (16). Nonetheless, some patients have dramatic and durable responses to such therapy.
Reports of lung cancers bearing mutations in the EGFR gene have generated considerable interest because such mutations are associated with an increased sensitivity to gefitinib therapy (1719). All of the mutations detected are located within the TK domain of the EGFR gene, where gefitinib competes with adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for binding to the protein; cells containing these mutations are responsive to the principal ligand (i.e., EGF) and show increased sensitivity to gefitinib in vitro (17). The TK domain EGFR mutations are more frequently found in NSCLCs with adenocarcinoma histology than in those with other histologies, in females than in males, in patients from Japan than in patients from the United States, and in never smokers than in current or former smokers (1719), the same subpopulations that have the highest response rates to gefitinib (14,15,20,21).
To examine the role of EGFR TK domain mutations in lung cancer pathogenesis, we searched for EGFR TK domain mutations in genomic DNA isolated from primary lung tumors from Japan, Taiwan, the United States, and Australia. Our goal was to examine the associations between EGFR TK domain mutation status and patient sex, age at diagnosis, tumor histology, clinical stage, smoking history, and ethnicity. We also examined EGFR TK domain mutations in genomic DNA from nonmalignant lung tissue from many of the patients and from other epithelial cancer samples. EGFR signaling influences multiple downstream pathways, including Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase, JAK-STAT cytokine, and phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathways, which affect cell proliferation, survival, and apo-ptosis. Several genes in the RAS, RAF, and phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase families have been found to be mutated in lung cancer, with KRAS gene mutations (especially in codons 12 and 13) especially frequent (8,9,22). DNA sequences of human papillomavirus (HPV) strains 16 and 18 have been reported to be associated with lung cancers from Taiwan and are associated with the female sex and never smoking status (23). Thus, we also examined the relationship between EGFR gene mutation status and KRAS gene mutation status or the presence of HPV DNA sequences.
| PATIENTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tumor Samples
We obtained 617 NSCLC tumors from patients undergoing surgical resection at Chiba University and Okayama University (Chiba and Okayama, Japan, respectively; n = 263), Veterans General Hospital (Taichung, Taiwan; n = 93), MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX; n = 160), and Prince Charles Hospital (Brisbane, Australia; n = 101). Tumors were collected at the time of surgical resection and kept frozen at 80°C. All patients from Japan and Taiwan were of East Asian ethnicity. Among patients from the United States, 139 were white, eight were Hispanic, seven were black, and four were East Asian; ethnicity was not known for two patients. One of the Australian patients was East Asian; the rest were white. For the 524 patients from Japan, the United States, and Australia, we also obtained a sample of the corresponding nonmalignant lung tissue from a site located far from the tumor. Most of the tumors were unselected (i.e., collected sequentially; n = 519); the remaining tumors were selected from among patients with well-documented smoking histories from the United States (n = 80) and Australia (n = 18). Six primary small-cell lung cancers (SCLCs) were obtained from patients undergoing treatment at Chiba University, and 25 bronchial carcinoids and 5 large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) were obtained from patients undergoing treatment at MD Anderson Cancer Center. A total of 243 epithelial carcinomas arising at sites other than the lung were obtained from patients undergoing treatment at the hospitals affiliated with University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (prostate, bladder, breast, and colorectal cancer) or from Catholic University, Santiago, Chile (gallbladder cancer).
Institutional Review Board permission and patient written informed consent were obtained at each collection site. Clinical information, including patient sex, age at diagnosis, tumor histology, clinical stage, and smoking history, were available for all patients, and valid survival data were available for 436 patients (182 from Japan, 159 from the United States, and 95 from Australia). Clinical staging of lung cancers was performed using the revised International System for Staging Lung Cancer (24). All available pathology slides of adenocarcinomas from the U.S. NSCLCs (n = 97) were reviewed and reevaluated for bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) subtypes according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lung cancers (which defines BAC as a true noninvasive cancer without stromal, vascular, or pleural invasion) (25). The slides were also scored for the presence of lepidic growth (a feature of BAC) in increments of 10% (with 100% representing pure, or true, BAC tumors). The Taiwanese patients had been previously examined for the presence of HPV types 16 and 18 DNA (23).
DNA Extraction and Sequencing
Genomic DNA was isolated from primary tumor samples by overnight digestion with sodium dodecyl sulfate and proteinase K (Life Technologies Inc., Rockville, MD) at 37°C, followed by standard phenol-chloroform (1 volume:1 volume) extraction and ethanol precipitation.
Intron-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers were used to amplify the seven exons comprising the entire TK domain of the EGFR gene. The primers were as follows (forward and reverse, respectively): exon 18 (5'-AGCATGGTGAGGGCTGAGGTGAC-3' and 5'-ATATACAGCTTGCAAGGACTCTGG-3'), exon 19 (5'-CCAGATCACTGGGCAGCATGTGGCACC-3' and 5'-AGCAGGGTCTAGAGCAGAGCAGCTGCC-3'), exon 20 (5'-GATCGCATTCATGCGTCTTCACC-3' and 5'-TTGCTATCCCAGGAGCGCAGACC-3'), exon 21 (5'-TCAGAGCCTGGCATGAACATGACCCTG-3' and 5'-GGTCCCTGGTGTCAGGAAAATGCTGG-3'), exon 22 (5'-AATTAGGTCCAGAGTGAGTTAAC-3' and 5'-ACTTGCATGTCAGAGGATATAATG-3'), exon 23 (5'-CATCAAGAAACAGTAACCAGTAATG-3' and 5'-AAGGCCTCAGCTGTTTGGCTAAG-3'), and exon 24 (5'-TTGACTGGAAGTGTCGCATCACC-3' and 5'-CATGTGACAGAACACAGTGACATG-3'). All PCR assays were carried out in a 25-µL volume that contained 100 ng of genomic DNA and 1.25 units of HotStarTaq DNA polymerase (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA). DNA was amplified for 33 cycles at 95°C for 30 seconds, 65°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 45 seconds, followed by a 7-minute extension at 72°C. The sequences of the intron-based PCR primers for used to amplify exon 2 of the KRAS gene were as follows (forward and reverse, respectively): 5'-GTATTAACCTTATGTGTGACA-3' and 5'-GTCCTGCACCAGTAATATGC-3'. DNA was amplified for 33 cycles at 95°C for 30 seconds, 55°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds, followed by a 7-minute extension at 72°C. All PCR products were incubated with exonuclease I and shrimp alkaline phosphatase (Amersham Biosciences Corp., Piscataway, NJ) according to the manufacturer's instructions and then sequenced directly using the Applied Biosystems PRISM dye terminator cycle sequencing method (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Foster City, CA). All sequence variants were confirmed by sequencing the products of independent PCR amplifications in both directions.
Statistical Analyses
We used chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests (when there were fewer than five expected counts in the contingency table) to assess the relationship between EGFR gene mutations and each of the potentially influential factors, including ethnicity, sex, smoking status, and histologic subtype. We used logistic regression models, with EGFR gene mutation status as the outcome, to examine the effects of ethnicity, sex, smoking status, and histologic subtype, with adjustment for each factor. Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn for the two groups of patients (i.e., those with and without the mutations), and the difference in overall survival between the two groups was investigated by using a Cox proportional hazards model with adjustment for other survival-related risk factors, age, ethnicity, and histological subtype, given the mutation groups were time independent. The agreement between EGFR and KRAS gene mutation status was tested, and the kappa coefficient was determined. The agreement between mutation status for each of the four studied exons of the TK domain and ethnicity, sex, smoking status, and histologic type was tested among unselected patients with EGFR mutations. All statistical tests were two sided, and P values less than .05 were considered statistically significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preliminary sequence analysis of the entire TK domain (exons 1824) of the EGFR gene of 96 unselected NSCLC samples indicated that all mutations were located within exons 1821, which encode the N lobe and part of the C lobe of EGFR (Fig. 1). Our subsequent analyses were limited to these four exons. We detected mutations only in DNA extracted from NSCLC samples; no mutations were detected in DNA extracted from neuroendocrine lung tumors (SCLCs, LCNECs, and bronchial carcinoids) or prostate, bladder, breast, colorectal, or gallbladder carcinomas. EGFR TK domain mutations were detected in 130 (21%) of the 617 NSCLCs and in 120 (23%) of the 519 unselected NSCLCs (Table 1). Of the 120 unselected tumors with EGFR TK domain mutations, two had multiple mutations (see below). The frequency of mutations was greater for patients of East Asian ethnicity versus those of other ethnicities (30% versus 8%, P < .001), females versus males (42% versus 14%, P < .001), never smokers versus ever smokers (51% versus 10%, P < .001), and for adenocarcinomas versus other histologies (40% versus 3%, P < .001).
|
|
Among the adenocarcinoma patients from the United States or Australia, four (80%) of five patients of East Asian ethnicity had an EGFR TK domain mutation, whereas only 12 (16%) of 75 patients of other ethnicities (mainly white) had an EGFR TK domain mutation (P = .005). Of the four EGFR TK domain mutation-positive adenocarcinomas in patients of East Asian ethnicity, three were from males and two were from never smokers. Logistic regression models confirmed that age and EGFR TK domain mutation status were independent. Because the distribution of age at diagnosis was not statistically significant different between patients with and without EGFR TK domain mutations, we did not adjust for age in the logistic regression analyses. We examined associations between the variables after adjustment for each other, with EGFR TK domain mutation status as the outcome and all the factors as explanatory variables, and found no interactions.
Even when we confined our analysis to the subgroup with the highest frequencies of mutations, never smokers with adenocarcinomas (both selected and unselected cases combined, n = 157), the EGFR TK domain mutation frequency was statistically significantly higher for patients from Japan and Taiwan than for those from the United States and Australia (64% versus 36%), both before and after adjustment for sex (P = .003 and .004, respectively). For the 160 patients from the United States for whom we had detailed smoking data, 3% of current smokers, 8% of former smokers, and 20% of never smokers had EGFR TK domain mutations. Results of a test for trend revealed that smoking status was statistically significantly associated with the presence of EGFR gene mutations (adjusted Ptrend = .02). There were no statistically significant differences in mutational patterns with respect to sex, smoking status, or ethnicity.
Overall, we identified a total 134 EGFR TK domain mutations among 130 tumors. In 95 of the 130 patients for whom adjacent nonmalignant lung tissue was available, mutations were absent from the nonmalignant tissue, indicating that the mutations were somatic in origin. The mutations consisted of three different typesin-frame deletions, single-nucleotide substitutions, and in-frame duplications/insertionsand all mutations were located within or near functionally important sites in the receptor (Table 2; Fig. 1). In-frame deletions in exon 19 (11 types, labeled
1
11), involving three to seven codons centered around the uniformly deleted codons 747 to 749 (Leu-Arg-Glu sequence), accounted for 62 (46%) of the mutations detected. The in-frame deletions were occasionally accompanied by missense mutations at the carboxyl-terminal amino acid position flanking thedeletion. Missense mutations (n = 60, 45% of total mutations) in exons 18, 20, or 21 (nine types, labeled M1M9) were the second-most-common mutation, especially mutation L858R (M1) in exon 21 (n = 52, 39% of total mutations). In-frame duplications and/or insertions of one to three codons in exon 20 (eight types, labeled D1D8), involving amino acids 770 to 776, accounted for 12 (9%) of the mutations. We also detected one silentmutation in exon 18 at codon 718. Three tumors had multiple mutations (one tumor had two mutations, and two tumors had three mutations each); each of the remaining tumors had a single mutation.
|
It has been reported that EGFR TK domain mutations are common among adenocarcinomas of the BAC subtype (17,19). Therefore, two pathologists (I.I.W. and A.F.G.) who are familiar with the WHO classification of lung cancers (25) reviewed the pathology slides for 97 adenocarcinomas from the United States. Seven of these adenocarcinomas (7%) were pure BAC tumors, and none of them had EGFR TK domain mutations. Seventeen adenocarcinomas (18%) were classified as having any BAC features (including those classified as pure BAC tumors). BAC features were present in four (27%) of 15 adenocarcinomas with EGFR TK domain mutations and in 13 (16%) of 82 adenocarcinomas without EGFR TK domain mutations (Table 3). There were no statistically significant differences between EGFR TK domain mutation frequencies and the presence or percentage of BAC features (P = .29).
|
We examined the sequence electropherograms for clues about the relative ratios of the mutant and wild-type alleles in individual tumors. We focused on the electropherograms of tumors that had in-frame deletions or duplications/insertions because their interpretation was facilitated by the fact that the entire sequence downstream of those mutations differed from that of the wild-type allele. Tumor specimens invariably contain a considerable percentage of nonmalignant cells; we therefore interpreted electropherograms in which the peaks corresponding to the mutant sequence were equal to or greater than those of the corresponding wild-type sequence as indicating gene amplification of the mutant allele. Using these criteria, we found that approximately 40% of the electropherograms suggested gene amplification of the mutant allele (Fig. 2).
|
Because KRAS gene mutations in lung cancers are, like EGFR TK domain gene mutations, limited almost exclusively to adenocarcinomas (22), we also analyzed the adenocarcinomas for mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS gene (the codons mutated in the majority of lung cancers). We found that KRAS gene mutations were present in 50 (8%) of the 617 NSCLCs and were more frequently found in adenocarcinomas than in other histologic types (12% versus 2%; P < .001), in ever smokers than in never smokers (10% versus 4%; P =.01), and in patients from the United States and Australia than in patients from Japan and Taiwan (12% versus 5%; P = .001). There was no statistically significant association between the frequency of KRAS gene mutations and sex (7% in males versus 10% in females; P = .4). None of the tumors we examined had mutations in both the EGFR TK domain and the KRAS gene.
Among the unselected (i.e., sequentially collected) adenocarcinoma patients, the EGFR TK domain mutation rates were similar for early-stage disease (i.e., stages I and II; 80 [38%] of 208 cases were mutation positive) and advanced disease (i.e., stages III and IV; 34 [44%] of 78 were mutation positive) (P = .5). After we adjusted for other factors, including age at diagnosis, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients whose tumors did and did not have EGFR TK domain mutations (P = .5, Wald's chi-square test, Cox proportional hazards model; Fig. 3). We also analyzed survival data for patients whose tumors had either of the two most common EGFR TK domain mutations (the L858R missense mutation in exon 21 and an in-frame deletion in exon 19). Compared with patients with no EGFR TK domain mutations, those with deletions in exon 19 had worse survival and those with the L858R mutation had better survival, but in neither case was the difference statistically significant.
|
Of the 93 Taiwanese patients, 58 had been previously tested for the presence of high-risk strains 16 and 18 of HPV (23). Among the tested patients, 32 had tumors (55%) that tested positive for HPV DNA, and as previously reported (23), 75% of the HPV DNA-positive tumors were from females and 67% were from never smokers. We found that 12 of the 58 patients with known HPV DNA status had an EGFR TK domain mutation. The concordance between the two groups (i.e., both molecular changes present versus neither present) was 53% (chi-square test; P = .42).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A detailed study of mutation patterns within the EGFR gene and their associations with clinicopathologic features of lung cancers is essential because preliminary data have suggested that lung cancer patients whose tumors have EGFR TK domain mutations respond better than those without such mutations to drugs that target the TK domain of the gene (1719). We tested a large number of primary lung and other cancers for EGFR TK domain mutations and explored the relationship between EGFR TK domain mutation status and multiple parameters associated with lung carcinogenesis, including KRAS gene mutation status and the presence of HPV DNA. We detected EGFR TK domain mutations only in lung cancers of the NSCLC type and not in neuroendocrine lung tumors or in cancers (mainly adenocarcinomas) arising at other sites, including those of breast, colorectal, and prostate origins. Preliminary examination of a subset of the tumors indicated that mutations were limited to the first four exons (exons 1821) of the TK domain. Three types of mutations constituted 94% of the mutations that we detected: deletions in exon 19, duplications and/or insertions in exon 20, and a single-point mutation in exon 21. The remaining 6% of the mutations we detected consisted of rare missense mutations, mainly in exon 18 but also in exons 20 and 21.
We identified 28 distinct mutations and classified them according to type. The three different mutation typesin-frame deletions, single-nucleotide substitutions, and in-frame duplications and/or insertionsall targeted structures around the ATP-binding cleft of EGFR (which is also the docking site of the small-molecule EGFR kinase inhibitors) (26), including the phosphate-binding loop (P-loop), the
C-helix, and the activation loop (A-loop). The L858R (M1) single-nucleotide substitution mutation, which is located near the conserved Asp-Phe-Gly sequence, stabilizes the A-loop (27). The other two common mutation types were located on either side of the
C-helix in the N lobe (Fig. 1), which controls the angle of the ATP-binding pocket. We hypothesize that mutations on either side of the
C-helix (deletions in exon 19 and duplications and/or insertions in exon 20) result in similar conformational changes in EGFR that cause a shift in the helical axis that results in the narrowing of the ATP-binding cleft, which leads to increased gene expression and TK inhibitor sensitivity (28). At least two of the common mutation types (deletions in exon 19 and the L858R missense mutation) are associated with an increase in the amount and duration of ligand-dependent activation, which explains the much greater sensitivity of cells bearing these mutations to EGFR kinase inhibitors (17). Most of the rare mutations target the P-loop. It is interesting that the major mutations always occurred as single mutations in individual tumors, whereas in individual tumors, the rare mutations usually occurred as multiple mutations. These results suggest that the tumorigenic effects of the minor mutations may not be as powerful as those of the major mutations. Additional investigations are required to elucidate the relationships among each type of mutation, TK inhibitor sensitivity, and tumorigenesis.
Our examination of the electropherograms revealed that EGFR TK domain mutations often occurred in a setting of allelic imbalance in which the mutant allele was in excess of the wild-type allele. Polysomy or amplification of the EGFR gene occurs in many cancers, including NSCLC, perhaps relatively early during multistage pathogenesis (29,30). Our findings suggest that specific mutations as well as the increased copy number of the mutant allele may play a role in lung cancer pathogenesis (and perhaps in the response to EGFR-targeted therapy).
Among the unselected patients, there were statistically significantly higher mutation frequencies for those with adenocarcinomas versus other histologies, for never smokers versus ever smokers, for patients from East Asian ethnicity versus other ethnicities, and for females versus males. Of the relatively few adenocarcinomas that arose in patients of East Asian ethnicity who were from United States or Australia, 80% had EGFR TK domain mutations, suggesting that ethnicity was associated with mutation rate, irrespective of geographic location. Results of multivariate analyses confirmed that these factors (i.e., sex, smoking status, ethnicity, and histologic subtype) were independent. Our results are consistent with those of previous reports (1719) and with findings associated with response to gefitinib (14,15). There was no relationship between EGFR TK domain mutation status and either clinical stage or patient survival (in the absence of EGFR kinase inhibitor therapy).
It has been reported that tumors with BAC features have better responses to gefitinib than tumors without such features (20). However, we found no association between EGFR gene mutation status and the BAC subtype of adenocarcinoma, which we defined according to the strict noninvasive criteria as stated by the WHO classification of lung tumors (25). Many pathologists do not use the strict WHO criteria; instead, they use terms such as "adenocarcinomas with BAC features" (which would be termed "adenocarcinomas with mixed subtypes" by the WHO classification) or "bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and its variants" (20). However, even when we applied such a liberal definition for the presence of BAC-like features mixed with other adenocarcinoma subtypes to the tumors in our study, there were no statistically significant differences between EGFR TK domain mutation frequencies and the presence or percentage of BAC features. Accurate assessment of BAC features requires examination of the entire tumor block because BAC features are more prominent at the edges of adenocarcinomas of mixed subtypes than elsewhere in the tumor. Thus, the limited tumor material typically assessed by reference pathologists for large multi-institutional studies could possibly lead to misleading classifications.
DNA sequences of the high-risk HPV types 16 and 18 have been detected in lung cancers from patients in Taiwan (23) and, less frequently, from patients in other parts of the world. In Taiwan, these HPV DNA sequences are more frequent in lung cancers that arise in female never smokers than in males or in ever smokers and those cancers are usually of the adenocarcinoma type. Thus, the distribution of HPV DNA sequences in lung cancers has similarities to the distribution of EGFR TK domain mutations. However, we found no relationship between the presence of high-risk HPV DNA sequences and EGFR TK domain mutations in our Taiwanese patients.
Both EGFR TK domain and KRAS gene mutations are relatively frequent in NSCLC, especially in adenocarcinomas (31). We found that KRAS gene mutations were more frequent in ever smokers than in never smokers and in patients from Western countries than in patients from East Asian countries. Although mutations in either the EFGR TK domain or the KRAS gene were present in 47% of lung adenocarcinomas, no tumors contained mutations in both genes. Mutant forms of EGFR protein activate multiple downstream signaling pathways, including the RAS, JAK-STAT, and Akt pathways (3234). Our findings suggest that activation of either the EGFR or RAS signaling pathways has similar effects on lung carcinogenesis.
Mutations in the TP53 gene are also relatively frequent in many cancer types, including lung cancers (35). Most KRAS and TP53 gene mutations in lung cancers are G-to-T transversions, molecular events that are believed to be linked to exposure to tobacco smoke carcinogens (3537). Lung cancers that arise in never smokers rarely have KRAS gene mutations, and their TP53 gene mutations are seldom G-to-T transversions (35,38), suggesting that these cancers arise in response to exposure to carcinogens other than those present in tobacco smoke.
Although we and others have identified at least 28 different mutations in the TK domain of EGFR, the vast majority of which can be grouped into three major types (Table 2), to date, only the L858R missense mutation in exon 21 and deletions in exon 19 have been proven to be activating mutations (32). Although the activating status of the third major type of mutation (duplications and/or insertions in exon 20) has not been determined, we presume that all mutations of the major types are activating because they always occurred singly, whereas the minor mutations may not be individually sufficient for activation because they often occurred as multiple mutations in individual tumors. However, this hypothesis will be tested in clinical and in vitro studies. In addition, it is possible that other factors such as gene amplification play a role in tumor pathogenesis and response to TK inhibitors.
The findings presented herein support the hypothesis (28) that at least two distinct molecular pathways are involved in the pathogenesis of lung adenocarcinomas, one involving EGFR TK domain mutations and the other involving KRAS gene mutations. The different mutational spectra of the KRAS, EGFR, and TP53 genes and the presence of HPV DNA in lung cancers arising in ever and never smokers suggest that exposure to carcinogens in environmental tobacco smoke may not be the major pathogenic factor involved in the origin of lung cancers in never smokers but that an as-yet-unidentified carcinogen(s) plays an important role. The fact that mutations in the TK domain of the EGFR gene are more frequent in lung cancers from patients of East Asian ethnicity than in patients of other ethnicities and have not been identified in other human carcinomas suggests that genetic susceptibility to the hypothetical carcinogen(s) may be greater in some subpopulations than in others. In summary, our findings suggest that mutations in the EGFR TK domain occur in a subset of lung adenocarcinomas, whereas KRAS gene mutations occur in a different subset. EGFR TK domain mutations are the first molecular change known to occur specifically in never smokers.
| NOTES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This work was supported by Specialized Program of Research Excellence in Lung Cancer grant P50CA70907 and grant 5U01CA8497102 from the Early Detection Research Network, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. J.D. Minna has an unrestricted research grant from Bristol Meyers Squibb and receives an honorarium for his work on the scientific advisory board of Eli Lilly.
We thank Margaret Spitz for obtaining some of the detailed smoke exposure histories.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(1) Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor A, Samuels A, Ward E, et al.; American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:829.
(2) Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, et al.; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;346:928.
(3) Patel JD, Bach PB, Kris MG. Lung cancer in US women: a contemporary epidemic. JAMA 2004;291:17638.
(4) Fong KM, Sekido Y, Minna JD. Molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:113652.
(5) Gazdar AF. The molecular and cellular basis of human lung cancer. Anticancer Res 1994;14:2617.[Web of Science][Medline]
(6) Sekido Y, Fong KM, Minna JD. Progress in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of human lung cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998;1378:F2159.[Medline]
(7) Minna JD, Gazdar AF, Sprang SR, Herz J. Cancer. A bull's eye for targeted lung cancer therapy. Science 2004;304:145861.
(8) Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 2002;417:94954.[CrossRef][Medline]
(9) Samuels Y, Wang Z, Bardelli A, Silliman N, Ptak J, Szabo S, et al. High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 2004;304:554.
(10) Noble ME, Endicott JA, Johnson LN. Protein kinase inhibitors: insights into drug design from structure. Science 2004;303:18005.
(11) Cohen MH, Williams GA, Sridhara R, Chen G, McGuinn WD Jr., Morse D, et al. United States Food and Drug Administration Drug Approval summary: Gefitinib (ZD1839; Iressa) tablets. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:12128.
(12) Wakeling AE, Guy SP, Woodburn JR, Ashton SE, Curry BJ, Barker AJ, Gibson KH. ZD1839 (Iressa): an orally active inhibitor of epidermal growth factor signaling with potential for cancer therapy. Cancer Res 2002;62:574954.
(13) Miller VA, Johnson DH, Krug LM, Pizzo B, Tyson L, Perez W, et al. Pilot trial of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2094100.
(14) Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G, Tamura T, Nakagawa K, Douillard JY, et al. Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial). J Clin Oncol 2003;21:223746.
(15) Kris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS, Lynch TJ Jr., Prager D, Belani CP, et al. Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003;290:214958.
(16) Suzuki T, Nakagawa T, Endo H, Mitsudomi T, Masuda A, Yatabe Y, et al. The sensitivity of lung cancer cell lines to the EGFR-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 (Iressa) is not related to the expression of EGFR or HER-2 or to K-ras gene status. Lung Cancer 2003;42:3541.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
(17) Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004;350:212939.
(18) Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004;304:1497500.
(19) Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, Doherty J, Politi K, Sarkaria I, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:1330611.
(20) Miller VA, Kris MG, Shah N, Patel J, Azzoli C, Gomez J, et al. Bronchioloalveolar pathologic subtype and smoking history predict sensitivity to gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:11039.
(21) Janne PA, Gurubhagavatula S, Yeap BY, Lucca J, Ostler P, Skarin AT, et al. Outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib (ZD1839, "Iressa") on an expanded access study. Lung Cancer 2004;44:22130.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
(22) Ahrendt SA, Decker PA, Alawi EA, Zhu YR, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Yang SC, et al. Cigarette smoking is strongly associated with mutation of the K-ras gene in patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the lung. Cancer 2001;92:152530.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
(23) Cheng YW, Chiou HL, Sheu GT, Hsieh LL, Chen JT, Chen CY, et al. The association of human papillomavirus 16/18 infection with lung cancer among nonsmoking Taiwanese women. Cancer Res 2001;61:2799803.
(24) Mountain CF. Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer. Chest 1997;111:17107.
(25) Travis WD, Colby TV, Corrin B, Shimosato Y, Brambilla E. Histological typing of lung and pleural tumours. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1999.
(26) Kim DW, Lu B, Hallahan DE. Receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors as anti-angiogenic agents. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2004;5:597604.[Medline]
(27) Huse M, Kuriyan J. The conformational plasticity of protein kinases. Cell 2002;109:27582.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
(28) Gazdar AF, Shigematsu H, Herz J, Minna JD. Mutations and addiction to EGFR: the Achilles heal of lung cancers? Trends Mol Med 2004;10:4816.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
(29) Hirsch FR, Franklin WA, Veve R, Varella-Garcia M, Bunn PA Jr. HER2/neu expression in malignant lung tumors. Semin Oncol 2002;29:518.[Web of Science][Medline]
(30) Hirsch FR, Scagliotti GV, Langer CJ, Varella-Garcia M, Franklin WA. Epidermal growth factor family of receptors in preneoplasia and lung cancer: perspectives for targeted therapies. Lung Cancer 2003;41:S2942.
(31) Slebos RJ, Hruban RH, Dalesio O, Mooi WJ, Offerhaus GJ, Rodenhuis S. Relationship between K-ras oncogene activation and smoking in adenocarcinoma of the human lung. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:10247.
(32) Sordella R, Bell DW, Haber DA, Settleman J. Gefitinib-sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung cancer activate anti-apoptotic pathways. Science 2004;305:11637.
(33) Barnes CJ, Kumar R. Epidermal growth factor receptor family tyrosine kinases as signal integrators and therapeutic targets. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2003;22:3017.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
(34) Gschwind A, Fischer OM, Ullrich A. The discovery of receptor tyrosine kinases: targets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:36170.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
(35) Robles AI, Linke SP, Harris CC. The p53 network in lung carcinogenesis. Oncogene 2002;21:6898907.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
(36) Gealy R, Zhang L, Siegfried JM, Luketich JD, Keohavong P. Comparison of mutations in the p53 and K-ras genes in lung carcinomas from smoking and nonsmoking women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:297302.
(37) Vahakangas KH, Bennett WP, Castren K, Welsh JA, Khan MA, Blomeke B, et al. p53 and K-ras mutations in lung cancers from former and never-smoking women. Cancer Res 2001;61:43506.
(38) Toyooka S, Tsuda T, Gazdar AF. The TP 53 gene, tobacco exposure, and lung cancer. Hum Mutat 2003;21:22939.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Manuscript received July 30, 2004; revised September 30, 2004; accepted January 6, 2005.
Correspondence about this Article
Editorial about this Article
Related Memo to the Media
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006 98: 362-363.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 326-328.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 97: 325.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Mason, E. V. Morlock, M. R. Karagas, K. T. Kelsey, C. J. Marsit, A. R. Schned, and A. S. Andrew EGFR pathway polymorphisms and bladder cancer susceptibility and prognosis Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2009; 30(7): 1155 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Morita, I. Okamoto, K. Kobayashi, K. Yamazaki, H. Asahina, A. Inoue, K. Hagiwara, N. Sunaga, N. Yanagitani, T. Hida, et al. Combined Survival Analysis of Prospective Clinical Trials of Gefitinib for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutations Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2009; 15(13): 4493 - 4498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Brambilla and A. Gazdar Pathogenesis of lung cancer signalling pathways: roadmap for therapies Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2009; 33(6): 1485 - 1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bai, L. Mao, h. S. Wang, J. Zhao, L. Yang, t. T. An, X. Wang, c. J. Duan, n. M. Wu, z. Q. Guo, et al. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Plasma DNA Samples Predict Tumor Response in Chinese Patients With Stages IIIB to IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2009; 27(16): 2653 - 2659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Tassinari, E. Scarpi, S. Sartori, E. Tamburini, C. Santelmo, P. Tombesi, and L. Lazzari-Agli Second-Line Treatments in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of Literature and Metaanalysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Chest, June 1, 2009; 135(6): 1596 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Borczuk Micropapillary Histology: A Frequent Morphology of Mutation-Associated Lung Adenocarcinoma? Am J Clin Pathol, May 1, 2009; 131(5): 615 - 617. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Borczuk, R. L. Toonkel, and C. A. Powell Genomics of Lung Cancer Proceedings of the ATS, April 15, 2009; 6(2): 152 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kuang, A. Rogers, B. Y. Yeap, L. Wang, M. Makrigiorgos, K. Vetrand, S. Thiede, R. J. Distel, and P. A. Janne Noninvasive Detection of EGFR T790M in Gefitinib or Erlotinib Resistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2009; 15(8): 2630 - 2636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Sartori, A. Cavazza, A. Sgambato, A. Marchioni, F. Barbieri, L. Longo, M. Bavieri, B. Murer, E. Meschiari, S. Tamberi, et al. EGFR and K-ras Mutations Along the Spectrum of Pulmonary Epithelial Tumors of the Lung and Elaboration of a Combined Clinicopathologic and Molecular Scoring System to Predict Clinical Responsiveness to EGFR Inhibitors Am J Clin Pathol, April 1, 2009; 131(4): 478 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Gow, Y.-L. Chang, Y.-C. Hsu, M.-F. Tsai, C.-T. Wu, C.-J. Yu, C.-H. Yang, Y.-C. Lee, P.-C. Yang, and J.-Y. Shih Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations between primary and corresponding metastatic tumors in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive non-small-cell lung cancer Ann. Onc., April 1, 2009; 20(4): 696 - 702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Hsu, C. R. Acharya, B. S. Balakumaran, R. F. Riedel, M. K. Kim, M. Stevenson, S. Tuchman, S. Mukherjee, W. Barry, H. K. Dressman, et al. Characterizing the developmental pathways TTF-1, NKX2-8, and PAX9 in lung cancer PNAS, March 31, 2009; 106(13): 5312 - 5317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Inoue, K. Kobayashi, K. Usui, M. Maemondo, S. Okinaga, I. Mikami, M. Ando, K. Yamazaki, Y. Saijo, A. Gemma, et al. First-Line Gefitinib for Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations Without Indication for Chemotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2009; 27(9): 1394 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Langer The "Lazarus Response" in Treatment-Naive, Poor Performance Status Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2009; 27(9): 1350 - 1354. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jiang Overview of Gefitinib in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Asian Perspective Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2009; 39(3): 137 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakanishi, S. Matsumoto, R. Iwakawa, T. Kohno, K. Suzuki, K. Tsuta, Y. Matsuno, M. Noguchi, E. Shimizu, and J. Yokota Whole Genome Comparison of Allelic Imbalance between Noninvasive and Invasive Small-Sized Lung Adenocarcinomas Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 69(4): 1615 - 1623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Laurent-Puig, A. Lievre, and H. Blons Mutations and Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 15(4): 1133 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A-M. Ruppert, M. Beau-Faller, A. Neuville, E. Guerin, A-C. Voegeli, B. Mennecier, M. Legrain, A. Molard, M-Y. Jeung, M-P. Gaub, et al. EGFR-TKI and lung adenocarcinoma with CNS relapse: interest of molecular follow-up Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2009; 33(2): 436 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cappuzzo, P. A. Janne, M. Skokan, G. Finocchiaro, E. Rossi, C. Ligorio, P. A. Zucali, L. Terracciano, L. Toschi, M. Roncalli, et al. MET increased gene copy number and primary resistance to gefitinib therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients Ann. Onc., February 1, 2009; 20(2): 298 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Pantaleo, M. Nannini, A. Maleddu, S. Fanti, C. Nanni, S. Boschi, F. Lodi, G. Nicoletti, L. Landuzzi, P. L. Lollini, et al. Experimental results and related clinical implications of PET detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) in cancer Ann. Onc., February 1, 2009; 20(2): 213 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Okabe, I. Okamoto, S. Tsukioka, J. Uchida, E. Hatashita, Y. Yamada, T. Yoshida, K. Nishio, M. Fukuoka, P. A. Janne, et al. Addition of S-1 to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Gefitinib Overcomes Gefitinib Resistance in Non-small cell Lung Cancer Cell Lines with MET Amplification Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2009; 15(3): 907 - 913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nose, K. Sugio, T. Oyama, T. Nozoe, H. Uramoto, T. Iwata, T. Onitsuka, and K. Yasumoto Association Between Estrogen Receptor-{beta} Expression and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in the Postoperative Prognosis of Adenocarcinoma of the Lung J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2009; 27(3): 411 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Hirsch, R. S. Herbst, C. Olsen, K. Chansky, J. Crowley, K. Kelly, W. A. Franklin, P. A. Bunn Jr, M. Varella-Garcia, and D. R. Gandara In Reply J. Clin. Oncol., January 20, 2009; 27(3): 465 - 467. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Soda, S. Takada, K. Takeuchi, Y. L. Choi, M. Enomoto, T. Ueno, H. Haruta, T. Hamada, Y. Yamashita, Y. Ishikawa, et al. A mouse model for EML4-ALK-positive lung cancer PNAS, December 16, 2008; 105(50): 19893 - 19897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takano, T. Fukui, Y. Ohe, K. Tsuta, S. Yamamoto, H. Nokihara, N. Yamamoto, I. Sekine, H. Kunitoh, K. Furuta, et al. EGFR Mutations Predict Survival Benefit From Gefitinib in Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Historical Comparison of Patients Treated Before and After Gefitinib Approval in Japan J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2008; 26(34): 5589 - 5595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-G. Wu, Y.-L. Chang, Y.-C. Hsu, J.-Y. Wu, C.-H. Yang, C.-J. Yu, M.-F. Tsai, J.-Y. Shih, and P.-C. Yang Good Response to Gefitinib in Lung Adenocarcinoma of Complex Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations with the Classical Mutation Pattern Oncologist, December 1, 2008; 13(12): 1276 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Pratilas, A. J. Hanrahan, E. Halilovic, Y. Persaud, J. Soh, D. Chitale, H. Shigematsu, H. Yamamoto, A. Sawai, M. Janakiraman, et al. Genetic Predictors of MEK Dependence in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 68(22): 9375 - 9383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yonesaka, K. Zejnullahu, N. Lindeman, A. J. Homes, D. M. Jackman, F. Zhao, A. M. Rogers, B. E. Johnson, and P. A. Janne Autocrine Production of Amphiregulin Predicts Sensitivity to Both Gefitinib and Cetuximab in EGFR Wild-type Cancers Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 14(21): 6963 - 6973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Costa, K.-S. H. Nguyen, B. C. Cho, L. V. Sequist, D. M. Jackman, G. J. Riely, B. Y. Yeap, B. Halmos, J. H. Kim, P. A. Janne, et al. Effects of Erlotinib in EGFR Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers with Resistance to Gefitinib Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 14(21): 7060 - 7067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Janne Gefitinib First or Gefitinib Second: Is Timing Everything in the Treatment of EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2008; 178(8): 783 - 785. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Wu, C.-J. Yu, C.-H. Yang, S.-G. Wu, Y.-H. Chiu, C.-H. Gow, Y.-C. Chang, Y.-C. Hsu, P.-F. Wei, J.-Y. Shih, et al. First- or Second-line Therapy with Gefitinib Produces Equal Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2008; 178(8): 847 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Fichtner, J. Rolff, R. Soong, J. Hoffmann, S. Hammer, A. Sommer, M. Becker, and J. Merk Establishment of Patient-Derived Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Xenografts as Models for the Identification of Predictive Biomarkers Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 14(20): 6456 - 6468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S-G. Wu, C-H. Gow, C-J. Yu, Y-L. Chang, C-H. Yang, Y-C. Hsu, J-Y. Shih, Y-C. Lee, and P-C. Yang Frequent epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in malignant pleural effusion of lung adenocarcinoma Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2008; 32(4): 924 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. VanMeter, A. S. Rodriguez, E. D. Bowman, J. Jen, C. C. Harris, J. Deng, V. S. Calvert, A. Silvestri, C. Fredolini, V. Chandhoke, et al. Laser Capture Microdissection and Protein Microarray Analysis of Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Differential Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGPR) Phosphorylation Events Associated with Mutated EGFR Compared with Wild Type Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2008; 7(10): 1902 - 1924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tatematsu, J. Shimizu, Y. Murakami, Y. Horio, S. Nakamura, T. Hida, T. Mitsudomi, and Y. Yatabe Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 14(19): 6092 - 6096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Guha, R. Chaerkady, A. Marimuthu, A. S. Patterson, M. K. Kashyap, H. C. Harsha, M. Sato, J. S. Bader, A. E. Lash, J. D. Minna, et al. Comparisons of tyrosine phosphorylated proteins in cells expressing lung cancer-specific alleles of EGFR and KRAS PNAS, September 16, 2008; 105(37): 14112 - 14117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-Q. Zhu, G. da Cunha Santos, K. Ding, A. Sakurada, J.-C. Cutz, N. Liu, T. Zhang, P. Marrano, M. Whitehead, J. A. Squire, et al. Role of KRAS and EGFR As Biomarkers of Response to Erlotinib in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21 J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2008; 26(26): 4268 - 4275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yamamoto, H. Shigematsu, M. Nomura, W. W. Lockwood, M. Sato, N. Okumura, J. Soh, M. Suzuki, I. I. Wistuba, K. M. Fong, et al. PIK3CA Mutations and Copy Number Gains in Human Lung Cancers Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 6913 - 6921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-S. Seo, D. D. Liu, B. N. Bekele, M.-K. Kim, K. Pisters, S. M. Lippman, I. I. Wistuba, and J. S. Koo Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein Overexpression: A Feature Associated with Negative Prognosis in Never Smokers with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 68(15): 6065 - 6073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Tang, M. Varella-Garcia, A. C. Xavier, E. Massarelli, N. Ozburn, C. Moran, and I. I. Wistuba Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Abnormalities in the Pathogenesis and Progression of Lung Adenocarcinomas Cancer Prevention Research, August 1, 2008; 1(3): 192 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Wu, S.-G. Wu, C.-H. Yang, C.-H. Gow, Y.-L. Chang, C.-J. Yu, J.-Y. Shih, and P.-C. Yang Lung Cancer with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Mutations Is Associated with Poor Gefitinib Treatment Response Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 14(15): 4877 - 4882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Braiteh, R. Kurzrock, and F. M. Johnson Trichomegaly of the Eyelashes After Lung Cancer Treatment with the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Erlotinib J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2008; 26(20): 3460 - 3462. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. L. Choi, K. Takeuchi, M. Soda, K. Inamura, Y. Togashi, S. Hatano, M. Enomoto, T. Hamada, H. Haruta, H. Watanabe, et al. Identification of Novel Isoforms of the EML4-ALK Transforming Gene in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 68(13): 4971 - 4976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Bell, B. W. Brannigan, K. Matsuo, D. M. Finkelstein, R. Sordella, J. Settleman, T. Mitsudomi, and D. A. Haber Increased Prevalence of EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer in Women and in East Asian Populations: Analysis of Estrogen-Related Polymorphisms Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 14(13): 4079 - 4084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Felip, F. Rojo, M. Reck, A. Heller, B. Klughammer, G. Sala, S. Cedres, S. Peralta, H. Maacke, D. Foernzler, et al. A Phase II Pharmacodynamic Study of Erlotinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated with Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3867 - 3874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Engelman and P. A. Janne Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 14(10): 2895 - 2899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Hodkinson, A. MacKinnon, and T. Sethi Targeting Growth Factors in Lung Cancer Chest, May 1, 2008; 133(5): 1209 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Ruosaari, P. E.H. Nymark, M. M. Aavikko, E. Kettunen, S. Knuutila, J. Hollmen, H. Norppa, and S. L. Anttila Aberrations of chromosome 19 in asbestos-associated lung cancer and in asbestos-induced micronuclei of bronchial epithelial cells in vitro Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2008; 29(5): 913 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Li, D. Chitale, G. J. Riely, W. Pao, V. A. Miller, M. F. Zakowski, V. Rusch, M. G. Kris, and M. Ladanyi EGFR Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinomas: Clinical Testing Experience and Relationship to EGFR Gene Copy Number and Immunohistochemical Expression J. Mol. Diagn., May 1, 2008; 10(3): 242 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kumar, E. T. Petri, B. Halmos, and T. J. Boggon Structure and Clinical Relevance of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Human Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 26(10): 1742 - 1751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yatabe, T. Takahashi, and T. Mitsudomi Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Amplification Is Acquired in Association with Tumor Progression of EGFR-Mutated Lung Cancer Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2106 - 2111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G D Smith, B E Chadwick, C Willmore-Payne, and J S Bentz Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in cytology specimens from patients with non-small cell lung cancer utilising high-resolution melting amplicon analysis J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2008; 61(4): 487 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Ciardiello and G. Tortora EGFR Antagonists in Cancer Treatment N. Engl. J. Med., March 13, 2008; 358(11): 1160 - 1174. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pinter, J. Papay, A. Almasi, Z. Sapi, E. Szabo, M. Kanya, A. Tamasi, B. Jori, E. Varkondi, J. Moldvay, et al. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) High Gene Copy Number and Activating Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinomas Are Not Consistently Accompanied by Positivity for EGFR Protein by Standard Immunohistochemistry J. Mol. Diagn., March 1, 2008; 10(2): 160 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Jagadeeswaran, H. Surawska, S. Krishnaswamy, V. Janamanchi, A. C. Mackinnon, T. Y. Seiwert, S. Loganathan, R. Kanteti, T. Reichman, V. Nallasura, et al. Paxillin Is a Target for Somatic Mutations in Lung Cancer: Implications for Cell Growth and Invasion Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 68(1): 132 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Gow, C.-R. Chien, Y.-L. Chang, Y.-H. Chiu, S.-H. Kuo, J.-Y. Shih, Y.-C. Chang, C.-J. Yu, C.-H. Yang, and P.-C. Yang Radiotherapy in Lung Adenocarcinoma with Brain Metastases: Effects of Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations on Clinical Response Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 162 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Toyooka, K. Matsuo, H. Shigematsu, T. Kosaka, M. Tokumo, Y. Yatabe, S. Ichihara, M. Inukai, H. Suehisa, J. Soh, et al. The Impact of Sex and Smoking Status on the Mutational Spectrum of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene in Non small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5763 - 5768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Doody, Y. Wang, S. N. Patel, C. Joynes, S. P. Lee, J. Gerlak, R. L. Rolser, Y. Li, P. Steiner, R. Bassi, et al. Inhibitory activity of cetuximab on epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non small cell lung cancers Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2007; 6(10): 2642 - 2651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Suehisa, S. Toyooka, K. Hotta, A. Uchida, J. Soh, Y. Fujiwara, K. Matsuo, M. Ouchida, M. Takata, K. Kiura, et al. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status and Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Uracil-Tegafur for Adenocarcinoma of the Lung J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3952 - 3957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Padron, M. Sato, J. W. Shay, A. F. Gazdar, J. D. Minna, and M. G. Roth Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors with Tyrosine Kinase Domain Mutations Exhibit Reduced Cbl Association, Poor Ubiquitylation, and Down-regulation but Are Efficiently Internalized Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 67(16): 7695 - 7702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ogino, H. Kitao, S. Hirano, A. Uchida, M. Ishiai, T. Kozuki, N. Takigawa, M. Takata, K. Kiura, and M. Tanimoto Emergence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor T790M Mutation during Chronic Exposure to Gefitinib in a Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Line Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 67(16): 7807 - 7814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Seike, N. Yanaihara, E. D. Bowman, K. A. Zanetti, A. Budhu, K. Kumamoto, L. E. Mechanic, S. Matsumoto, J. Yokota, T. Shibata, et al. Use of a Cytokine Gene Expression Signature in Lung Adenocarcinoma and the Surrounding Tissue as a Prognostic Classifier J Natl Cancer Inst, August 15, 2007; 99(16): 1257 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-K. Wong HKI-272 in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 13(15): 4593s - 4596s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Bonomi, L. Buckingham, and J. Coon Selecting Patients for Treatment with Epidermal Growth Factor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 13(15): 4606s - 4612s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Haussmann Smoking and Lung Cancer: Future Research Directions International Journal of Toxicology, July 1, 2007; 26(4): 353 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Finberg, L. V. Sequist, V. A. Joshi, A. Muzikansky, J. M. Miller, M. Han, J. Beheshti, L. R. Chirieac, E. J. Mark, and A. J. Iafrate Mucinous Differentiation Correlates with Absence of EGFR Mutation and Presence of KRAS Mutation in Lung Adenocarcinomas with Bronchioloalveolar Features J. Mol. Diagn., July 1, 2007; 9(3): 320 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gridelli, M. A. Bareschino, C. Schettino, A. Rossi, P. Maione, and F. Ciardiello Erlotinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment: Current Status and Future Development Oncologist, July 1, 2007; 12(7): 840 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mounawar, A. Mukeria, F. Le Calvez, R. J. Hung, H. Renard, A. Cortot, C. Bollart, D. Zaridze, P. Brennan, P. Boffetta, et al. Patterns of EGFR, HER2, TP53, and KRAS Mutations of p14arf Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers in Relation to Smoking History Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 67(12): 5667 - 5672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Yamasaki, M. J. Johansen, D. Zhang, S. Krishnamurthy, E. Felix, C. Bartholomeusz, R. J. Aguilar, K. Kurisu, G. B. Mills, G. N. Hortobagyi, et al. Acquired Resistance to Erlotinib in A-431 Epidermoid Cancer Cells Requires Down-regulation of MMAC1/PTEN and Up-regulation of Phosphorylated Akt Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 67(12): 5779 - 5788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wislez, M. Antoine, N. Rabbe, V. Gounant, V. Poulot, A. Lavole, J. Fleury-Feith, and J. Cadranel Neutrophils Promote Aerogenous Spread of Lung Adenocarcinoma with Bronchioloalveolar Carcinoma Features Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3518 - 3527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li, M. Zhao, P. He, M. Hidalgo, and S. D. Baker Differential Metabolism of Gefitinib and Erlotinib by Human Cytochrome P450 Enzymes Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3731 - 3737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Temam, H. Kawaguchi, A. K. El-Naggar, J. Jelinek, H. Tang, D. D. Liu, W. Lang, J.-P. Issa, J. J. Lee, and L. Mao Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Copy Number Alterations Correlate With Poor Clinical Outcome in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 25(16): 2164 - 2170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cappuzzo, C. Ligorio, P. A. Janne, L. Toschi, E. Rossi, R. Trisolini, D. Paioli, A. J. Holmes, E. Magrini, G. Finocchiaro, et al. Prospective Study of Gefitinib in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization-Positive/Phospho-Akt-Positive or Never Smoker Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The ONCOBELL Trial J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2007; 25(16): 2248 - 2255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Horiike, H. Kimura, K. Nishio, F. Ohyanagi, Y. Satoh, S. Okumura, Y. Ishikawa, K. Nakagawa, T. Horai, and M. Nishio Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in Transbronchial Needle Aspirates of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Chest, June 1, 2007; 131(6): 1628 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Massarelli, M. Varella-Garcia, X. Tang, A. C. Xavier, N. C. Ozburn, D. D. Liu, B. N. Bekele, R. S. Herbst, and I. I. Wistuba KRAS Mutation Is an Important Predictor of Resistance to Therapy with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 13(10): 2890 - 2896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Hirsch, M Varella-Garcia, F Cappuzzo, J McCoy, L Bemis, A. Xavier, R Dziadziuszko, P Gumerlock, K Chansky, H West, et al. Combination of EGFR gene copy number and protein expression predicts outcome for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib Ann. Onc., April 1, 2007; 18(4): 752 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-K. Toh and W.-T. Lim Lung cancer in never-smokers J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2007; 60(4): 337 - 340. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Leone, Y. Pignochino, G. Cavalloni, and M. Aglietta Targeting of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Patients Affected by Biliary Tract Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2007; 25(9): 1145 - 1145. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Jackman, B. Y. Yeap, N. I. Lindeman, P. Fidias, M. S. Rabin, J. Temel, A. T. Skarin, M. Meyerson, A. J. Holmes, A. M. Borras, et al. Phase II Clinical Trial of Chemotherapy-Naive Patients >= 70 Years of Age Treated With Erlotinib for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2007; 25(7): 760 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Okabe, I. Okamoto, K. Tamura, M. Terashima, T. Yoshida, T. Satoh, M. Takada, M. Fukuoka, and K. Nakagawa Differential Constitutive Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Bearing EGFR Gene Mutation and Amplification Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 67(5): 2046 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhang and A. Chang Somatic mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor and non-small-cell lung cancer J. Med. Genet., March 1, 2007; 44(3): 166 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Subramanian and R. Govindan Lung Cancer in Never Smokers: A Review J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2007; 25(5): 561 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. Sequist, D. W. Bell, T. J. Lynch, and D. A. Haber Molecular Predictors of Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antagonists in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2007; 25(5): 587 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Toschi and F. Cappuzzo Understanding the New Genetics of Responsiveness to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Oncologist, February 1, 2007; 12(2): 211 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Borczuk and C. A. Powell Expression Profiling and Lung Cancer Development Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2007; 4(1): 127 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N van Zandwijk, A Mathy, L Boerrigter, H Ruijter, I Tielen, D de Jong, P Baas, S Burgers, and P Nederlof EGFR and KRAS mutations as criteria for treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: retro- and prospective observations in non-small-cell lung cancer Ann. Onc., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 99 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-L. Chang, C.-T. Wu, S.-C. Lin, C.-F. Hsiao, Y.-S. Jou, and Y.-C. Lee Clonality and Prognostic Implications of p53 and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Somatic Aberrations in Multiple Primary Lung Cancers Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 13(1): 52 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fukazawa, Y. Maeda, M. L. Durbin, T. Nakai, J. Matsuoka, H. Tanaka, Y. Naomoto, and N. Tanaka Pulmonary adenocarcinoma-targeted gene therapy by a cancer- and tissue-specific promoter system Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2007; 6(1): 244 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zhang, S. Kalyankrishna, M. Wislez, N. Thilaganathan, B. Saigal, W. Wei, L. Ma, I. I. Wistuba, F. M. Johnson, and J. M. Kurie Src-Family Kinases Are Activated in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Promote the Survival of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Dependent Cell Lines Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2007; 170(1): 366 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Chin, D. Anuar, R. Soo, M. Salto-Tellez, W. Q. Li, B. Ahmad, S. C. Lee, B. C. Goh, K. Kawakami, A. Segal, et al. Detection of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Variations by Partially Denaturing HPLC Clin. Chem., January 1, 2007; 53(1): 62 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. Sequist, V. A. Joshi, P. A. Janne, A. Muzikansky, P. Fidias, M. Meyerson, D. A. Haber, R. Kucherlapati, B. E. Johnson, and T. J. Lynch Response to treatment and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing somatic EGFR mutation testing. Oncologist, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 90 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Perez-Torres, M. Guix, A. Gonzalez, and C. L. Arteaga Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Antibody Down-regulates Mutant Receptors and Inhibits Tumors Expressing EGFR Mutations J. Biol. Chem., December 29, 2006; 281(52): 40183 - 40192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rosell, M. Taron, N. Reguart, D. Isla, and T. Moran Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation: How Exon 19 and 21 Mutations Changed Our Understanding of the Pathway Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7222 - 7231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Riely, K. A. Politi, V. A. Miller, and W. Pao Update on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7232 - 7241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kobayashi, T. Shimamura, S. Monti, U. Steidl, C. J. Hetherington, A. M. Lowell, T. Golub, M. Meyerson, D. G. Tenen, G. I. Shapiro, et al. Transcriptional Profiling Identifies Cyclin D1 as a Critical Downstream Effector of Mutant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 66(23): 11389 - 11398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



























