Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005 97(12):879; doi:10.1093/jnci/97.12.879
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zielinski, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zielinski, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Oxford University Press

NEWS

In Brief

Sarah L. Zielinski

Radical Prostatectomy Reduces Prostate Cancer, Overall Mortality, Study Finds

Men with early prostate cancer who are treated with radical prostatectomy have a lower risk of death from prostate cancer and a lower risk of dying from any cause than men treated with watchful waiting, according to a new study.

A group of Swedish researchers, led by Anna Bill-Axelson, M.D., and Lars Holmberg, M.D., Ph.D., from University Hospital, Uppsala, conducted a clinical trial in which 695 men with early prostate cancer were randomly assigned to either a radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. In 2002, the researchers reported that, after a mean follow-up of 6.2 years, radical prostatectomy reduced the risk of death due to prostate cancer by 50% (8.9% in the control group compared with 4.6% in the surgery group). However, there was no statistically significant reduction in overall mortality.

In the May 12 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, the group reported results after a median follow-up of 8.2 years. During this time, 83 men in the surgery group died, including 30 (8.5%) from prostate cancer, compared with 106 men in the watchful-waiting group, including 50 (14.4%) from prostate cancer. There was a 10-year absolute benefit in overall mortality of 5% among men who had a radical prostatectomy.

Substantial Reduction in Recurrence, Mortality Found for Adjuvant Treatments for Breast Cancer

Several of the adjuvant chemotherapies and hormonal therapies commonly used to treat early breast cancer have a much greater mortality benefit after 15 years than after 5 years, and this may be one reason for the decrease in breast cancer mortality in many countries including the United States, according to a new study.

In early breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy are used after surgery to treat potentially undetected disease that could develop into a clinical recurrence over time. Because the many randomized trials that have examined the various treatments for breast cancer have had different lengths of follow-up, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group was set up in the mid-1980s to coordinate every 5 years worldwide meta-analyses of centrally collected follow-up data from the women who participated in these trials. In the May 14 issue of The Lancet, the group published a meta-analysis of 194 trials of adjuvant systemic therapy that had included approximately 145,000 women with long-term follow-up.

Among the findings were that 6 months of an adjuvant anthracycline-based regimen reduced the annual rate of death from breast cancer by 38% among women younger than age 50 and by 20% in women ages 50–69. For women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive disease, 5 years of adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen reduced the annual rate of death from breast cancer by 31% and was more effective than 1–2 years of tamoxifen. The group estimated that for middle-age women with ER-positive breast cancer, the rate of death from breast cancer would be halved in 15 years through the use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by 5 years of tamoxifen. However, further improvements could be made in long-term survival through the use of newer treatment regimens or better use of old ones, they conclude.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zielinski, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zielinski, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?