Skip Navigation

Correction for Elmore and Carney, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 96 (3) 162-163.
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(9):719; doi:10.1093/jnci/djh113
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

Erratum

Erratum: "Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer: Has Promise Outstripped Performance?" by Elmore and Carney [J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:162–3 (Issue 3)]. On pages 162–163, the fourth sentence in the sixth paragraph should read as follows: "It is generally the case that the recall rate for subsequent examinations (incidence screens) is lower than the recall rate for initial examinations (prevalence screens)." The authors regret the error.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?