Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2004 96(23):1795; doi:10.1093/jnci/djh342
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsurutani, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dennis, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsurutani, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dennis, P. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowResponse to this Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Oxford University Press

CORRESPONDENCE

Re: Akt Phosphorylation and Gefitinib Efficacy in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Junji Tsurutani, Phillip A. Dennis

Affiliation of authors: Cancer Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

Correspondence to: Phillip A. Dennis, MD, PhD, Cancer Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 8901 Wisconsin Ave., Bldg. 8, Rm. 5101, Bethesda, MD 20889 (e-mail: dennisp{at}mail.nih.gov)

In a recent article in the Journal, Cappuzzo et al. (1) presented data that Akt activation, as assessed by the phosphorylation status of S473 (pAkt), was associated with sensitivity to gefitinib in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients whose tumors were positive for pAkt had a better response rate, "disease control rate," and time to progression than patients whose tumors were negative for pAkt. Despite the authors’ encouraging interpretation, we believe these data are confounded by two important factors.

First, the scoring for phosphorylation of Akt in immunohistochemical analysis was not consistent with published data [for example, see (2,3), references within] (16), and may have led to false negative interpretations of samples that actually contained active Akt. The authors’ criteria for positive staining considered only nuclear staining of S473 phosphorylation. Distribution and intensity criteria for nuclear staining were not mentioned, and it is not clear how the presence of membranous and/or cytoplasmic staining was handled. We believe that excluding tumors with positive membranous or cytoplasmic staining is inappropriate because Akt activation occurs at the plasma membrane, the location where the components involved in Akt activation are assembled. Moreover, after activation at the plasma membrane, Akt translocates through the cytoplasm to subcellular organelles, such as the nucleus or mitochondria. Therefore, the methodology used by Cappuzzo et al. (1) for scoring raises the possibility that the number of tumors with increased pAkt may have been underestimated, which could have resulted in an overestimation of the strength of the association between response rate and pAkt status. In support of potential underreporting of Akt activity, the prevalence of S473 phosphorylation in their study was lower than that reported previously in other studies that assessed S473 phosphorylation in NSCLC specimens (46). Of note, these other studies characterized S473 phosphorylation as being predominantly cytoplasmic.

The second confounding factor in the study by Cappuzzo et al. (1) is that the authors did not mention whether patients received other therapies after gefitinib. This omission is important because their current study was originally part of a separate study evaluating EGFR and HER2 expression (7). The contribution of other therapies to the clinical endpoints including time to progression and overall survival could be substantial. Until the issues of immunohistochemical scoring and other therapies are settled, we believe that caution should be observed when interpreting the results of the study by Cappuzzo et al. (1).

REFERENCES

1 Cappuzzo F, Magrini E, Ceresoli GL, Bartolini S, Rossi E, Ludovini V, et al. Akt phosphorylation and gefitinib efficacy in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1133–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2 Nam SY, Lee HS, Jung GA, Choi J, Cho SJ, Kim MK, et al. Akt/PKB activation in gastric carcinomas correlates with clinicopathologic variables and prognosis. Apmis 2003;111:1105–13.[CrossRef][Medline]

3 Schlieman MG, Fahy BN, Ramsamooj R, Beckett L, Bold RJ. Incidence, mechanism and prognostic value of activated AKT in pancreas cancer. Br J Cancer 2003;89:2110–5.[CrossRef][Medline]

4 Mukohara T, Kudoh S, Yamauchi S, Kimura T, Yoshimura N, Kanazawa H, et al. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and downstream-activated peptides in surgically excised non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 2003;41:123–30.[ISI][Medline]

5 Tsao AS, McDonnell T, Lam S, Putnam JB, Bekele N, Hong WK, et al. Increased phospho-AKT (Ser(473)) expression in bronchial dysplasia: implications for lung cancer prevention studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:660–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6 Lee SH, Kim HS, Park WS, Kim SY, Lee KY, Kim SH, et al. Non-small cell lung cancers frequently express phosphorylated Akt; an immunohistochemical study. Apmis 2002;110:587–92.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

7 Cappuzzo F, Gregorc V, Rossi E, Cancellieri A, Magrini E, Paties CT, et al. Gefitinib in pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): analysis of efficacy and correlation with HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor expression in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2658–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Response to this Correspondence

RESPONSE: Re: Akt Phosphorylation and Gefitinib Efficacy in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Federico Cappuzzo
J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96: 1795-1796. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsurutani, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dennis, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsurutani, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dennis, P. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowResponse to this Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?