Skip Navigation

Correction for Osborne et al., J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 95 (5) 353-361.
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2003 95(10):763; doi:10.1093/jnci/95.10.763
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 95, No. 10, 763, May 21, 2003
© 2003 Oxford University Press


CORRESPONDENCE

Erratum

"Role of the Estrogen Receptor Coactivator AIB1 (SRC-3) and HER-2/neu in Tamoxifen Resistance in Breast Cancer" by Osborne et al. [J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:353–61 (Issue 5)]. On page 358, Fig. 2AGo was not the correct figure, although the data in the legend and the text are correct. The correct figure is as follows. The authors regret the error.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier estimates of disease-free survival (DFS). A) DFS according to AIB1 expression for patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy (n = 119). Patients with high AIB1 expression (top quartile: AIB1>1.67 densitometric units) were compared with patients with lower AIB1 expression (<=1.67 densitometric units). B) DFS curves for patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy (n = 119). Patients with high AIB1 expression (top quartile) and low HER-2 expression were compared with patients with high expression of both AIB1 and HER-2, low expression of both AIB1 and HER-2, or low AIB1 expression and high HER-2 expression. C) DFS for patients who received adjuvant tamoxifen therapy (n = 187). Patients with high AIB1 expression (top quartile) and high HER-2 expression (grades 2–4) were compared with patients with high expression of both AIB1 and HER-2, low expression of both AIB1 and HER-2, or low AIB1 expression and high HER-2 expression. All P values refer to two-sided log-rank tests. Numbers below each graph indicate the number of patients remaining at risk in each group. Vertical lines are the 95% confidence intervals at selected time points.

 


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?