Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2001 93(11):824-842; doi:10.1093/jnci/93.11.824
© 2001 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howe, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howe, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, B. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 93, No. 11, 824-842, June 6, 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press


SPECIAL ARTICLE

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer (1973 Through 1998), Featuring Cancers With Recent Increasing Trends

Holly L. Howe, Phyllis A. Wingo, Michael J. Thun, Lynn A. G. Ries, Harry M. Rosenberg, Ellen G. Feigal, Brenda K. Edwards

Affiliations of authors: H. L. Howe, North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL; P. A. Wingo, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA; M. J. Thun, Epidemiology and Surveillance Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta; L. A. G. Ries, B. K. Edwards (Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences), E. G. Feigal (Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; H. M. Rosenberg, Division of Vital Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD.

Correspondence to: Holly L. Howe, Ph.D., North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Inc., 2121 W. White Oaks Dr., Springfield, IL 62704–6495 (e-mail: hhowe{at}naaccr.org).


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Notes
 Discussion
 References
 
Background: The American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, including the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), collaborate to provide an annual update on cancer occurrence and trends in the United States. This year's report contains a special feature that focuses on cancers with recent increasing trends. Methods: From 1992 through 1998, age-adjusted rates and annual percent changes are calculated for cancer incidence and underlying cause of death with the use of NCI incidence and NCHS mortality data. Joinpoint analysis, a model of joined line segments, is used to examine long-term trends for the four most common cancers and for those cancers with recent increasing trends in incidence or mortality. Statistically significant findings are based on a P value of .05 by use of a two-sided test. State-specific incidence and death rates for 1994 through 1998 are reported for major cancers. Results: From 1992 through 1998, total cancer death rates declined in males and females, while cancer incidence rates declined only in males. Incidence rates in females increased slightly, largely because of breast cancer increases that occurred in some older age groups, possibly as a result of increased early detection. Female lung cancer mortality, a major cause of death in women, continued to increase but more slowly than in earlier years. In addition, the incidence or mortality rate increased in 10 other sites, accounting for about 13% of total cancer incidence and mortality in the United States. Conclusions: Overall cancer incidence and death rates continued to decline in the United States. Future progress will require sustained improvements in cancer prevention, screening, and treatment.



    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Notes
 Discussion
 References
 
The American Cancer Society (ACS), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), including the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) and the Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, collaborate to produce an annual report on the current burden of cancer in the United States. Four years ago, the initial report documented the first sustained decline in cancer death rates, a notable reversal in the increases documented since national record keeping was instituted in the 1930s (1). The second and third reports updated and confirmed these declines in both cancer incidence and death rates (2,3). Special features in these reports highlighted lung cancer and the tobacco epidemic (2) and opportunities to improve the prevention, early detection, and treatment of colorectal cancer (3). The current report examines trends from 1973 through 1998 in the incidence and death rates for the four most common cancers (breast, prostate, lung, and colon–rectum cancers), which comprise more than half the cancer burden. This report also features specific cancers for which incidence or death rates increased in one or more population subgroups during the period from 1992 through 1998.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Notes
 Discussion
 References
 
All statistics plus additional data and information on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival are available from the following Internet addresses: URL, www.seer.cancer.gov (NCI); www.naaccr.org/CINAPlus/index.html (NAACCR); www.cdc.gov/cancer/NPCR (CDC); www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/dvs/mortdata.htm (NCHS); and www.cancer.org (ACS). More detailed information, figures, and methodology pertaining to this report are available at the NCI Internet address.

Cancer Cases and Deaths

Information on newly diagnosed cancer cases in the United States is based on data collected by registries in the NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (4) and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) (5). NAACCR evaluates and publishes data annually from registries in both programs (6).

For the long-term trend analyses, SEER incidence data for 1973 through 1998 were used. (These data are based on 10% of the U.S. population.) For the analyses of more recent trends, the SEER incidence data for 1992 through 1998 were used; these data are based on 14% of the U.S. population. For estimates of the proportion of cases and deaths contributed by each cancer, 1998 incidence data from SEER (covering 14% of the U.S. population) and 1998 U.S. mortality data were used. State incidence rates are provided for the four most common cancers from 30 registries that meet NAACCR criteria for highest quality data for 1994 through 1998 (68). Approximately 53% of the U.S. population is included in the NAACCR combined cancer incidence rates. All information on primary site and histology for incidence is converted to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 2nd edition (9), with the use of site groups published previously (4).

Cancer deaths in the United States are reported to state vital statistics offices and are consolidated into a national database by NCHS through the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) (10). NVSS codes the underlying cause of death according to the version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) in use in the United States at the time (11,12). A conversion algorithm ensures comparability between versions of ICD codes, and they are categorized according to SEER site groups (4).

Cancer Incidence and Death Rates

Age-adjusted cancer incidence and death rates were computed by use of aggregated annual county resident population estimates from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Population data for Hawaii were adjusted slightly for an overcount of white persons.

All rates were expressed per 100 000 population and were age-adjusted by the direct method to the 1970 U.S. standard million population. For this report, a rate was calculated when at least 20 cases or deaths occur in the category of interest. The term "all sites" refers to all sites combined (except basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin), including those not shown in the tables or figures.

This year's report features 12 cancers for which incidence or death rates increased from 1992 through 1998, in contrast to the decreasing trends noted for most cancers and for all cancer sites combined. For these cancers, either the SEER incidence rate (based on 14% of the population) or the U.S. death rate increased in either sex among the total, white, or black population. Age-specific trends were not used in the selection of the cancers with increasing trends. The interval of 1992 through 1998 was chosen because the decline in cancer incidence rates began in 1992 (1) and 1998 was the most recent year for which incidence and mortality data were available. Combining all data from 1992 through 1998 also improved the precision of point estimates and the data interpretability for all populations in the analyses (Hispanic, black, American Indian/Alaska Native [AI/AN], Asian/Pacific Islander [API], and white). State cancer incidence and death data for 1994 through 1998 were provided to maximize geographic coverage (for incidence data) and to include the most recent 5 years of available data.

Statistical Analyses

Annual percent change (APC) (4) was used to describe the recent trends from 1992 through 1998, with statistical significance assessed with the use of a two-sided P = .05. The APC for the recent trends is the best measure for comparisons among groups because both the beginning and ending years are the same (3).

Long-term trends are better described by joinpoint analysis (JPA), a model of joined lines (straight lines on a log scale). JPA chooses a model of line segments, such that each is joined at points called a "joinpoint." Each joinpoint denotes a statistically significant change in trend (13). For JPA, the overall statistical significance level was set to P = .05, with a maximum of three joinpoints and four line segments allowed. An APC was used to describe the trend for each line segment. On the figures, lines represent predicted trends and symbols represent observed rates.


    RESULTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Notes
 Discussion
 References
 
General Update on Overall Trends: All Sites Combined

Cancer incidence rates for all sites combined decreased from 1992 through 1998 among all persons in the United States (Fig. 1Go), primarily because of a decline of 2.9% per year in white males and 3.1% per year in black males (Table 1Go). Among females, cancer incidence rates increased 0.3% per year. During 1992 through 1998, overall cancer death rates declined 1.1% per year (Table 2Go; Fig. 1Go). The change was greater among males than among females (declines of 1.6% and 0.8% annually, respectively), with the greatest decrease in black males (decline of 2.0% per year).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. All cancers and all cancers except prostate, incidence and death rates, joinpoint analyses for 1973 through 1998, all races, both sexes. Incidence data are from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program areas covering 10% of the U.S. population. Death data are from the National Center for Health Statistics covering the entire U.S. population. Rates are per 100 000 persons and are age-adjusted to the 1970 U.S. standard million population.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Cancer incidence rates and trends for 1992 through 1998 and joinpoint analyses for 1973 through 1998 for the most common cancers and the 12 cancers with recent increasing rates by site, sex, and race*
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Cancer death rates and trends for 1992 through 1998 and joinpoint analyses for 1973 through 1998 for the most common cancers and the 12 cancers with recent increasing rates by site, sex, and race*
 
Long-term trends in incidence and mortality were analyzed (Fig. 1Go; Table 1Go) both with and without the inclusion of prostate cancer to assess the effects of the sudden increase in diagnosis of prostate cancer on the overall cancer incidence and to help put recent trends in context. JPA revealed three trends in overall cancer incidence rates from 1973 through 1998 for all sites, both sexes, and all races combined: Rates increased from 1973 through 1982, accelerated from 1982 through 1992, and declined from 1992 through 19981 (Fig. 1Go; Table 1Go). The exclusion of prostate cancer eliminates the sharp increase in cancer incidence that peaked in 1992 and suggests that the decrease in all other cancers actually began 5 years earlier (in 1987). The recent decline in cancer incidence is evident both with and without the inclusion of prostate cancer. Long-term mortality trends were similar regardless of the inclusion or exclusion of prostate cancer. When all sites are combined, death rates increased from 1973 through 1991, were level from 1991 through 1994, and declined 1.4% per year from 1994 through 1998 (Fig. 1Go; Table 2Go). The trends in cancer incidence and death rates varied by sex and race (Tables 1 and 2GoGo).

Update on the Most Common Cancer Sites

Cancers of the breast, prostate, lung, and colon–rectum accounted for 55.9% of all 1998 SEER cases and 52.7% of all 1998 cancer deaths in the United States. Changes in the rates for these sites, therefore, have a strong influence on overall cancer trends. Results from incidence and mortality trend analyses for the top 10 cancers are provided on the NCI Internet site. The 1992 through 1998 trends in incidence rates for these cancers were level or were declining, with the exception of increasing trends in melanoma and in female breast cancer. Death rates decreased for all of the top 10 sites, except non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and female lung cancer, both of which were increasing.

Breast (7.8% of 1998 deaths; 16.3% of 1998 cases). During the period from 1973 through 1998, female breast cancer incidence rates increased by more than 40%, from 82.6 in 1973 to 118.1 in 1998. Rates increased differentially by age and race. For white women, breast cancer incidence rates increased by 3.9% per year between 1980 and 1987 (Table 1Go; Fig. 2Go) and by 0.4% per year between 1987 and 1998. Breast cancer incidence rates for black women were lower than for white women; however, the increase for black women was similar to that for white women from 1979 through 1986 and larger for black women from 1986 through 1998 (Fig. 2Go; Table 1Go). Among white women and black women, trends in incidence rates varied by age (Fig. 3Go). Since the late 1980s, the increase in breast cancer incidence rates in white women was seen primarily in women 50–74 years old. Among black women 50 years old or older, incidence rates increased from 1973 through 1998, although it was more difficult to distinguish changes in the age-specific trends because of variability in annual rates resulting from small numbers of cases. The increases in incidence rates were limited to early-stage breast cancer [American Joint Committee on Cancer stages I and II (14)] in both black women and white women, as well as in situ disease (data not shown). Increases from 1994 through 1998 in the incidence of stage II lymph node-positive breast cancer among white women 50–64 years old were seen, in contrast to the decline observed from 1984 through 1994. No increases in breast cancer incidence were apparent in either black or white women less than 50 years old. During 1992 through 1998, incidence rates increased in API women, while trends for AI/AN and Hispanic women were difficult to interpret because of small numbers of cases (data not shown).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Female breast cancer incidence and death rates by race, 1973 through 1998. Incidence data are from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program areas covering 10% of the U.S. population. Death data are from the National Center for Health Statistics covering the entire U.S. population. Rates are per 100 000 females and are age-adjusted to the 1970 U.S. standard million population.

 


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Female breast cancer incidence by age and race, 1973 through 1998. Incidence data are from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program areas covering 10% of the U.S. population. Rates are per 100 000 females and are age-adjusted to the 1970 U.S. standard million population.

 
Death rates from breast cancer decreased by 1.6% annually for all races combined from 1989 through 1995; the decrease then accelerated to a decline of 3.4% annually from 1995 through 1998 (Table 2Go). The breast cancer death rates declined among white women (Fig. 2Go), and the decrease was proportionately greater in women younger than 50 years of age than in older women (Fig. 4Go). For black women, the most recent death rates did not continue to increase, in contrast to the 1.3% annual increase between 1973 and 1991 (Fig. 2Go). Among black women, age-specific declines in death rates occurred among women younger than 75 years of age and were statistically significant only among women younger than 50 years of age.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Female breast cancer death rates by age and race, 1973 through 1998. Death data are from the National Center for Health Statistics covering the entire U.S. population. Rates are per 100 000 females and are age-adjusted to the 1970 U.S. standard million population.

 
Breast cancer was the most common cancer diagnosed among women in all five racial and ethnic populations studied (Fig. 5Go). It was the leading cause of cancer death among Hispanic women and was second to lung cancer among all other racial and ethnic female groups (Fig. 5Go). Across these populations, the breast cancer death rate was highest among black women. State-specific breast cancer incidence rates varied among white women (from 95.8 in West Virginia to 130.8 in Hawaii) and among black women (from 71.2 in New Mexico to 120.0 in the Atlanta metropolitan area) (Table 3Go). Breast cancer death rates for white women ranged from 20.1 in Colorado to 27.1 in New Jersey, while rates for black women were higher, ranging from 23.2 in Nevada to 38.9 in Washington, DC (Table 4Go).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Cancer incidence and death rates by site and race/ethnicity, 1992 through 1998. Rates are per 100 000 persons and are age-adjusted to the 1970 U.S. standard million population. Incidence data are from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program areas covering 14% of the U.S. population. Death data are from the National Center for Health Statistics covering the entire U.S. population. A) Whites. B) Blacks. C) Asian and Pacific Islanders. D) American Indians and Alaska Natives. E) Hispanics. Hispanic is not mutually exclusive from whites, blacks, American Indians/Alaska Natives, and Asian/Pacific Islanders. #Rates are based on sex-specific data. NOS = not otherwise specified; ONS = other nervous system; IBD = intrahepatic bile duct.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Average annual cancer incidence rates for selected cancer sites by sex, race, and selected states and geographic areas, 1994 through 1998*
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Average annual cancer death rates for selected cancer sites by sex, race, and state, 1994 through 1998*
 
Prostate (5.9% of deaths; 14.8% of cases). After a 2.9% annual increase in prostate cancer since 1973, a steeper increase began in 1988 with the introduction of serologic screening for prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Subsequently, incidence rates declined by 5.7% per year in white males from 1992 through 1998 (Table 1Go). Analysis of long-term trends suggested that the recent decline was not monotonic; there was an 11.3% annual decrease from 1992 through 1995 and a leveling of rates between 1995 and 1998. In black males, incidence declined by 4.0% per year throughout the 7-year period. Among the five racial and ethnic populations, the incidence rate was highest among black males and lowest among AI/AN males (Fig. 5Go).

Death rates from prostate cancer have varied over time (Table 2Go). Among white men, prostate cancer death rates increased by 0.7% per year from 1973 through 1987, climbed by 2.9% per year between 1987 and 1991, stabilized between 1991 and 1994, and then declined by 4.7% per year through 1998. Among black men, death rates increased by 1.7% per year from 1973 to 1988 and 2.6% per year from 1988 to 1993, then declined by 3.0% per year through 1998 (Table 2Go).

Prostate cancer incidence and mortality varied widely by race/ethnicity and geographic region (Tables 3 and 4GoGo). Prostate cancer ranked first in incidence and second to lung cancer as the most common cause of cancer death among men across all five racial and ethnic populations (Fig. 5Go). The incidence rates ranged from 101.0 among white males in Kentucky to 262.6 among black males in the Atlanta metropolitan area (Table 3Go). For mortality, the U.S. rate was 21.7 in white males, ranging from 18.7 in Alaska to 25.9 in Wyoming (Table 4Go). Many states with the highest rates in white males clustered in the north central part of the United States (Wyoming, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Montana, Idaho, North Dakota, and South Dakota). Among black men, the death rates ranged from a low of 34.1 in Nevada to 64.2 in Delaware (Table 4Go). Most of the states with the highest death rates in black men were in the southeastern part of the United States (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Tennessee, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina).

Lung (28.5% of deaths; 13.2% of cases). Overall, lung cancer incidence decreased 1.6% per year between 1992 and 1998 (Table 1Go), because of a decline in incidence among men (2.7% per year) and a leveling off of the rates among women. Long-term trends illustrate that women have lagged behind men in lung cancer incidence (Table 1Go) and mortality (Table 2Go). Lung cancer incidence rates began to decrease in 1981 in men but continued to increase until 1991 in women. Lung cancer mortality began to decrease in 1990 in men, but it continued to increase to at least 1998 in women. For 1992 through 1998, the death rate decreased by 1.9% per year among men, but it increased by 0.8% per year among women (Table 2Go). Lung cancer incidence and mortality in women showed a gradual slowing in the rates of increase over the past three decades.

Among men, the death rate from lung cancer for 1992 through 1998 exceeded that from other cancers in all five racial and ethnic populations (Fig. 5Go). The death rates ranged from 30.5 in Hispanic males and 33.8 in API males to 96.2 in black males. Among women, lung cancer was the leading cause of cancer mortality, except among Hispanics. The death rates ranged from 10.9 in Hispanic females to 34.6 in white females (Fig. 5Go). Sex- and race-specific lung cancer incidence and death rates also varied widely across states (Tables 3 and 4GoGo). Incidence rates were lowest among white females in Utah (19.2) and highest among black males in Wisconsin (149.0) (Table 3Go). Death rates ranged from 14.1 among white females in Utah to 123.4 among black males in Wisconsin (Table 4Go).

Colon–rectum (10.5% of deaths; 11.6% of cases). Colorectal cancer was among the top four cancers in five racial/ethnic populations during 1992 through 1998 (Fig. 5Go). Colorectal cancer rates ranged from 22.8 in the black population to 10.2 in the Hispanic population. Incidence rates for white males declined by 1.3% per year from 1992 through 1998 and remained constant for black males, black females, and white females over this time (Table 1Go). The long-term incidence rates of colorectal cancer in all persons increased until 1985, decreased 1.8% per year through 1995, and then stabilized through 1998 (Table 1Go). The ascending colon was the only colon subsite with increasing incidence rates during 1992 through 1998, primarily because of a 1.5% annual increase in females (data not shown). Death rates from colorectal cancer decreased from 1992 through 1998 in white males, white females, and black males, whereas rates in black females were stable. In the long-term trends, the decrease in death rates began earlier in women than in men and was larger in white than in black populations (Table 2Go).

Other Sites With Increasing Trends

In addition to the recent rise in female breast cancer incidence rates and in the long-term increase in female lung cancer death rates, an increase in either incidence or mortality rates has been observed for 10 other cancer sites. These include NHL, melanoma, and cancer of the liver and intrahepatic bile duct (IBD), as well as relatively rare tumor types, such as cancers of the vulva and of the peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery. The results for each cancer are described in descending order of their contribution to total cancer deaths.

NHL (4.3% of deaths; 4.0% of cases). From 1992 through 1998, NHL incidence rates increased among black females (Table 1Go), primarily among those younger than 65 years old (data not shown). For all males, incidence rates were stable during the 7-year period (Table 1Go). The long-term trends in incidence rates increased from 1973 through 1998 by 3.0% per year for black females; incidence rates for white females increased by the same APC through 1988 but then slowed to an increase of 1.3% per year for the next 10 years. Incidence rates in black males increased 4.1% annually from 1973 through 1998; those in white males increased 2.4% per year in the 1970s, accelerated to an increase of 5.0% per year in the 1980s, and slowed to a 1.7% annual increase from 1988 through 1995, when the trend reversed to a decline of 3.3% per year from 1995 through 1998 (Table 1Go). During 1992 through 1998, death rates increased for white males and black females (Table 2Go). Analysis of long-term death rates in white males suggested that rates increased from 1977 through 1994 and were stable from 1994 through 1998 (Table 2Go).

Liver and IBD (2.3% of deaths; 1.2% of cases). From 1992 through 1998, the incidence rates of liver and IBD cancer increased among all males and females, and the magnitude of the rates was consistently higher in males than in females and in black populations than in white populations (Table 1Go). Death rates during this time also increased in males (all, white, and black) and in females (all and white) (Table 2Go). The recent increases in both incidence rates and death rates were part of a long-term pattern of increasing rates for this cancer (Tables 1 and 2GoGo). The incidence rates of cancer of the liver and IBD were 11.5 among API, 6.1 among Hispanic, 5.6 among AI/AN, 5.1 among blacks, and 3.4 among whites populations (Fig. 5Go).

Esophagus (2.2% of deaths; 0.9% of cases). The overall death rate from cancer of the esophagus increased from 1992 through 1998 because of a 1.6% annual increase in white men; however, rates in black men and in black women decreased over this period (Table 2Go). Trends in the incidence rates of esophageal cancer during 1992 through 1998 differed by sex and race, with incidence rates decreasing among black men and remaining stable among other groups (Table 1Go). The incidence rates and death rates in black persons were nearly twice those in white persons (Fig. 5Go). The rates among API, AI/AN, and Hispanic populations were lower than the rate in the white population and were nearly the same among the three groups. Similar racial and ethnic patterns were observed in death rates (Fig. 5Go).

The histologic distribution of esophageal cancer has also changed, influencing the overall trends of this cancer (data available on the Internet; see "Subjects and Methods" section). The incidence rates of squamous cell carcinoma of the upper esophagus have decreased gradually since the late 1970s, although they are higher in black than in white Americans and in men than in women. In contrast, the incidence rates of adenocarcinoma, which occurs in the lower esophagus near the gastroesophageal junction, have increased more steeply than those of any other cancer among men of both races (15).

Melanoma (1.4% of deaths; 3.5% of cases). From 1992 through 1998, the incidence rates of melanoma increased an average of 2.7% per year and 2.9% per year for both white males and white females, respectively (Table 1Go). The death rates during this period increased more slowly for white males (1.0% annually) and were stable for white females (Table 2Go). Melanoma is rare among black, API, AI/AN, and Hispanic populations.

Analyses of long-term trends in the incidence rates of melanoma indicated that sharp increases occurred in white males and white females from 1973 until the 1980s that were then followed by slower increases (Table 1Go). The rates of death from melanoma among white males rose by 2.6% per year from 1973 through 1987 and then by 0.8% annually from 1987 through 1998. Among white females, death rates increased by 3.2% per year in the 1970s and then stabilized through 1998 (Table 2Go).

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (1.3% of deaths; 0.8% of cases). From 1992 through 1998, the incidence of AML increased by 1.8% per year for all males (Table 1Go), with most of the increase occurring in males who were 65 years old or older (data not shown). This recent pattern was part of a longer trend of increasing rates since the late 1980s in white males. Data were insufficient to assess trends in death rates because of the lack of specificity of leukemias on the death certificate.

Soft (connective) tissue including heart (0.7% of deaths; 0.6% of cases). The designation of soft tissue refers to the anatomic site and not to the type of tumor. Although more than 90% of soft-tissue tumors are soft-tissue sarcomas, sarcomas of specific sites are classified to the specific anatomic site and not to soft tissue. The incidence rate of cancers of the soft tissue, including heart, increased 3.3% per year among white females from 1992 through 1998, while that for the other race–sex groups were stable (Table 1Go). Death rates increased during this period for white females (1.3% annually) and black males (3.7% annually) (Table 2Go). The long-term incidence trend in all persons increased 0.5% annually from 1973 through 1990 and accelerated to increase by 2.4% per year from 1990 through 1998. In contrast, the long-term mortality trend increased by 12.7% annually in all persons from 1976 through 1979 and then slowed to a 1.3% annual increase through 1998.

Thyroid (0.4% of deaths; 1.5% of cases). The incidence rates for thyroid cancer for 1992 through 1998 were 2.5 times higher in women than in men. The overall incidence rate of thyroid cancer increased 2.7% per year during 1992 through 1998, reflecting annual increases in white (3.9%) and black (2.8%) women (Table 1Go). The increases occurred among 20- to 54-year-old females of both races and older white females (data not shown). Long-term trends of incidence rates in white women increased 1.1% per year from 1973 through 1988 and then accelerated to increase by 3.6% per year through 1998. Rates for black females were stable through 1988, at which time the rates began to increase by 4.1% per year through 1998. Death rates remained level during the recent 7-year period (Table 2Go); however, among white males, long-term death rates have increased by 0.8% annually from 1983 through 1998. The lowest incidence rates occurred in black persons (3.0) and in AI/AN populations (3.1), the highest rate was among the API population (6.7), and white persons had intermediate rates (5.4). All of the racial and ethnic groups had low mortality rates.

Small intestine (0.2% of deaths; 0.3% of cases). The incidence rates of cancer of the small intestine increased, whereas the death rate decreased, in women from 1992 through 1998 (Tables 1 and 2GoGo). Long-term increases in both incidence and death rates were evident among men and women from 1973 through 1998, with the average annual increase in incidence rates more than five times larger than the increase in death rates. Long-term incidence rates increased for men and women (Table 1Go) and for both adenocarcinoma and carcinoid neoplasms (histologic data not shown).

Vulva (0.1% of deaths; 0.3% of cases). The incidence rates for cancer of the vulva increased 2.4% per year from 1992 through 1998 (Table 1Go). The increase occurred predominantly among females younger than age 65 years (data not shown) and involved both squamous cell tumors and tumors of other epithelial origin. Trends in the death rates from vulvar cancer were more variable than incidence trends (Table 2Go); death rates decreased from the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s and then remained stable through 1998. Examination of the trend from the mid-1980s to 1998 by race revealed death rates increasing in white women and decreasing in black women.

Peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery (0.1% of deaths; 0.1% of cases). The incidence rates for cancers of the peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery increased in white women by 14.9% per year from 1992 through 1998 (Table 1Go). Data were insufficient to assess incidence trends during 1992 through 1998 in black females, white males, and black males. An increase of similar magnitude was seen in the death rates for white females for this same 7-year period (Table 2Go). The recent increases in both incidence rates and death rates were part of long-term increases since 1973 that accelerated after 1988 (Tables 1 and 2GoGo).


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Notes
 Discussion
 References
 
Major Cancer Sites

Breast. Reasons for the recent (1992 through 1998) increase in breast cancer incidence rates may signify increased screening and early detection, since the increase was limited to early-stage disease. The increase was greatest among white women who were 50–64 years old, the population in whom mammography has been used most effectively to detect early-stage tumors (16,17). The increase in stage II lymph node-positive disease that began in 1994 may reflect changes in surgical examination of axillary lymph nodes and pathologic techniques. It is not known whether any of the increase in incidence was due to age and birth cohort changes in reproductive patterns (delayed childbearing and having fewer children) (1820), recent hormone use (2123), increases in obesity (24,25), or other, as yet unknown, risk factors.

The death rate from breast cancer continues to decline because of improvements in early detection and treatment. Regular mammography screening, which can detect early-stage breast cancers, reduces cancer mortality by about 16% for women 40–49 years old and 25%–30% for women 50–69 years old (26). Clinical trials have demonstrated that 5-year treatment with tamoxifen reduces regional recurrence and the occurrence of contralateral tumors by about 50% (27). Tamoxifen is also beneficial as adjuvant therapy for estrogen receptor-positive tumors (28). Adjuvant therapy with polychemotherapy improves survival, particularly if it includes anthracycline-containing regimens (28). Clinical trials (2932) have also shown that adjuvant radiotherapy reduces local recurrence and improves survival among breast cancer patients with four or more axillary lymph nodes involved.

Prostate. Following large increases in prostate cancer incidence due to the introduction of PSA screening in the late 1980s, the incidence trend has been stable from 1995 through 1998, while death rates have continued to decline for both white males and black males. Much of the geographic variation in prostate cancer incidence rates reflects differences in PSA screening (33,34), with regions of high PSA screening penetration having higher incidence rates, often because of the discovery of clinically insignificant tumors. The correlation between prostate cancer incidence and death rates across states is low (r = .32; P = .11, not statistically significant) in white men, illustrating the probable influence that PSA screening has on the magnitude of the prostate cancer incidence rate (3436).

The impact of PSA screening on mortality is not yet known because other changes have occurred concurrently, such as the shift to earlier stages of disease at diagnosis and the concomitant revised recommendations to treat early-stage disease more aggressively, including with both hormone therapy and surgery or radiation therapy. Clinical trials conducted during the past 10 years have demonstrated the efficacy of hormones in extending disease-free survival, despite the competing risks for mortality from other diseases in the older aged population of men with prostate cancer (3740).

Lung. The decrease in lung cancer incidence and death rates in men and the slowing of the increase in women reflect reductions in tobacco smoking since the 1960s (41,42). During the period from 1991 through 1998, lung cancer death rates in women increased less rapidly than during earlier periods. Trends in incidence and death rates from lung cancer in women have followed the same patterns observed among men: Rates declined first among young women, remained level in women aged 60–69 years, and increased among older women (2). These trends follow the onset of regular cigarette smoking (and later, lung cancer) at younger ages, with progression of the lung cancer epidemic as birth cohorts age (43).

Colon–rectum. Following a long-term decline that began in the mid-1980s, incidence rates of colon–rectum cancer were essentially stable from 1995 through 1998. Increased use of effective early-detection methods, such as fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and barium enema, increases incidence in the short run and subsequently decreases mortality. However, because these tests can detect precancerous polyps and early-stage carcinomas, it is difficult to separate the effects of screening from true changes in the incidence of colorectal cancer. The full benefit of effective screening for colorectal cancer will only be realized if existing screening tools are widely used; currently, they are underutilized (44).

Whereas from 1992 through 1998, the incidence rate for all cancers of the colon–rectum were stable, rates for cancer of the ascending colon increased. These tumors are beyond the reach of sigmoidoscopy. A shift toward more colon carcinomas of the ascending and transverse colon has been observed in the United States (45) and internationally (46,47). The change in anatomic distribution of colorectal tumors may indicate improvements in diagnosis of these tumors, combined with increased screening by sigmoidoscopy and removal of adenomatous polyps in the descending colon, rather than a true increase in the incidence of ascending colon cancers (47,48).

Colorectal cancer death rates continued to decline, a trend that began in the mid-1980s. For many years, the standard treatment for colorectal cancer after definitive surgery previously was single-agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); however, within the past 10 years, survival has improved with the combination of 5-FU and leucovorin (49). Detection of earlier stages of disease and more effective treatments have led to the decline in death rates.

Other Sites With Increasing Trends

NHL. The etiology of most NHL cases is unknown. Recent analyses (50) describe the biologic and clinical heterogeneity within the NHLs according to histology, suggesting that future epidemiologic investigations focus on NHL risks and causal factors according to subtype. Suspected risk factors include chronic antigenic stimulation of the immune system and immunosuppression, primary or acquired immunodeficiency diseases, and immunosuppression following transplantation. In the 1980s, increases in NHL incidence and mortality in males were associated with the AIDS epidemic. Individuals occupationally exposed to chemicals, and perhaps phenoxy herbicides, also appear to be at increased risk (51). Recent increases in incidence and mortality among women cannot be explained.

Liver and IBD. While liver cancer ranks as the fifth most common cancer in the world (52), it is not a common tumor within the United States. Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) increases the risk of developing liver cancer; this relationship is so strong that it has been determined to be causal. Liver cancer has one of the widest international variations in incidence of any cancer, and this variation correlates with geographic differences in the prevalence of chronic HBV infection (53). For example, immigrants to the United States from Asia have a high prevalence of chronic HBV infection and incidence of liver cancer (53). Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is reputed to be the major cause of liver cancer in areas with low prevalence of chronic HBV infection (53). Some proportion of the increase in liver cancer may also be attributed to HCV infection. Other risk factors for liver cancer include cirrhosis (a consequence of chronic HBV and HCV infections), chronic alcoholism, smoking, aflatoxin exposure, occupational vinyl chloride exposure (causing angiosarcoma of the liver), and oral contraceptive use (53).

Esophagus. The major risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus in the United States are tobacco and alcohol consumption, especially in combination (54). Risk factors for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (55), usually preceded by the precursor lesion Barrett's esophagus (56), are obesity (15), gastroesophageal reflux (57), tobacco smoking (58,59), and perhaps the decreasing prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection (60). Compared with other risk factors, the relative importance of obesity and its increasing prevalence in the U.S. population on the increasing rates of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is not well understood (61,62). Most esophageal carcinomas are detected when the cancer can no longer be resected, which may account for the average survival of less than 1 year from the time of diagnosis (4).

Melanoma. Sunburn at any age is associated with an increased risk of melanoma (63), as is sporadic overexposure to the sun (64). Incidence rates are also higher among persons of higher socioeconomic status, most likely reflecting the association of sun exposure and socioeconomic status (64). A recent analysis (65) shows that, in the 1990s, age-specific incidence rates in women stabilized or declined for tumors at an advanced stage and increased more slowly, compared with rates in the 1970s and 1980s, for tumors of local stage. Earlier detection of melanoma in younger populations could be contributing to the increasing incidence trends.

AML. AML is the most common leukemia and occurs most frequently in young children and in the elderly (66). Cigarette smoking is associated with an increased risk of many types of leukemia (66,67). Exposure to benzene, an established carcinogen in cigarette smoke, is associated with an increased risk of AML (67), as are occupational and environmental exposures to ionizing radiation. Patients treated for multiple myeloma, various lymphomas, and breast and ovarian cancers have an increased risk of AML as a second malignancy, although no increased risk has been reported in cohort studies of children treated for acute lymphocytic leukemia (66). Other less well-known risk factors may include hair dye use in both men and women and infection with human herpesvirus 6 (68).

The increasing trend in incidence observed in this study could be attributable to a residual cohort effect of cigarette smoking in older men. Changes in coding practice and the clinical ability to identify this specific leukemia may also contribute to some of the increase.

Soft (connective) tissue, including heart. Ninety different morphologic types are included in soft-tissue cancers, with nearly all of them sarcomas. These tumors are rare, and it has been difficult to identify risks for any factors other than common etiologic agents, such as genetic susceptibility, ionizing radiation, occupational exposures to certain chemicals, and immunosuppression (69). Some sarcomas, particularly those occurring early in life, are strongly influenced by genetic factors. Still others, such as neural sheath sarcomas, fibrosarcomas, and rhabdomyosarcomas, have both genetic and environmental etiologies (69). Exposure to phenoxy herbicides and related chlorophenols used for wood preservation has been associated with an increased risk of soft-tissue sarcomas (7072). The reasons for incidence increases since 1992 are unknown.

Small intestine. Cancers of the small intestine make up approximately 2% of digestive tract cancers in the United States (73). Their rarity is surprising, given that the small intestine contributes 75% of the length and 90% of the absorptive area of the entire gastrointestinal tract and is one of the most rapidly proliferating tissues in the body (74). It is not known why the incidence rates and rates of death from cancers of the small intestine increased from 1973 through 1998. The long-term trends could partly reflect improved diagnosis, because incidence increased much more steeply than mortality and similar proportional increases occurred in adenocarcinomas of intestinal epithelial cells and enteroendocrine cells (also called carcinoid tumors).

Thyroid. Cancer of the thyroid is relatively uncommon. Five-year relative survival rates are higher than 90%, and death from thyroid cancer is rare. Risk is linked to ionizing radiation (75), to radiation treatment to the head or neck for benign conditions (75) and for Hodgkin's disease in children (76,77), and to radiation exposure among atomic bomb survivors (78). Other possible risk factors include certain benign thyroid diseases (76) and being a Filipino-born person living in the United States (79). Current smokers and alcohol consumers have lower risk than former or never users (80). A recent study (81) suggests that thyroid stimulation during both pregnancy and lactation is associated with a transient increase in the risk of papillary thyroid cancer among younger women.

Long-term survival for thyroid cancer patients is very good; however, it worsens with increasing age at diagnosis. Follicular and papillary carcinomas have the highest incidence in young women but have low mortality; they represent a different disease than anaplastic types or undifferentiated carcinomas, both of which occur among older patients and have high death rates (75). Thus, incidence and mortality statistics may measure these differences. A cause for the recent trend is unknown.

Vulva. The majority of vulva cancers are squamous cell in origin and occur in older women and women of low socioeconomic status (82). Epidemiologic study of this rare tumor is limited and has identified few consistent risk factors, although some evidence exists for a possible role of human papillomavirus and cigarette smoking. Although in situ disease was not the focus of the present report, increasing trends of in situ tumors and level rates of invasive disease for the 1970s and 1980s have been noted by other investigators (82). In the present study, rates of in situ squamous cell tumors in white women increased from 1973 through 1996 and then leveled off. Among black women, rates of in situ squamous cell tumors increased by 7.9% per year from 1973 through 1998. Possible explanations for the observed trends include increased use of biopsy for suspicious vulva lesions, temporal changes in sexual behaviors, or a reporting artifact (83).

Peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery. Primary tumors of the peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery are rare, since cancers in these sites result largely from metastases from other sites (84,85). In females, accurate classification of a peritoneal tumor requires good visualization during surgery to distinguish tumors of the ovary from those of the peritoneum (86). Misclassification of these tumors has been reported (8789). Thus, the increasing incidence trend in females could reflect better classification practices due to a gradual realization and greater understanding of the characterization of primary peritoneal serous tumors and better identification of borderline ovarian and primary mucinous tumors compared with metastatic tumors (86).

Limitations

Some of the statistically significant findings in analyses that test multiple comparisons may be due to chance alone. The analyses in this report examined site-specific trends among all nine combinations of race (all, black, and white) and sex (all, females, and males) and for both incidence (>100 cancers) and mortality (>70 causes of cancer death) and thus could include results that are statistically spurious.

Limitations in the trend statistics must also be considered. The APC assumes that rates increase or decrease at a constant rate over a time interval, an assumption that may not be true. Moreover, results of the JPA are not necessarily comparable to those in last year's annual report (3) because the addition of the 1998 data point may have altered the joinpoints, the direction or magnitude of the APC, or both. The JPA complicates comparisons across different groups that have different joinpoints and years of inflection. Moreover, the JPA is less able to discern changes in trends in the black population because rates are based on fewer cases or deaths than for the white population. However, the JPA is a flexible, and perhaps more accurate, approach than APC in identifying the years in which significant changes in trends occurred.

Another limitation is that, although the NAACCR combined rate covers more than 50% of the U.S. population, it may not reflect the United States as a whole. Progress in achieving nationwide coverage of the U.S. population has been substantial in the last 5 years. It is anticipated that at least 90% of the U.S. population will be covered within the next 5 years by population-based registries meeting quality standards.

Finally, our assessment of long-term cancer trends is limited to white and black populations only. While changing trends for other race and ethnic groups may exist, annual population counts before 1990 for these other populations are not available; thus, annual rates could not be calculated for these years. Furthermore, cancer incidence and death rates for some racial and ethnic populations may be limited by problems in ascertaining race and by the misreporting of race and ethnicity on the basic records from which information is collected on cancer incidence, deaths, and the population at risk (9093). Studies (91,93) suggest that reporting race for the white and black population is generally reliable, but biases are more serious for some smaller populations, particularly American Indians. These biases can affect trends and comparisons among groups.

Strategies for the Future

Although it is encouraging that overall cancer incidence and death rates continue to decline in the United States, measures to sustain this progress must address the entire spectrum of prevention, early detection, and improved treatment and quality of life and must be aimed at reducing mortality among all populations. Except for breast and lung cancers in women, the other 10 cancers that increased in incidence or mortality from 1992 through 1998 are relatively uncommon, making up about 13% of the total cancer incidence and mortality in the United States. Prevention is a key strategy for reducing the national cancer burden. In particular, the single most critical determinant of future cancer incidence and mortality will be the ability to reduce tobacco use in all segments of the population. Effective tobacco reduction requires 1) full-scale, well-funded, sustained efforts to stop smoking initiation in young people and 2) application of effective and state-of-the-art smoking-cessation programs that combine behavioral and pharmacologic approaches to increase the quit rate of tobacco-addicted adults (94,95). Tobacco smoking causes an estimated 30% of cancer deaths (96). Both the avoidance and cessation of smoking effectively reduce the risk of many cancers.

Additional prevention opportunities could substantially reduce the burden from other cancers. For example, although melanoma rates in Australia remain the highest in the world, prevention programs in that country have been conducted for more than 20 years and have been effective in reducing melanoma incidence rates (97). The multistrategy programs address not only individual behaviors (use of protective clothing and sunscreen to limit sun exposure) and social norms (desirability of a suntan), but also social policies that increase sun protection and modify the environment. These social policies include increasing shade in public spaces, planting trees and constructing canopies on playgrounds, reducing workplace exposure, avoiding mid-day scheduling of sport activities, and providing inexpensive sunscreen without sales tax. Protective behavior is encouraged by media depictions of popular role models who demonstrate the recommended behaviors.

Childhood immunization against hepatitis B prevents chronic HBV infection and reduces the incidence of liver cancer (98100). Chronic HBV infection beginning in childhood poses the highest risk of liver cancer. In the United States, most HBV infections occur in adults, yet the small proportion of infections that begin in childhood account for a high proportion of chronic HBV infections. Hepatitis B vaccination has been successfully incorporated into early childhood and adolescent immunizations in the United States. In addition, screening for carriers of {alpha}-fetoprotein has been effective in detecting early-stage liver tumors and in improving survival in an HBV-infected AI/AN population (101). It remains unclear whether screening of other populations would be as effective (102). However, HBV infection is a significant global health problem.

A vaccine to prevent chronic HCV infection is needed, but its development poses major technical challenges due to viral complexity. The illness, mortality, and economic impact associated with HCV infection is projected to be substantial in the next 10–20 years (103). A randomized clinical trial is in progress to evaluate the impact of ribavirin and interferon on reducing progression to cirrhosis and ultimately to liver cancer in individuals infected with hepatitis C.

A second strategy to reduce the cancer burden is to improve use of currently effective but underutilized cancer screening and to develop more effective screening technologies. For example, among the more common cancers, established procedures for early detection of colorectal cancers are underused in all population groups (44). Routine regular screening by mammography should also be increased, especially in women aged 65 years and older. Evidence from successful intervention projects demonstrates that they can be used to achieve higher rates of routine screening; however, the interventions must be more widely applied. A large, randomized clinical trial is currently testing whether digital mammography improves detection over screen-film mammography. New colon cancer-detection technologies now in trials include novel fecal tests to detect cancer markers and virtual or computed tomography (CT)–colonography. Studies are in progress to determine the impact of PSA screening on survival and to clarify clinical guidelines for screening and treatment of prostate cancer. Spiral CT scanning is under evaluation as a screening tool for lung cancer. Information on these and on other clinical trials is available on the Internet (http://cancernet.gov).

Improved early-detection approaches are also needed for less common cancers. Moreover, for many cancers, no effective screening tools are available. For example, early-stage cancers of the ovary are not reliably detected by existing screening tests. Populations at high risk for particular cancers might benefit from screening approaches beyond those recommended for the general population, such as improved approaches to detect adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among persons with Barrett's esophagus. Changes in the anatomic location of certain cancers should be considered in the periodic evaluation of screening practices. The NCI Cancer Genome Anatomy Project has uncovered molecules, proteins, genes, and other biologic substances that may be the earliest warning signs of normal cells turning cancerous. Research priorities are focusing on molecular targets and cancer imaging to identify treatments and early-detection tools that are more effective.

A third strategy is to continue development of state-of-the-art diagnostic procedures and treatment. For breast cancer, trials are in progress of new preventive agents, such as raloxifene, and new therapeutics, such as the taxanes, her-2 neu, and angiogenesis inhibitors. For prostate cancer, a major challenge is to develop imaging techniques and biomarkers that will distinguish the aggressive tumors requiring treatment from those that are clinically insignificant. Techniques, such as cryosurgery, brachytherapy, and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and new drugs for prostate cancer are under active investigation in clinical trials. For colorectal cancer, clinical studies are testing the use of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors for prevention and adjuvant treatment; other new treatments, such as oxaliplatin, monoclonal antibodies, angiogenesis inhibitors, and vaccines, also show promise. Irinotecan has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (104) and is being evaluated in clinical trials for earlier stage disease. Information on these clinical trials is available on the Internet (http://cancernet.gov).

A fourth strategy is to identify and reduce disparities across diverse populations through dissemination of state-of-the-art cancer care to all populations in order to increase survival, improve quality of life, and decrease mortality. Disparities in health and health care can result from socioeconomic factors, in conjunction with factors such as race, ethnicity, culture, and geography (urban–rural), among others. Widespread recognition of the existence of disparities and of the complexities involved in understanding their relation to health has led to more resources and programs to improve prevention, early detection, and treatment in all populations. From a clinical perspective, when diverse populations are included in clinical trials, all participants with equivalent stage of disease and state-of-the-art therapy have similar outcomes, regardless of their sociodemographic characteristics. The challenge is to improve access and use of cancer control measures across diverse populations, goals that have existed for a long time but for which new multifocused approaches are needed. Several national efforts have been initiated to broaden access of diverse patient populations to cancer information and clinical trials. Some examples include the Special Populations Networks for Cancer Awareness Research and Training, a network of institutions that will create and implement cancer control, prevention, treatment, research, and training programs in minority and underserved communities; a revamped national clinical trials program designed to facilitate enrolling patients into clinical trials; and a new national coverage decision from Medicare to cover routine care costs for patients enrolled in clinical trials. Major steps are being taken to make clinical trials more broadly accessible to physicians and patients. Training programs have also begun to increase the diversity of scientists in biomedical research and to enhance existing careers.

Coverage of cancer incidence data has expanded dramatically in the United States in the last decade, and completeness, accuracy, and timeliness have improved since 1995 (5,6,105107). Cancer incidence data are becoming both national (in that they include a greater percentage of the U.S. population) and nationwide (in that local data are increasingly more available for all U.S. locations). A national cancer surveillance system can be more comprehensive, embracing the entire life cycle from birth to death. This surveillance system will be used to address the cancer information needs for healthy populations, newly diagnosed patients, patients receiving treatment, and those living with and dying of the disease. The goal is to use surveillance data in targeting and prioritizing populations so that prevention initiatives, early-detection programs, and research can be effectively focused and so that access to state-of-the-art treatment, quality of life, and palliative care for cancer patients and survivors can be improved.


    NOTES
 
1 An annual percent change (APC) for 1992 through 1998 based on the joinpoint analysis over the interval 1973 through 1998 may differ from an APC for the selected interval of 1992 through 1998 in column 2 of Tables 1 and 2GoGo. Back

We thank Danielle Harkins and Martin Krapcho, Information Management Services, Inc., Silver Spring, MD, for preparing the tables and graphs and Hal Margolis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, for assisting with the liver cancer strategies.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Notes
 Discussion
 References
 

1 Wingo PA, Ries LA, Rosenberg HM, Miller DS, Edwards BK. Cancer incidence and mortality, 1973–1995: a report card for the U.S. Cancer 1998;82:1197–207.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;98165191

2 Wingo PA, Ries LA, Giovino GA, Miller DS, Rosenberg HM, Shopland DR, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1996, with a special section on lung cancer and tobacco smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:675–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;99232873

3 Ries LA, Wingo PA, Miller DS, Howe HL, Weir HK, Rosenberg HM, et al. The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer. Cancer 2000;88:2398–424.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;20283056

4 Ries L, Eisner M, Kosary C, Hankey B, Miller B, Edwards BK, editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1973–97. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2000. NIH Publ No. 00–2789.

5 Cancer registries: the foundation for comprehensive cancer control. At-A-Glance 2000. Atlanta (GA): USDHHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2000.

6 Howe HL, Chen VW, Hotes J, Wu XC, Correa C, editors. Cancer in North America, 1994–1998. Vol. I: Incidence. Springfield (IL): North American Association of Central Cancer Registries; April 2001.

7 Fulton JP, Howe HL. Evaluating the incidence-mortality ratios in estimating completeness of cancer registration. In: Howe HL, editor. Cancer incidence in North America, 1988–1991. Sacramento (CA): North American Association of Central Cancer Registries; April 1995.

8 Howe HL. Conclusions of the work group for high quality criteria for data use. NAACCR Narrative; Winter 2001. p. 8–9.

9 Percy C, Van Holten V, Muir C, editors. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 2nd ed. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 1990.

10 National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics of the United States, 1950–1998. Vol. II: Mortality, parts A and B. Washington (DC): U.S. Public Health Service; 1954–2000.

11 U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare, National Center for Health Statistics. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, adapted for use in the United States. 8th rev. Washington (DC): U.S. Govt Print Off; Public Health Service Publ No. 1693; 1967.

12 World Health Organization. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, based on the recommendations of the ninth revision, conference, 1975. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 1977.

13 Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med 2000;19:335–51.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;20115938

14 Beahrs OH, Henson DE, Hutter RV, Myers MH. Manual for Staging of Cancer. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott, American Joint Committee on Cancer; 1988.

15 Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK. The changing epidemiology of esophageal cancer. Semin Oncol 1999;26(5 Suppl 15):2–8.[Web of Science][Medline]

16 Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH, Yankaskas B, Ernster VL, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, et al. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database. Am J Radiol 1997;169:1001–8.[Free Full Text]

17 Chu KC, Tarone RE, Kessler LG, Ries LA, Hankey BF, Miller BA, et al. Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1571–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;97057516

18 White E. Projected changes in breast cancer incidence due to the trend toward delayed childbearing. Am J Public Health 1987;77:495–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;87154077

19 Kelsey JL. Breast cancer epidemiology: summary and future directions. Epidemiol Rev 1993;15:256–63.[Free Full Text]cancerlit;94009411

20 Hulka BS, Stark AT. Breast cancer: cause and prevention. Lancet 1995;346:883–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;96016246

21 Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Lancet 1997;350:1047–59.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;99228560

22 Colditz GA. Relationship between estrogen levels, use of hormone replacement therapy, and breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:814–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;98286833

23 Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53,297 women with breast cancer and 100,239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies. Lancet 1996;347:1713–27.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;96256403

24 Huang Z, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Manson JE, Rosner B, et al. Waist circumference, waist : hip ratio, and risk of breast cancer in the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:1316–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;20068274

25 Huang Z, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Hunter DJ, Manson JE, et al. Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk. JAMA 1997;278:1407–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;98016075

26 Kerlikowske K. Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute benefit. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997;22:79–86.cancerlit;98374943

27 Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM , et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1371–88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;98418640

28 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1998;351:1451–67.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;98266838

29 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Favourable and unfavourable effects on long-term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2000;355:1757–70.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;20290423

30 Ragaz J, Jackson SM, Le N, Plenderleith IH, Spinelli JJ, Basco VE, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node- positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1997;337:956–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;97441017

31 Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, Rose C, Andersson M, Bach F, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial. N Engl J Med 1997;337:949–55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;97441016

32 Fowble B, Gray R, Gilchrist K, Goodman RL, Taylor S, Tormey DC. Identification of a subgroup of patients with breast cancer and histologically positive axillary nodes receiving adjuvant chemotherapy who may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1988;6:1107–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;88274488

33 Feuer EJ, Merrill RM, Hankey BF. Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer—part II: Cause of death misclassification and the recent rise and fall in prostate cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1025–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;99306633

34 Hankey BF, Feuer EJ, Clegg LX, Hayes RB, Legler JM, Prorok PC, et al. Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer—part I: evidence of the effects of screening in recent prostate cancer incidence, mortality, and survival rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1017–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;99306632

35 Legler JM, Feuer EJ, Potosky AL, Merrill RM, Kramer BK. The role of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing patterns in the recent prostate cancer incidence decline in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 1998;9:519–27.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;99131416

36 Etzioni R, Legler JM, Feuer EJ, Merrill RM, Cronin K, Hankey BF. Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer—part III: Quantifying the link between population prostate-specific antigen testing and recent declines in prostate cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1033–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;99306634

37 Pilepich MV, Caplan R, Byhardt RW, Lawton CA, Gallagher MJ, Mesic JB, et al. Phase III trial of androgen suppression using goserelin in unfavorable-prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy: report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 85–31. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:1013–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;97213852

38 Bolla M, Gonzalez D, Warde P, Dubois JB, Mirimanoff RO, Storme G, et al. Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin. N Engl J Med 1997;337:295–300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;97365038

39 Zagars GK, Johnson DE, von Eschenbach AC, Hussey DH. Adjuvant estrogen following radiation therapy for stage C adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results of a prospective randomized study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988;14:1085–91.[Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;88256769

40 Granfors T, Modig H, Damber JE, Tomic R. Combined orchiectomy and external radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for nonmetastatic prostate cancer with or without pelvic lymph node involvement: a prospective randomized study. J Urol 1998;159:2030–4.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;98258459

41 Shopland DR. Tobacco use and its contribution to early cancer mortality with a special emphasis on cigarette smoking. Environ Health Perspect 1995;103(Suppl 8):131–42.

42 Tolley HD, Crane L, Shipley N. Smoking prevalence and lung cancer death rates. In: Strategies to control tobacco use in the United States— a blueprint for public health action in the 1990s. Smoking and tobacco control monograph No. 1. Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1992: NIH Publ No. 92–3316.

43 Burns DM, Lee L, Shen LZ, Gilpin E, Tolley HD, Vaughn J, et al. Cigarette smoking behavior in the United States. In: Changes in cigarette-related disease risks and their implication for prevention and control. Smoking and tobacco control monograph No. 8. Bethesda (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1997: NIH Publ No. 97–4213.

44 Trends in screening for colorectal cancer—United States, 1997 and 1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;50:162–6.[Medline]

45 Troisi RJ, Freedman AN, Devesa SS. Incidence of colorectal carcinoma in the U.S.: an update of trends by gender, race, age, subsite, and stage, 1975–1994. Cancer 1999;85:1670–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;99238070

46 Thorn M, Bergstrom R, Kressner U, Sparen P, Zack M, Ekbom A. Trends in colorectal cancer incidence in Sweden 1959–93 by gender, localization, time period, and birth cohort. Cancer Causes Control 1998;9:145–52.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;98237402

47 Stewart RJ, Stewart AW, Turnbull PR, Isbister WH. Sex differences in subsite incidence of large-bowel cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:658–60.[Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;83286903

48 Schub R, Steinheber FU. Rightward shift of colon cancer. A feature of the aging gut. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986;8:630–4.[Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;87110482

49 O'Connell MJ, Mailliard JA, Kahn MJ, Macdonald JS, Haller DG, Mayer RJ, et al. Controlled trial of fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months as postoperative adjuvant therapy for colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:246–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;97149341

50 Groves FD, Linet MS, Travis LB, Devesa SS. Cancer surveillance series: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma incidence by histologic subtype in the United States from 1978 through 1995. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1240–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;20382808

51 Scherr PA, Mueller NE. Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 920–45.

52 Bosch FX, Ribes J. Epidemiology of liver cancer in Europe. Can J Gastroenterol 2000;14:621–30.[Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;20436259

53 London WT, McGlynn KA. Liver cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 772–93.

54 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing the health consequences of smoking: 25 years of progress. A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 1989: DHHS Publ No. (CDC)89–8411; 1989.

55 Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 1998;83:2049–53.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;99043409

56 Montesano R, Hainaut P, Hall J. The use of biomarkers to study pathogenesis and mechanisms of cancer: oesophagus and skin cancer as models. In: Toniolo P, Boffetta P, Shuker D, Rothman N, Hulka B, Pearce N, editors. Application of biomarkers in cancer epidemiology. Lyon (France): IARC Scientific Publications; 1997. p. 291–301.

57 Chow WH, Finkle WD, McLaughlin JK, Frankl H, Ziel HK, Fraumeni JF Jr. The relation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its treatment to adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA 1995;274:474–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;95356318

58 Gammon M, Schoenberg JB, Ahsan H, Risch H, Vaughan T, Chow WH, et al. Tobacco, alcohol, and socioeconomic status and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:1277–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;97438143

59 Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, Nyren O. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1999;340:825–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;99165315

60 Chow WH, Blaser MJ, Blot WJ, Gammon MD, Vaughan TL, Risch HA, et al. An inverse relation between cagA+ strains of Helicobacter pylori infection and risk of esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 1998;58:588–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;98143534

61 Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:15–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

62 Mokdad A, Serdula M, Dietz WH, Bowman B, Marks JS, Koplan J. The spread of the obesity epidemic in the United States, 1991–1998. JAMA 1999;282:1519–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

63 Elwood JM, Jopson J. Melanoma and sun exposure: an overview of published studies. Int J Cancer 1997;73:198–203.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;97474418

64 English DR, Armstrong BK, Kricker A, Fleming C. Sunlight and cancer. Cancer Causes Control 1997;8:271–83.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;98141140

65 Jemal A, Devesa SS, Hartge P, Tucker MA. Cancer surveillance series: recent trends in cutaneous melanoma incidence among whites in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:678–83.

66 Linet MS, Cartwright RA. The leukemias. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press, 1996; p. 841–92.

67 Korte JE, Hertz-Picciotto I, Schulz MR, Ball LM, Duell EJ. The contribution of benzene to smoking-induced leukemia. Environ Health Perspect 2000;108:333–9.[Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;20216893

68 Gentile G, Mele A, Ragona G, Faggioni A, Zompetta C, Tosti ME, et al. Human herpes virus-6 seroprevalence and leukaemias: a case–control study. GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell' Adulto). Br J Cancer 1999;80:1103–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;99288970

69 Mack TM. Sarcomas and other malignancies of soft tissue, retroperitoneum, peritoneum, pleura, heart, mediastinum, and spleen. Cancer 1995;75(1 Suppl):211–44. [CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

70 Wingren G, Fredrikson M, Brage HN, Nordenskjold B, Axelson O. Soft tissue sarcoma and occupational exposures. Cancer 1990;66: 806–11.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;90352515

71 Eriksson M, Hardell L, Adami HO. Exposure to dioxins as a risk factor for soft tissue sarcoma: a population-based case–control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:486–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;90189211

72 Lynge E. Cancer in phenoxy herbicide manufacturing workers in Denmark, 1947–87—an update. Cancer Causes Control 1993;4:261–72.[Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;93305871

73 Barquist E, Zinner M. Neoplasms of the small intestine, vermiform appendix, and peritoneum. In: Bast RC, Kufe DW, Pollack RE, et al, editors. Cancer medicine. Hamilton (ON): B. C. Decker; 2000. p. 1465–71.

74 Schottenfeld D, Islam SS. Cancers of the small intestine. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 806–12.

75 Ron E. Thyroid cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 1000–21.

76 Mack WJ, Preston-Martin S, Bernstein L, Qian D, Xiang M. Reproductive and hormonal risk factors for thyroid cancer in Los Angeles County females. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:991–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;20030830

77 Sklar C, Whitton J, Mertens A, Stovall M, Green D, Marina N, et al. Abnormalities of the thyroid in survivors of Hodgkin's disease: data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:3227–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;20452442

78 Thompson DE, Mabuchi K, Ron E, Soda M, Tokunaga M, Ochikubo S, et al. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part II: Solid tumors, 1958–1987. Radiat Res 1994;137(2 Suppl):S17–67.[Web of Science][Medline]

79 Rossing MA, Schwartz SM, Weiss NS. Thyroid cancer incidence in Asian migrants to the United States and their descendants. Cancer Causes Control 1995;6:439–44.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;96058508

80 Rossing MA, Cushing KL, Voigt LF, Wicklund KG, Daling JR. Risk of papillary thyroid cancer in women in relation to smoking and alcohol consumption. Epidemiology 2000;11:49–54.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;20081589

81 Rossing MA, Voigt LF, Wicklund KG, Daling JR. Reproductive factors and risk of papillary thyroid cancer in women. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:765–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;20419157

82 Daling JR, Sherman KJ. Cancers of the vulva and vagina. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 1117–29.

83 Sturgeon SR, Brinton LA, Devesa SS, Kurman RJ. In situ and invasive vulvar cancer incidence trends (1973 to 1987). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1482–5.[Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;92280933

84 Healy JC, Reznek RH. The peritoneum, mesenteries and omenta: normal anatomy and pathological processes. Eur Radiol 1998;8:886–900.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;98350214

85 Hamrick-Turner JE, Chiechi MV, Abbitt PL, Ros PR. Neoplastic and inflammatory processes of the peritoneum, omentum, and mesentery: diagnosis with CT. Radiographics 1992;12:1051–68.[Abstract]cancerlit;93067294

86 Weiss N, Cook LS, Farrow DC, Rosenblatt KA. Ovarian cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 1040–57.

87 McGowan L, Norris HJ. The mistaken diagnosis of carcinoma of the ovary. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;173:211–5.[Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;92022930

88 Scully RE, Salazar H. Problems in the histological typing of ovarian cancer. In: Stalsberg H, editor. An international survey of distributions of histologic types of tumours of the testis and ovary. Vol 75. Geneva (Switzerland); UICC Technical Report Series; 1983. p. 123–35.

89 Gitsch G, Tabery U, Feigl W, Breitenecker G. The differential diagnosis of primary peritoneal papillary tumors. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1992;251:139–44.[Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;92296822

90 National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics of the United States, 1994. Vol. II, Part A: Mortality, "Technical Appendix." Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 1994.

91 Rosenberg HM, Maurer JD, Sorlie PD, Johnson NJ, MacDorman MF, Hoyert DL, et al. Quality of death rates by race and Hispanic origin: a summary of current research, 1999. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, No. 128. September 1999.

92 Poe GS, Powell-Griner E, McLaughlin JK, Placek PJ, Thompson GB, Robinson K. Comparability of the death certificate and the 1986 National Mortality Followback Survey. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 1993;2:118.

93 Hogan, H. The 1990 post-enumeration survey: operations and results. J Am Stat Assoc 1993;88:1047–60.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

94 Reducing tobacco use: a report of the Surgeon General. MMWR Recommendations and Reports December 22, 2000;49(RR16):1–27.

95 A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: a U.S. Public Health Service Report. JAMA 2000;283:3244–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

96 Doll R, Peto R. The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst 1981;66:1191–308.cancerlit;81219022

97 Marks R. Melanoma prevention: is it possible to change a population's behavior in the sun? Pigment Cell Res 1994;7:104–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;94344879

98 Hsu HM, Lu CF, Lee SC, Lin SR, Chen DS. Seroepidemiologic survey for hepatitis B virus infection in Taiwan: the effect of hepatitis B mass immunization. J Infect Dis 1999;179:367–70.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

99 Harpaz R, McMahon BJ, Margolis HS, Shapiro CN, Havron D, Carpenter G, et al. Elimination of new chronic hepatitis B virus infections: result of the Alaska immunization program. J Infect Dis 2000;181:413–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

100 Chang MH, Chen CJ, Lai MS, Hsu HM, Wu TC, Kong MS, et al. Universal hepatitis B vaccination in Taiwan and the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in children. Taiwan Childhood Hepatoma Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1855–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;97324061

101 McMahon BJ, Bulkow L, Harpster A, Snowball M, Lanier A, Sacco F, et al. Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in Alaska natives infected with chronic hepatitis B: a 16-year population-based study. Hepatology 2000;32:842–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;20459038

102 Margolis HS, Coleman PJ, Brown RE, Mast EE, Shinengold SH, Arevalo JA. Prevention of hepatitis B virus transmission by vaccination. An economic analysis of current recommendations. JAMA 1995;274:1201–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

103 Wong JB, McQuillan GM, McHutchison JG, Poynard T. Estimating future hepatitis C morbidity, mortality, and costs in the United States. Am J Public Health 2000;90:1562–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;20484437

104 Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, Rosen LS, Fehrenbacher L, Moore MJ, et al. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000;343:905–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]cancerlit;20441395

105 Swan J, Wingo PA, Clive R, West D, Miller D, Hutchison C, et al. Cancer surveillance in the U.S.: can we have a national system? Cancer 1998;83:1282–91.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]cancerlit;98433891

106 Hankey BF, Ries LA, Edwards BK. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program: a national resource. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:1117–21.[Free Full Text]cancerlit;20078508

107 Miller M, Swan J. SEER doubles coverage by adding registries for four states [news]. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:500.[Free Full Text]cancerlit;21184566

Manuscript received January 31, 2001; revised April 25, 2001; accepted April 26, 2001.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Markopoulos, A. Polychronis, U. Dafni, D. Koukouras, V. Zobolas, E. Tzorakoleftherakis, G. Xepapadakis, and H. Gogas
Lipid changes in breast cancer patients on exemestane treatment: final results of the TEAM Greek substudy
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 49 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. Jemal, M. J. Thun, L. A. G. Ries, H. L. Howe, H. K. Weir, M. M. Center, E. Ward, X.-C. Wu, C. Eheman, R. Anderson, et al.
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2005, Featuring Trends in Lung Cancer, Tobacco Use, and Tobacco Control
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 3, 2008; 100(23): 1672 - 1694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. Nan, T. Niu, D. J. Hunter, and J. Han
Missense Polymorphisms in Matrix Metalloproteinase Genes and Skin Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2008; 17(12): 3551 - 3557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
L. D. Sjo, E. Ralfkiaer, J. U. Prause, J. H. Petersen, J. Madsen, N. T. Pedersen, and S. Heegaard
Increasing Incidence of Ophthalmic Lymphoma in Denmark from 1980 to 2005
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 3283 - 3288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Garbe, P. Radny, R. Linse, R. Dummer, R. Gutzmer, J. Ulrich, R. Stadler, M. Weichenthal, TK. Eigentler, U. Ellwanger, et al.
Adjuvant low-dose interferon {alpha}2a with or without dacarbazine compared with surgery alone: a prospective-randomized phase III DeCOG trial in melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1195 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
N. Krieger
Hormone therapy and the rise and perhaps fall of US breast cancer incidence rates: critical reflections
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 37(3): 627 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
W. Dong, D. A. Berry, T. B. Bevers, S.-W. Kau, L. Hsu, R. L. Theriault, and Y. Shen
Prognostic Role of Detection Method and Its Relationship with Tumor Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1096 - 1103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
F Frasca, C Nucera, G Pellegriti, P Gangemi, M Attard, M Stella, M Loda, V Vella, C Giordano, F Trimarchi, et al.
BRAF(V600E) mutation and the biology of papillary thyroid cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2008; 15(1): 191 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
J. Si, J. Behar, J. Wands, D. G. Beer, D. Lambeth, Y. Eugene Chin, and W. Cao
STAT5 mediates PAF-induced NADPH oxidase NOX5-S expression in Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma cells
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): G174 - G183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
J. R. Lange and C. M. Balch
Melanoma in Older Patients
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 399 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
K. J. Vogel, D. P. Atchley, J. Erlichman, K. R. Broglio, K. J. Ready, V. Valero, C. I. Amos, G. N. Hortobagyi, K. H. Lu, and B. Arun
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genetic Testing in Hispanic Patients: Mutation Prevalence and Evaluation of the BRCAPRO Risk Assessment Model
J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2007; 25(29): 4635 - 4641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Zhou, J. Wulfkuhle, H. Zhang, P. Gu, Y. Yang, J. Deng, J. B. Margolick, L. A. Liotta, E. Petricoin III, and Y. Zhang
Activation of the PTEN/mTOR/STAT3 pathway in breast cancer stem-like cells is required for viability and maintenance
PNAS, October 9, 2007; 104(41): 16158 - 16163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Wang, D. L. Dai, M. Martinka, and G. Li
Prognostic Significance of Nuclear ING3 Expression in Human Cutaneous Melanoma
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 13(14): 4111 - 4116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Loser, J. Apelt, M. Voskort, M. Mohaupt, S. Balkow, T. Schwarz, S. Grabbe, and S. Beissert
IL-10 Controls Ultraviolet-Induced Carcinogenesis in Mice
J. Immunol., July 1, 2007; 179(1): 365 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Thieblemont and B. Coiffier
Lymphoma in Older Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2007; 25(14): 1916 - 1923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. J. Quann, F. Khwaja, K. H. Zavitz, and D. Djakiew
The Aryl Propionic Acid R-Flurbiprofen Selectively Induces p75NTR-Dependent Decreased Survival of Prostate Tumor Cells
Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3254 - 3262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*
Routine Aspirin or Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for the Primary Prevention of Colorectal Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Ann Intern Med, March 6, 2007; 146(5): 361 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Lonn, P. Bhatti, B. H. Alexander, M. A. Pineda, M. M. Doody, J. P. Struewing, and A. J. Sigurdson
Papillary Thyroid Cancer and Polymorphic Variants in TSHR- and RET-Related Genes: a Nested Case-Control Study within a Cohort of U.S. Radiologic Technologists
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 174 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. Han, G. A Colditz, and D. J Hunter
Risk factors for skin cancers: a nested case-control study within the Nurses' Health Study
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2006; 35(6): 1514 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. A. Ganz
Monitoring the Physical Health of Cancer Survivors: A Survivorship-Focused Medical History
J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2006; 24(32): 5105 - 5111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
V. Cokkinides, M. Weinstock, K. Glanz, J. Albano, E. Ward, and M. Thun
Trends in Sunburns, Sun Protection Practices, and Attitudes Toward Sun Exposure Protection and Tanning Among US Adolescents, 1998-2004
Pediatrics, September 1, 2006; 118(3): 853 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. S. Svatek, J. J. Lee, C. G. Roehrborn, S. M. Lippman, and Y. Lotan
The cost of prostate cancer chemoprevention: a decision analysis model.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2006; 15(8): 1485 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Fu, D. G. Beer, J. Behar, J. Wands, D. Lambeth, and W. Cao
cAMP-response Element-binding Protein Mediates Acid-induced NADPH Oxidase NOX5-S Expression in Barrett Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cells
J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2006; 281(29): 20368 - 20382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Q. C. Lau, E. Raja, M. Salto-Tellez, Q. Liu, K. Ito, M. Inoue, T. C. Putti, M. Loh, T. K. Ko, C. Huang, et al.
RUNX3 Is Frequently Inactivated by Dual Mechanisms of Protein Mislocalization and Promoter Hypermethylation in Breast Cancer.
Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 66(13): 6512 - 6520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
H. A. Brandling-Bennett, L. A. Capaldi, B. A. Gilchrest, and A. C. Geller
Improving skin cancer prevention and detection education in US medical schools.
Arch Dermatol, April 1, 2006; 142(4): 524 - 526.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. J. Cho, E. J. Kim, S. S. Lim, M. K. Kim, M.-K. Sung, J.-S. Kim, and J. H. Y. Park
Trans-10,cis-12, Not cis-9,trans-11, Conjugated Linoleic Acid Inhibits G1-S Progression in HT-29 Human Colon Cancer Cells
J. Nutr., April 1, 2006; 136(4): 893 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
K. R. Chapman, D. M. Mannino, J. B. Soriano, P. A. Vermeire, A. S. Buist, M. J. Thun, C. Connell, A. Jemal, T. A. Lee, M. Miravitlles, et al.
Epidemiology and costs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 188 - 207.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
T Mitterlechner, M Fiegl, H Muhlbock, W Oberaigner, S Dirnhofer, and A Tzankov
Epidemiology of non-Hodgkin lymphomas in Tyrol/Austria from 1991 to 2000
J. Clin. Pathol., January 1, 2006; 59(1): 48 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. M. Morton, S. S. Wang, S. S. Devesa, P. Hartge, D. D. Weisenburger, and M. S. Linet
Lymphoma incidence patterns by WHO subtype in the United States, 1992-2001
Blood, January 1, 2006; 107(1): 265 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. Rosenberg, L. A. Wise, J. R. Palmer, N. J. Horton, and L. L. Adams-Campbell
A Multilevel Study of Socioeconomic Predictors of Regular Mammography Use Among African-American Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2628 - 2633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. S. Jung, H. S. Park, I. J. Lee, H. Namkoong, S. M. Shin, G. W. Cho, S.-A. Ha, Y. G. Park, Y. S. Lee, J. Ko, et al.
The HCCR Oncoprotein as a Biomarker for Human Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 11(21): 7700 - 7708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. K. Edwards, M. L. Brown, P. A. Wingo, H. L. Howe, E. Ward, L. A. G. Ries, D. Schrag, P. M. Jamison, A. Jemal, X. C. Wu, et al.
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2002, Featuring Population-Based Trends in Cancer Treatment
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 5, 2005; 97(19): 1407 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Hemminki, C. Eng, and B. Chen
Familial Risks for Nonmedullary Thyroid Cancer
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5747 - 5753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Bosetti, F. Levi, F. Lucchini, E. Negri, and C. L. Vecchia
Lung cancer mortality in European women: recent trends and perspectives
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 1597 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. N. Cormier, Y. Xing, M. Ding, J. E. Lee, P. F. Mansfield, J. E. Gershenwald, M. I. Ross, and X. L. Du
Population-Based Assessment of Surgical Treatment Trends for Patients With Melanoma in the Era of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2005; 23(25): 6054 - 6062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
S. Kedikoglou, K. Syrigos, Y. Skalkidis, F. Ploiarchopoulou, N. Dessypris, and E. Petridou
Implementing clinical protocols in oncology: quality gaps and the learning curve phenomenon
Eur J Public Health, August 1, 2005; 15(4): 368 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
S. M. Ansell and J. Armitage
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Diagnosis and Treatment
Mayo Clin. Proc., August 1, 2005; 80(8): 1087 - 1097.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Delgado, L. M. Martinez, T. T. Sanchez, A. Ramirez, C. Iturria, and G. Gonzalez-Avila
Lung Cancer Pathogenesis Associated With Wood Smoke Exposure
Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 124 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. Cho, B. A. Rosner, and G. A. Colditz
Risk Factors for Melanoma by Body Site
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1241 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Loser, A. Scherer, M. B. W. Krummen, G. Varga, T. Higuchi, T. Schwarz, A. H. Sharpe, S. Grabbe, J. A. Bluestone, and S. Beissert
An Important Role of CD80/CD86-CTLA-4 Signaling during Photocarcinogenesis in Mice
J. Immunol., May 1, 2005; 174(9): 5298 - 5305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. Cho, B. A. Rosner, D. Feskanich, and G. A. Colditz
Risk Factors and Individual Probabilities of Melanoma for Whites
J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2005; 23(12): 2669 - 2675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. F. Aguero, M. M. Facchinetti, Z. Sheleg, and A. M. Senderowicz
Phenoxodiol, a Novel Isoflavone, Induces G1 Arrest by Specific Loss in Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 Activity by p53-Independent Induction of p21WAF1/CIP1
Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 65(8): 3364 - 3373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. L. Schaefer, K. Wada, H. Takahashi, N. Matsuhashi, S. Ohnishi, M. M. Wolfe, J. R. Turner, A. Nakajima, S. C. Borkan, and L. J. Saubermann
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Inhibition Prevents Adhesion to the Extracellular Matrix and Induces Anoikis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells
Cancer Res., March 15, 2005; 65(6): 2251 - 2259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
H. I. M. Mahler, J. A. Kulik, J. Harrell, A. Correa, F. X. Gibbons, and M. Gerrard
Effects of UV Photographs, Photoaging Information, and Use of Sunless Tanning Lotion on Sun Protection Behaviors
Arch Dermatol, March 1, 2005; 141(3): 373 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Bosetti, M. Malvezzi, L. Chatenoud, E. Negri, F. Levi, and C. La Vecchia
Trends in cancer mortality in the Americas, 1970-2000
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2005; 16(3): 489 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. V. Sahani, S. P. Kalva, L. M. Hamberg, P. F. Hahn, C. G. Willett, S. Saini, P. R. Mueller, and T.-Y. Lee
Assessing Tumor Perfusion and Treatment Response in Rectal Cancer with Multisection CT: Initial Observations
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 785 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. Zupi, M. Scarsella, S. C. Semple, M. Mottolese, P. G. Natali, and C. Leonetti
Antitumor Efficacy of bcl-2 and c-myc Antisense Oligonucleotides in Combination with Cisplatin in Human Melanoma Xenografts: Relevance of the Administration Sequence
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1990 - 1998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. Wong, K. Y-Y. Chan, P. F. Macgregor, P. B-S. Lai, J. A. Squire, B. Beheshti, M. Albert, and T. W-T. Leung
Transcriptional Profiling Identifies Gene Expression Changes Associated with IFN-{alpha} Tolerance in Hepatitis C-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 11(3): 1319 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. V. Kamath, A. D. Thor, C. Wang, S. M. Edgerton, A. Slusarczyk, D.J. Leary, J. Wang, E.L. Wiley, B. Jovanovic, Q. Wu, et al.
Perinucleolar Compartment Prevalence Has an Independent Prognostic Value for Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 65(1): 246 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. G. Zapka, S. C. Lemon, E. Puleo, B. Estabrook, R. Luckmann, and S. Erban
Patient Education for Colon Cancer Screening: A Randomized Trial of a Video Mailed before a Physical Examination
Ann Intern Med, November 2, 2004; 141(9): 683 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
A. C. Geller, D. L. O'Riordan, S. A. Oliveria, S. Valvo, M. Teich, and A. C. Halpern
Overcoming Obstacles to Skin Cancer Examinations and Prevention Counseling for High-Risk Patients: Results of a National Survey of Primary Care Physicians
J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2004; 17(6): 416 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
D. Lazovich, J. Forster, G. Sorensen, K. Emmons, J. Stryker, M.-F. Demierre, A. Hickle, and N. Remba
Characteristics Associated With Use or Intention to Use Indoor Tanning Among Adolescents
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2004; 158(9): 918 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. V. Destounis, P. DiNitto, W. Logan-Young, E. Bonaccio, M. L. Zuley, and K. M. Willison
Can Computer-aided Detection with Double Reading of Screening Mammograms Help Decrease the False-Negative Rate? Initial Experience
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 578 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Gohagan, P. Marcus, R. Fagerstrom, P. Pinsky, B. Kramer, and P. Prorok
Baseline Findings of a Randomized Feasibility Trial of Lung Cancer Screening With Spiral CT Scan vs Chest Radiograph: The Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute
Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1): 114 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. S. Simon, W. Du, L. Flaherty, P. A. Philip, P. Lorusso, C. Miree, D. Smith, and D. R Brown
Factors Associated With Breast Cancer Clinical Trials Participation and Enrollment at a Large Academic Medical Center
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2004; 22(11): 2046 - 2052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. C. Lev, A. Onn, V. O. Melinkova, C. Miller, V. Stone, M. Ruiz, E. C. McGary, H. N. Ananthaswamy, J. E. Price, and M. Bar-Eli
Exposure of Melanoma Cells to Dacarbazine Results in Enhanced Tumor Growth and Metastasis In Vivo
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2004; 22(11): 2092 - 2100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. F. Aitken, P. H. Youl, M. Janda, M. Elwood, I. T. Ring, J. B. Lowe, and D. W. Firman
Validity of Self-reported Skin Screening Histories
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 159(11): 1098 - 1105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. A. Sekeres, B. Peterson, R. K. Dodge, R. J. Mayer, J. O. Moore, E. J. Lee, J. Kolitz, M. R. Baer, C. A. Schiffer, A. J. Carroll, et al.
Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes in African Americans and whites with acute myeloid leukemia
Blood, June 1, 2004; 103(11): 4036 - 4042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. M. Facchinetti, A. De Siervi, D. Toskos, and A. M. Senderowicz
UCN-01-Induced Cell Cycle Arrest Requires the Transcriptional Induction of p21waf1/cip1 by Activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Kinase/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathway
Cancer Res., May 15, 2004; 64(10): 3629 - 3637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Braga, R. C. Semelka, R. Pietrobon, D. Martin, N. de Barros, and U. Guller
Does Hypervascularity of Liver Metastases as Detected on MRI Predict Disease Progression in Breast Cancer Patients?
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1207 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J.-P. Coppe, Y. Itahana, D. H. Moore, J. L. Bennington, and P.-Y. Desprez
Id-1 and Id-2 Proteins as Molecular Markers for Human Prostate Cancer Progression
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2004; 10(6): 2044 - 2051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
A. M. Morris, K. G. Billingsley, N. N. Baxter, and L.-M. Baldwin
Racial Disparities in Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Population-Based Analysis
Arch Surg, February 1, 2004; 139(2): 151 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. O. Stuart, W. Wachsman, C. C. Berry, J. Wang-Rodriguez, L. Wasserman, I. Klacansky, D. Masys, K. Arden, S. Goodison, M. McClelland, et al.
In silico dissection of cell-type-associated patterns of gene expression in prostate cancer
PNAS, January 13, 2004; 101(2): 615 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. W. Lee, H. J. Lee, Y.-J. Surh, and C. Y. Lee
Vitamin C and cancer chemoprevention: reappraisal
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2003; 78(6): 1074 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
J. M Herendeen and C. Lindley
Use of NSAIDs for the Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer
Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2003; 37(11): 1664 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. Brown, E. Sigurdson, A. Rogatko, and D. Broccoli
Telomerase Inhibition Using Azidothymidine in the HT-29 Colon Cancer Cell Line
Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 10(8): 910 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
E. A. Collisson, C. Kleer, M. Wu, A. De, S. S. Gambhir, S. D. Merajver, and M. S. Kolodney
Atorvastatin prevents RhoC isoprenylation, invasion, and metastasis in human melanoma cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2003; 2(10): 941 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
K. Monson, D. A. Litvak, and R. J. Bold
Surgery in the Aged Population: Surgical Oncology
Arch Surg, October 1, 2003; 138(10): 1061 - 1067.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
C. K. Chang, I. A. Jacobs, V. M. Vizgirda, and G. I. Salti
Melanoma in the Elderly Patient
Arch Surg, October 1, 2003; 138(10): 1135 - 1138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. A. Collisson, A. De, H. Suzuki, S. S. Gambhir, and M. S. Kolodney
Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma with an Orally Available Inhibitor of the Ras-Raf-MAPK Cascade
Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 63(18): 5669 - 5673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
H. K. Weir, M. J. Thun, B. F. Hankey, L. A. G. Ries, H. L. Howe, P. A. Wingo, A. Jemal, E. Ward, R. N. Anderson, and B. K. Edwards
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2000, Featuring the Uses of Surveillance Data for Cancer Prevention and Control
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 3, 2003; 95(17): 1276 - 1299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
T. Paz-Elizur, M. Krupsky, S. Blumenstein, D. Elinger, E. Schechtman, and Z. Livneh
DNA Repair Activity for Oxidative Damage and Risk of Lung Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 3, 2003; 95(17): 1312 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
D. C. Lev, M. Ruiz, L. Mills, E. C. McGary, J. E. Price, and M. Bar-Eli
Dacarbazine Causes Transcriptional Up-Regulation of Interleukin 8 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Melanoma Cells: A Possible Escape Mechanism from Chemotherapy
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2003; 2(8): 753 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Gorden, I. Osman, W. Gai, D. He, W. Huang, A. Davidson, A. N. Houghton, K. Busam, and D. Polsky
Analysis of BRAF and N-RAS Mutations in Metastatic Melanoma Tissues
Cancer Res., July 15, 2003; 63(14): 3955 - 3957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
F. H. Sarkar, K. M. W. Rahman, and Y. Li
Bax Translocation to Mitochondria Is an Important Event in Inducing Apoptotic Cell Death by Indole-3-Carbinol (I3C) Treatment of Breast Cancer Cells
J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2434S - 2439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. S. Linet, S. Wacholder, and S. H. Zahm
Interpreting Epidemiologic Research: Lessons From Studies of Childhood Cancer
Pediatrics, July 1, 2003; 112(1): 218 - 232.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W. Sienel, S. Dango, U. Woelfle, A. Morresi-Hauf, C. Wagener, J. Brummer, W. Mutschler, B. Passlick, and K. Pantel
Elevated Expression of Carcinoembryonic Antigen-related Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 Promotes Progression of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 9(6): 2260 - 2266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
D. L. Wahner-Roedler, D. F. Nelson, I. T. Croghan, S. J. Achenbach, C. S. Crowson, L. C. Hartmann, and W. M. O'Fallon
Risk of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Characteristics in Women Treated With Supradiaphragmatic Radiation for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Mayo Clinic Experience
Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2003; 78(6): 708 - 715.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. Albers, R. Siener, S. Kliesch, L. Weissbach, S. Krege, C. Sparwasser, H. Schulze, A. Heidenreich, W. de Riese, V. Loy, et al.
Risk Factors for Relapse in Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: Results of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2003; 21(8): 1505 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of School NursingHome page
A. Geller, L. Rutsch, K. Kenausis, and Z. Zhang
Evaluation of the SunWise School Program
The Journal of School Nursing, April 1, 2003; 19(2): 93 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
M.-F. Demierre
Time for the National Legislation of Indoor Tanning to Protect Minors
Arch Dermatol, April 1, 2003; 139(4): 520 - 524.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. K. Koh and D. K. Walker
The Role of State Health Agencies in Cancer Prevention and Control: Lessons Learned from Massachusetts
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2003; 12(3): 261S - 268.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
F. Levi, F. Lucchini, E. Negri, P. Boyle, and C. La Vecchia
Mortality from major cancer sites in the European Union, 1955-1998
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2003; 14(3): 490 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. M. Butler, R. Sinha, R. C. Millikan, C. F. Martin, B. Newman, M. D. Gammon, A. S. Ammerman, and R. S. Sandler
Heterocyclic Amines, Meat Intake, and Association with Colon Cancer in a Population-based Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2003; 157(5): 434 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T.W.T. Leung, S. Yu, P.J. Johnson, J. Geschwind, T.J. Vogl, K. Engelmann, G.J. Gores, M. Giovannini, J. O'Grady, M. Heneghan, et al.
Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Cisplatin-Epinephrine Injectable Gel Administered to Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., February 15, 2003; 21(4): 652 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
K. Glanz, R. T. Croyle, V. Y. Chollette, and V. W. Pinn
Cancer-Related Health Disparities in Women
Am J Public Health, February 1, 2003; 93(2): 292 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. A. Herness and R. K. Naz
A Novel Human Prostate-specific Gene-1 (HPG-1): Molecular Cloning, Sequencing, and Its Potential Involvement in Prostate Carcinogenesis
Cancer Res., January 15, 2003; 63(2): 329 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. I. Li, J. R. Daling, and K. E. Malone
Incidence of Invasive Breast Cancer by Hormone Receptor Status From 1992 to 1998
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2003; 21(1): 28 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M.-F. Demierre and L. Nathanson
Chemoprevention of Melanoma: An Unexplored Strategy
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2003; 21(1): 158 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
P. Boyle and M. E. Leon
Epidemiology of colorectal cancer
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2002; 64(1): 1 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. C. Chan, S. Y. Lam, K. W. Tsang, B. Lam, J. C. M. Ho, K. H. Fu, W. K. Lam, and Y. L. Kwong
Aberrant Promoter Methylation in Chinese Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Patterns in Primary Tumors and Potential Diagnostic Application in Bronchoalevolar Lavage
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2002; 8(12): 3741 - 3746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
Y. Li and F. H. Sarkar
Gene Expression Profiles of Genistein-Treated PC3 Prostate Cancer Cells
J. Nutr., December 1, 2002; 132(12): 3623 - 3631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. A. Recio, F. P. Noonan, H. Takayama, M. R. Anver, P. Duray, W. L. Rush, G. Lindner, E. C. De Fabo, R. A. DePinho, and G. Merlino
Ink4a/Arf Deficiency Promotes Ultraviolet Radiation-induced Melanomagenesis
Cancer Res., November 15, 2002; 62(22): 6724 - 6730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. Mariotto, E. J. Feuer, L. C. Harlan, L.-M. Wun, K. A. Johnson, and J. Abrams
Trends in Use of Adjuvant Multi-Agent Chemotherapy and Tamoxifen for Breast Cancer in the United States: 1975-1999
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 6, 2002; 94(21): 1626 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
V. L. Ernster, R. Ballard-Barbash, W. E. Barlow, Y. Zheng, D. L. Weaver, G. Cutter, B. C. Yankaskas, R. Rosenberg, P. A. Carney, K. Kerlikowske, et al.
Detection of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Women Undergoing Screening Mammography
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 16, 2002; 94(20): 1546 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howe, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howe, H. L.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, B. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?