Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1999 91(13):1110; doi:10.1093/jnci/91.13.1110
© 1999 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuska, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuska, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 91, No. 13, 1110, July 7, 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press


NEWS

Snipping "SNPs": A New Tool for Mining Gene Variations

Bob Kuska

Scientists often say they can never have too much information stored in gene databases to help them in their studies. Recently, a team of scientists at the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland showed why this is the case.

Using a special computer software package designed to "mine" hidden gems of information stored in the databases, the NCI scientists reported that they discovered a total of 10,435 possible new variations in human genes. These gene variations, known as SNPs for single nucleotide polymorphisms, have captured the attention of many academic and industry scientists in recent years for their likely modifying effects on health, susceptibility to disease — including cancer — and drug metabolism. Scientists estimate that each person has about 1 million SNPs, which occur about once every 1,000 to 2,000 bases, or units, of DNA.

According to Kenneth Buetow, Ph.D., the leader of the NCI research team, the gene variations still must be validated. However, each of the candidate SNPs met statistical confidence levels of .99%, meaning there is a 1% chance or less or error in identifying them as SNPs.

"These variations represent the cleanest, most reliable of our data," said Buetow of his group's study, which involved an analysis of nearly 22,000 genes and required three specialized computer software programs to sort out the sequence.

The SNPs can be found at http://lpg.nci.nih.gov/GAI.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuska, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuska, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?