| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Oxford University Press 2007.
NEWS |
THE NEED FOR SPEED
Adaptive Design May Hasten Clinical Trials
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
It's no secret that drug development can be time-consuming, costly, and prone to failure. That's especially true for new cancer drugs, which succeed in clinical trials only about 5% of the timeroughly half the success rate for all new drugs combined, according to a report in the August 2004 issue of Nature Reviews Drug Development. Despite those dismal odds, the cancer drug business is booming: In September 2006, more than 600 oncology drugs were in clinical development; a 10% increase since 2001, according to Kalorama Information, the publishing division of MarketResearch.com.
Those rising numbers have fueled pressure to speed the clinical trials that evaluate new cancer drugs. Both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the National Cancer Institute are now investigating adaptive designs that may accomplish
Adaptive Designs
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J J. Lee Adaptive Designs for Efficacy and Toxicity Endpoints in Early Drug Development Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 12, 2008; 2008(1): 631 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gianni Ixabepilone and the Narrow Path to Developing New Cytotoxic Drugs J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2007; 25(23): 3389 - 3391. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

