Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2007 99(11):832-833; doi:10.1093/jnci/djk228
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2007.

NEWS

EUROPE PRIORITIZES DRUG RESEARCH

European Union Creates Its Own "Critical Path"

Gunjan Sinha

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

To lure the biomedical industry to Europe, the European Commission (EC) is throwing out some bait. A proposed initiative under the EC's 7th Framework Programme (FP7), the European Union's primary science funding mechanism, would allocate 1 billion euros over the next 7 years to boost research on therapeutic drugs.

Called the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), the proposal recommends using the funds to establish a committee that will dole out grant money to Europe-based public–private collaborations. The grants will go specifically to research that addresses bottlenecks in the drug development pipeline and will ultimately increase the flow of new drugs hitting the market. The EC is presently discussing details of the initiative internally, and the European Council is expected to vote on it by the end of this year.

IMI is similar to FDA's Critical Path Initiative, launched in 2004 in that they both aim to boost drug development. However, they . . . [Full Text of this Article]

The Proposal

Collaborators Reap Rewards

Regulators in the Process


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Coleman
Not credible: a subversion of science by the pharmaceutical industry. Commentary on A global comparison regarding patient access to cancer drugs (Ann Oncol 2007; 18 Suppl 3: pp 1 75)
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2007; 18(9): 1433 - 1435.
[Full Text] [PDF]