Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(24):1761; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj518
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press 2006.

NEWS

5-Year Survival Data Not Always a Good Measure of Progress

Charlie Schmidt

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The 5-year survival rate used to measure progress in the current SEER analysis of adolescent and young adult cancer prognosis is controversial. Although the statistic is common in cancer research, many experts suggest that it can also be prone to biases and . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?