Skip Navigation

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006 98(14):948-951; doi:10.1093/jnci/djj295
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuno, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuno, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press.

EDITORIAL

Breast Cancer Heterogeneity: A Mixture of At Least Two Main Types?

William F. Anderson, Rayna Matsuno

Affiliation of authors: Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

Correspondence to: William F. Anderson, MD, MPH, Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Room 8036, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7244 (e-mail: wanderso@mail.nih.gov).

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Breast cancers are clinically heterogeneous (1). However, breast cancer etiologic heterogeneity is not so well established. Traditionally, breast cancer has been viewed as one biologic entity with common etiology (2). Much like the adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence for colorectal cancer (3–6), breast cancers supposedly result from stochastic molecular changes over long periods. Stepwise molecular alterations are mirrored by histologic progression from normal breast epithelium to atypical hyperplasias to carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer (7,8).

Accumulating facts challenge this purely stochastic view (9). Emerging data demonstrate that the stratification of tumors by gene expression profiles (10–14) and other techniques (15–17) divides breast cancer into a mixture of at least two main types, with five subtypes, according to hormone receptor expression (negative or positive) and/or . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JCOHome page
W. F. Anderson, I. Jatoi, and M. E. Sherman
Qualitative Age Interactions in Breast Cancer Studies: Mind the Gap
J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2009; 27(32): 5308 - 5311.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
M. Mimeault and S. K. Batra
Interplay of distinct growth factors during epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer progenitor cells and molecular targeting as novel cancer therapies
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2007; 18(10): 1605 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
W. F. Anderson, A. S. Reiner, R. K. Matsuno, and R. M. Pfeiffer
Shifting Breast Cancer Trends in the United States
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3923 - 3929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
W. F. Anderson, R. M. Pfeiffer, G. M. Dores, and M. E. Sherman
Comparison of age distribution patterns for different histopathologic types of breast carcinoma.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1899 - 1905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]